Star Wars Episode 3 - suitable for young kids?
Star Wars Episode 3 - suitable for young kids?
Author
Discussion

srebbe64

Original Poster:

13,021 posts

266 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all
All four of my kids, ranging in age from 7, 9, 12 and 14 want to see Star Wars Episode Three - having seen the previous movies.

Some commentators have said it might not be suitable for little kids (bit dark), so what is the opinion of those who have seen it? Particularly any parents that have seen it with younger kids.

BliarOut

72,863 posts

268 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all
My five and seven year olds have been to see it... Not bothered in the slightest apparently. Then again, they love watching surgery on TV! I think a lot depends on the individual kids more than their ages.

Must go and see it myself soon

chris watton

22,547 posts

289 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all
Our kids are aged 8,9 and 10, and they loved it also, they wern't frightened at all, and they never watch adult films, so are not that thick skinned

koenig999

1,667 posts

261 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all
You see worse on TV every night.

I wouldn't go again though, The film was quite poor.

Koenig

parrot of doom

23,075 posts

263 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all
Depends if you want the youngest to see somebody have their limbs chopped off, and burnt alive.

simonrockman

7,119 posts

284 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all
My 7 and 9 year olds had no problem with it. I think last week's Dr. Who was *much* scarier.

peterpeter

6,438 posts

286 months

Friday 3rd June 2005
quotequote all
took my 4 year old to see it and he loved it.

Its not scary and the one scene that is a little gruesome isnt that clear anyway.

It was worth it hearing him imitate the emperor's best lines.

_Deejay_

5,057 posts

283 months

Saturday 4th June 2005
quotequote all
parrot of doom said:
Depends if you want the youngest to see somebody have their limbs chopped off, and burnt alive.


I went to watch it first as I'd heard it was a little gruesome.

I decided that there were a couple of scenes that I didn't want a 4 (nearly 5) yr old to watch (the children being killed and watching someone get set alight).

In the end I got a copy on DVD and skipped those bits (and he loved the rest).

DanH

12,287 posts

289 months

Saturday 4th June 2005
quotequote all
_Deejay_ said:

parrot of doom said:
Depends if you want the youngest to see somebody have their limbs chopped off, and burnt alive.



I went to watch it first as I'd heard it was a little gruesome.

I decided that there were a couple of scenes that I didn't want a 4 (nearly 5) yr old to watch (the children being killed and watching someone get set alight).

In the end I got a copy on DVD and skipped those bits (and he loved the rest).



But now you are teaching your kids that copyright violation is ok!

_Deejay_

5,057 posts

283 months

Saturday 4th June 2005
quotequote all
I did feel somewhat guilty. As the film said, copying films will discourage the production of films and damage the industry in the long term.

I should really mail George my 10 quid to make sure he can afford a decent meal, and continue to produce low budget, quality films which push the boundaries ( without cashing in on the potential to sell merchandise to children)