New Sinn 103 St
Author
Discussion

jim3

Original Poster:

52 posts

242 months

Tuesday 8th November 2016
quotequote all
I wanted to get a decent mechanical chrono to keep and narrowed it down to a Sinn 103 a long time ago - finally got round to buying it.
This is the St model, with high domed acrylic glass and anodised friction pilot's bezel.
I love it - perfect size for me (41 mm diameter) and the acrylic is absolutely gorgeous. I've only owned sapphire glass dive watches previously and I was initially concerned about the scratch potential of acrylic. However, the depth and distortion effect is well worth having to polywatch it occasionally. Overall it has a vintage look (without being too contrived) but with reliable mechanicals (Valjoux 7750). A leather strap dresses it up and it goes under a cuff easily (most of the 15.5 mm height is the domed acrylic).





Captain Smerc

3,348 posts

146 months

Tuesday 8th November 2016
quotequote all
That's very nice indeed ,

andy tims

5,606 posts

276 months

Tuesday 8th November 2016
quotequote all
Nice one

CardShark

4,262 posts

209 months

Wednesday 9th November 2016
quotequote all
Great choice thumbup

scherzkeks

4,460 posts

164 months

Friday 11th November 2016
quotequote all
Pondered one of these for a while but ended up with a Chrono Superocean as I already have an 856S. Nice choice.

bazza.

824 posts

122 months

Friday 11th November 2016
quotequote all
I do have a soft spot for Sinn's I went on there factory tour a few years back its will worth it
Here are my 4 hopefully a UX should be joining them on Monday

SVS

3,824 posts

301 months

Sunday 13th November 2016
quotequote all
Good choice OP thumbup Normally I prefer Damasko over Sinn, but the 103 St looks great!

klmhcp

247 posts

122 months

Monday 14th November 2016
quotequote all
They look incredibly awkward on you - I can't tell if your wrists are too small for them or if you're just wearing them slightly unusually distal.

jim3

Original Poster:

52 posts

242 months

Tuesday 15th November 2016
quotequote all
klmhcp said:
They look incredibly awkward on you - I can't tell if your wrists are too small for them or if you're just wearing them slightly unusually distal.
Be sure to let me know if you manage to come to a conclusion. I'll wait with bated breath.

andy_s

19,856 posts

289 months

Saturday 19th November 2016
quotequote all
The 103 range is great, and you don't get your pants pulled down on price. One of the wiser watch choices.

warren182

1,092 posts

240 months

Saturday 19th November 2016
quotequote all
Lovely. The thickness puts me off having one, but they do look very nice.

T6 vanman

3,554 posts

129 months

Sunday 20th November 2016
quotequote all
jim3 said:
klmhcp said:
They look incredibly awkward on you - I can't tell if your wrists are too small for them or if you're just wearing them slightly unusually distal.
Be sure to let me know if you manage to come to a conclusion. I'll wait with bated breath.
Rest assured Jim3 for my 2 pennith it's the fact you have taken 4 shot's and not one decent photo rofl rather than anything wrong with the watch ... or wrist byebye

bazza.

824 posts

122 months

Sunday 20th November 2016
quotequote all
Looks spot on chap have no fear enjoy