Type 9 gearbox ratio
Discussion
Just a quick question
I have a sigma 150 with a 5 speed type 9. When I got the car, it didn't feel that quick compared to a mates 1600 k series. After a bit of digging I noticed the diff crown wheel was 3.64. I swapped the diff for a 3.92 and acceleration improved slightly.
Now the previous owner was a little odd, I'm not sure why he would of fit a 3.62 none lsd diff to a 5 speed. Now I'm thinking that he may of swapped the gearbox ratios? This is a total guess but it seems to be missing a bit of zing on acceleration. Is there anyway to calculate the gear ratios and if found to be none standard, would this even affect things?
Car has been RR at 149hp btw but is neck and neck with the k series 1600 down the straights on track (think the k series is supposed to be 115hp)
I have a sigma 150 with a 5 speed type 9. When I got the car, it didn't feel that quick compared to a mates 1600 k series. After a bit of digging I noticed the diff crown wheel was 3.64. I swapped the diff for a 3.92 and acceleration improved slightly.
Now the previous owner was a little odd, I'm not sure why he would of fit a 3.62 none lsd diff to a 5 speed. Now I'm thinking that he may of swapped the gearbox ratios? This is a total guess but it seems to be missing a bit of zing on acceleration. Is there anyway to calculate the gear ratios and if found to be none standard, would this even affect things?
Car has been RR at 149hp btw but is neck and neck with the k series 1600 down the straights on track (think the k series is supposed to be 115hp)
Download gearcalc from here and enter your relevant details and this will give you among other things the MPH per 1000 revs in each gear,
The standard ratios for the type 9 were 1st 3.36, 2nd, 1.81, 3rd 1.225, 4th 1.0, 5th 0.82
You'll then be able to see if your 7 matches the figures in gearcalc.
The standard ratios for the type 9 were 1st 3.36, 2nd, 1.81, 3rd 1.225, 4th 1.0, 5th 0.82
You'll then be able to see if your 7 matches the figures in gearcalc.
pilotprice said:
Just a quick question
I have a sigma 150 with a 5 speed type 9. When I got the car, it didn't feel that quick compared to a mates 1600 k series. After a bit of digging I noticed the diff crown wheel was 3.64. I swapped the diff for a 3.92 and acceleration improved slightly.
Now the previous owner was a little odd, I'm not sure why he would of fit a 3.62 none lsd diff to a 5 speed. Now I'm thinking that he may of swapped the gearbox ratios? This is a total guess but it seems to be missing a bit of zing on acceleration. Is there anyway to calculate the gear ratios and if found to be none standard, would this even affect things?
Car has been RR at 149hp btw but is neck and neck with the k series 1600 down the straights on track (think the k series is supposed to be 115hp)
A standard 1600k makes more like 130bhp. Don't think it's likely the previous owner fitted longer gears- easily confirmed though. The 1:3.92 diff is a good move. I have a sigma 150 with a 5 speed type 9. When I got the car, it didn't feel that quick compared to a mates 1600 k series. After a bit of digging I noticed the diff crown wheel was 3.64. I swapped the diff for a 3.92 and acceleration improved slightly.
Now the previous owner was a little odd, I'm not sure why he would of fit a 3.62 none lsd diff to a 5 speed. Now I'm thinking that he may of swapped the gearbox ratios? This is a total guess but it seems to be missing a bit of zing on acceleration. Is there anyway to calculate the gear ratios and if found to be none standard, would this even affect things?
Car has been RR at 149hp btw but is neck and neck with the k series 1600 down the straights on track (think the k series is supposed to be 115hp)
I've had standard 1600 k-series cars catching me on the start / finish straight in my slip stream and mine's a '140'
Ahh, that's reassuring to hear (in an odd way)
The K just felt like it wanted to get off and go at 3k+
I found the 150 engine needing to rev to get going. The cams obviously just shift the powerband up higher. The RR graph is linear that I have.
Has anyone got a k1600 rr graph to compare?
The K just felt like it wanted to get off and go at 3k+
I found the 150 engine needing to rev to get going. The cams obviously just shift the powerband up higher. The RR graph is linear that I have.
Has anyone got a k1600 rr graph to compare?
Gassing Station | Caterham | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



