Speedmaster sadness.
Speedmaster sadness.
Author
Discussion

Sir Lord Poopie

Original Poster:

212 posts

120 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
Saw a Speedmaster 'in the flesh' for the first time today; I've wanted one for a while.

I have to say I was a little underwhelmed with it in the flesh. It lacks something that the images give it, possibly size? I'm a bit gutted.

AlexC1981

5,851 posts

247 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
Speedy Pro is the bigger one at 42mm across. The Reduced is 38mm.

The 38mm wears pretty small due to the small area covered by the crystal. 42mm should be big enough for anyone!



Edited by AlexC1981 on Monday 20th March 20:19


Edited by AlexC1981 on Monday 20th March 20:19

KungFuPanda

4,643 posts

200 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
When I first got my training contract as a solicitor, I went out and bought the reduced for around £850 I think it was. Sold it for exactly the same money 10 years later. Probably lost on it due to inflation but ho hum.

I recently had the opportunity to get the full sized pro at a reduced priced but passed as I prefer a sub style watch with a rotating bezel.

VGTICE

1,003 posts

117 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
What's wrong with the size, is it too small? You might want to try the Speedy Pro 9300, 44.25mm without crown but freaking thick as a puck.

Wills2

29,757 posts

205 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
I recently bought a panda dial speedy but swapped it for a 45.5mm planet ocean, Omegas wear smaller than case size suggests in my experience a 44.25mm one should do the trick.

nethers66

135 posts

177 months

Monday 20th March 2017
quotequote all
Picked this Speedmaster Racing up at the weekend in Geneva


marcosgt

11,503 posts

206 months

Tuesday 21st March 2017
quotequote all
Sir Lord Poopie said:
Saw a Speedmaster 'in the flesh' for the first time today; I've wanted one for a while.

I have to say I was a little underwhelmed with it in the flesh. It lacks something that the images give it, possibly size?

I'm a bit gutted.
Why? You've just saved yourself a bundle of money smile

M

CAPP0

20,881 posts

233 months

Tuesday 21st March 2017
quotequote all
Is there such a thing as a non-chrono Speedmaster?

benjijames28

1,702 posts

122 months

Tuesday 21st March 2017
quotequote all
CAPP0 said:
Is there such a thing as a non-chrono Speedmaster?
Why would there be? The whole point of the watch is the chronograph.

Get a planet ocean.

CAPP0

20,881 posts

233 months

Tuesday 21st March 2017
quotequote all
benjijames28 said:
CAPP0 said:
Is there such a thing as a non-chrono Speedmaster?
Why would there be? The whole point of the watch is the chronograph.

Get a planet ocean.
I already have a PO smile

I like the non-diver look of the Speedy but don't like chronos.

ewand

938 posts

244 months

Wednesday 22nd March 2017
quotequote all
CAPP0 said:
Is there such a thing as a non-chrono Speedmaster?
Railmaster? https://www.chronext.co.uk/guide/omega/seamaster-r...



VGTICE

1,003 posts

117 months

Wednesday 22nd March 2017
quotequote all
ewand said:
That's a seamaster though not speedmaster.

ewand

938 posts

244 months

Thursday 23rd March 2017
quotequote all
no, it's a Railmaster.

FWIW, Omega have just announced three 60-year anniversary watches for the Seamaster (2913), Railmaster (2914) and Speedmaster (2915).


VGTICE

1,003 posts

117 months

Thursday 23rd March 2017
quotequote all
That railmaster is a joke. They basically got rid of the bezel and made a new watch out of that.

anonymous-user

84 months

Thursday 23rd March 2017
quotequote all
VGTICE said:
ewand said:
That's a seamaster though not speedmaster.
I think it's a railmaster,

dc2rr07

1,238 posts

261 months

Thursday 23rd March 2017
quotequote all
VGTICE said:
That railmaster is a joke. They basically got rid of the bezel and made a new watch out of that.
Or they added a bezel to the Railmaster to make a Seamaster, someone may be able to tell us which one came first.

VGTICE

1,003 posts

117 months

Thursday 23rd March 2017
quotequote all
dc2rr07 said:
VGTICE said:
That railmaster is a joke. They basically got rid of the bezel and made a new watch out of that.
Or they added a bezel to the Railmaster to make a Seamaster, someone may be able to tell us which one came first.
Not sure if you're serious. They took the Seamaster 300 and removed the bezel.

UnclePat

511 posts

117 months

Thursday 23rd March 2017
quotequote all
If you do fancy having two extremely similar-looking watches, and their anniversary Speedmaster as well, Omega are offering 557 box sets of all three of them together, with special caseback engravings and an extra dial signature. Costs GBP £16,000 for that, mind. Not one for me!

apotek

722 posts

215 months

Thursday 23rd March 2017
quotequote all
Every time I read a speedmaster thread I dig mine out and wear the old girl for a few days.
She`s 40+ only ever had one sevice in the late eighties I think and still keeps very good time.

anonymous-user

84 months

Thursday 23rd March 2017
quotequote all
apotek said:
Every time I read a speedmaster thread I dig mine out and wear the old girl for a few days.
She`s 40+ only ever had one sevice in the late eighties I think and still keeps very good time.
Classic iconic watches. I've got an old speedie too, it would be my last watch to sell.