BMW E93 325i -v- CLK W209 280/350 Convertible?
BMW E93 325i -v- CLK W209 280/350 Convertible?
Author
Discussion

RESSE

Original Poster:

5,888 posts

237 months

Thursday 23rd February 2017
quotequote all
I wonder if anyone has ownership experiences of either the BMW E93 325i M Sport or Mercedes CLK 280/350 Sport convertible?

Our budget is £8,000 to £9,000, and I think this would get a lowish mileage model from 2007/2008/2009?

I like the hard top of the E93 but boot space of the CLK looks better - the car would be used for weekends, trips to Europe (total annual mileage no more than 8,000).

Thanks in advance.

smile




sparks_E39

12,738 posts

229 months

Thursday 23rd February 2017
quotequote all
Get a 330i, not a 325i. Literally zero downsides the having the 330i.

a4cabrio

924 posts

175 months

Thursday 23rd February 2017
quotequote all
As has been said, if you go for the BMW then get a 330i, I ran an e93 for a couple of years, sold it last year and still wish I'd kept it.

RESSE

Original Poster:

5,888 posts

237 months

Thursday 23rd February 2017
quotequote all
sparks_E39 said:
Get a 330i, not a 325i. Literally zero downsides the having the 330i.
Thanks for the reply.

Is the 335i worth considering, although most of the ones I can find for sale are SE spec?