(ANSWERED) What happened to the Khan thread?
Discussion
I read 12 pages or so of it, and yes it did mention once or twice that the Khan brand appeared to be tasteless tat (clearly in the opinion of the posters). (And that what the man had done to the Vantage was answerable only to the "crimes against humanity" court)
To be fair, many commented that Khan himself had built a considerable business selling such tasteless tat, and that should be applauded. (Though some other didn't applaud)
Who am I to judge - I quite like French cars.
To be fair, many commented that Khan himself had built a considerable business selling such tasteless tat, and that should be applauded. (Though some other didn't applaud)
Who am I to judge - I quite like French cars.
markiii said:
it started off talking about the tastless chav wagons (they are)
Then went on about how he came across as a prize bellend (he does)
then hyopthised about criminal activities which is probably what got it canned
This. Although two of the three points that Mark's made in the post above were somewhat substantiated by people based on their experience of the product and the owner. Then went on about how he came across as a prize bellend (he does)
then hyopthised about criminal activities which is probably what got it canned
The final point was, as hypothesised on the thread, unsubstantiated. Many people however eluded to there being no smoke without fire.
p4cks said:
This. Although two of the three points that Mark's made in the post above were somewhat substantiated by people based on their experience of the product and the owner.
The final point was, as hypothesised on the thread, unsubstantiated. Many people however eluded to there being no smoke without fire.
What about smoke machines?The final point was, as hypothesised on the thread, unsubstantiated. Many people however eluded to there being no smoke without fire.
Gassing Station | Website Feedback | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff