Rochester vs Holley

Rochester vs Holley

Author
Discussion

Renn Sport

Original Poster:

2,761 posts

216 months

Wednesday 9th August 2017
quotequote all
So... my 55 Chevy is running like spluttering mess. To be fair for a car that so old running the original engine and drivetrain its pretty good going really.

Next year I am going for a LS engine, box and axle conversion so I would like to remedy the situation inexpensively. I had a 68 Mustang and ran like a dream so I now whats possible in terms of smoothness.

I'll give cleaning the jets out another go...


So choice 1.
Have the original 2 barrel Rochester refurbished to like new. £150 + postage + parts £200 maybe £220

choice 2.
Spanking new Holley 600 cfm electric choke carb from the states on an adapter plate £220 + Shipping + duty and + Holley air-cleaner £250 all in??

What do you knowledgeable chaps think? Just go for the new stuff? Or keep to the old?

Just want a smooth running motor for this year and maybe next before the LS project really ramps up.

KevinCamaroSS

12,306 posts

287 months

Wednesday 9th August 2017
quotequote all
Have you any plans for the old engine? If so, then keep the original Rochester, if not, get the Holley.

Matt Harper

6,771 posts

208 months

Wednesday 9th August 2017
quotequote all
it's not a "Power Pack" or "Super Power Pack"? Just the base 265ci?

That being the case, I think a 600cfm 4 barrel will over-fuel it. I'd stick with original and rebuild the Rochester 2bbl. Are you sure the rough running is down to fuel mixture/delivery?

I would be equally suspicious of the ignition system/timing.

Renn Sport

Original Poster:

2,761 posts

216 months

Thursday 10th August 2017
quotequote all
I have no plans for the original engine. It would be nice to keep it, or put in in something but alas I think it will end up on eBay.

Originality only matters so much as from the exterior and interior, I would like the car the car to look a stock as a rock apart from the mild lowering, and the soon to be added American racing torque thrust wheels. Under hood is a different matter, however as modern engine steering and brakes are all on the cards. Even a mild LS will prove so much better to drive than the original lump.

As far as the Holley option, I have been in touch with Holley and they assure me this carb is the absolute base model, which is designed for stock engines. Its not an avenger or a double pumper... just there bog standard job jetted for street cars. The only technical or performance advancement is the 'electric' choke!

I am umming and ahhring over this... think I may go for the holley. Not sure the Rochester is worth messing with.

Northwestel

3 posts

89 months

Tuesday 29th August 2017
quotequote all
Go for an Edelbrock, Holley are tts to tune, failing that re-build the carb. I'ts pretty easy I can help you.

Rough running might be:

Fuel pump / Jet in carb / Float

Edited by Northwestel on Tuesday 29th August 14:48

Total loss

2,138 posts

234 months

Sunday 3rd September 2017
quotequote all
Has your 55 ever run smoothly? if so & now it doesn't, then only the points or cam lobes would have worn out since assuming like most you only do 1000 miles or so a year, every thing else that could cause it would just be out of adjustment & just need tuning.