Hublot
Author
Discussion

Blue One

Original Poster:

492 posts

209 months

Wednesday 7th September 2016
quotequote all
I know as per many threads that this is a real Marmite brand on here, but as the proud owner of a 'Big Bang' I wanted to share some recent feedback and thoughts on the brand, pricing and customer service:

Good:
- Bold designs
- Very rare and original
- Unknown to many non-aficionados

Cons
- Watches aside, everything they do is massively overpriced, I looked at a cheapish looking (and feeling) hexagonal shaped Hublot pen in the London boutique recently and couldn't believe when I was told it was GBP 1, 200!
- Their watch prices are also very ambitious compared to other premium brands
- The servicing of watches takes a long time
- Customer service seems very 'Goldsmiths' in their stores, given this is a premium brand, their staff seem strangely disconnected and not overly bothered about customer service or concerns

So in summary, I'm totally pleased I own such a rare and original watch, but I certainly can't say the overall brand management and pricing helps support that...


Edited by Blue One on Wednesday 7th September 09:49


Edited by Blue One on Wednesday 7th September 09:49


Edited by Blue One on Wednesday 7th September 09:50

bobbybee

889 posts

184 months

Wednesday 7th September 2016
quotequote all
1. they are not rare, nearly every prem footballist, F1 driver, American footballist has / had one
2. massively overpriced for tarted up ETA movements
3. due to the screw design they can't be lined up properly and look messy
4. most are too big
5. non-aficionados don't really care about any watch brand, mainly just looks
6. aficionados aren't that bothered on the main part (see points 1-4)


All of course IMO, if you like it, you enjoy it. The most sensible purchase of anything for oneself is for self enjoyment.

Blue One

Original Poster:

492 posts

209 months

Wednesday 7th September 2016
quotequote all
Given that luxury watches are all a total indulgence (one or two exceptions) the whole market is subjective based on taste and preference for an overpriced wrist adornment.

Not sure the comment on screw head allignment, to me shows the baseplate/besal is genuinely held in by screws rather than faux ones for show (although presumably on other makes these are more bolt heads thus allowing easy allignment?)

Mr.Jimbo

2,084 posts

213 months

Thursday 8th September 2016
quotequote all
You can design parts to be tightened to alignment and still have same clamp loads etc, some modern engines do it with spark plugs for example, so I'm astounded at that pricepoint/design feature that they aren't. Would drive me nuts, personally.

bobbybee

889 posts

184 months

Thursday 8th September 2016
quotequote all
Blue One said:
Given that luxury watches are all a total indulgence (one or two exceptions) the whole market is subjective based on taste and preference for an overpriced wrist adornment.

Not sure the comment on screw head allignment, to me shows the baseplate/besal is genuinely held in by screws rather than faux ones for show (although presumably on other makes these are more bolt heads thus allowing easy allignment?)
Ooh, what are the exceptions?

Blue One

Original Poster:

492 posts

209 months

Thursday 8th September 2016
quotequote all
bobbybee said:
Ooh, what are the exceptions?
Well I was thinking professional divers or pilots who insist or need a specialist premium brand watch

bobbybee

889 posts

184 months

Friday 9th September 2016
quotequote all
Blue One said:
Well I was thinking professional divers or pilots who insist or need a specialist premium brand watch
Ahh, I get you, but I think you'd find in nearly all cases that a specialist watch isn't a luxury watch. In the example of a pro diver, they'd use a diver computer, not a luxury 'sports' watch considering their life depends on it

Debaser

8,564 posts

291 months

Saturday 10th September 2016
quotequote all
Few years ago I heard dealers had bought Hublots, which turned out to be fake. Hublot had to send a document to their ADs clarifying the (very slight) differences.

Do they still use mainly ETA movements?

Blue One

Original Poster:

492 posts

209 months

Saturday 10th September 2016
quotequote all
Debaser said:
Few years ago I heard dealers had bought Hublots, which turned out to be fake. Hublot had to send a document to their ADs clarifying the (very slight) differences.

Do they still use mainly ETA movements?
Per my original post, the 'dealer network' seems very weak, and I don't think they have the built-in security markings Rolex has (not that I can see anyway). I think (like Tudor) they are phasing out ETA with their own in-house movement.

anonymous-user

84 months

Saturday 10th September 2016
quotequote all
Is your camera broken or something?

Let's see some photos!

Blue One

Original Poster:

492 posts

209 months

Monday 12th September 2016
quotequote all
NinjaPower said:
Is your camera broken or something?

Let's see some photos!
No prob - here you go



SirSquidalot

4,064 posts

195 months

Monday 12th September 2016
quotequote all
Cant stand them, think they are over priced tat. The fake market is flooded with them and its very hard to tell the difference.

Blue One

Original Poster:

492 posts

209 months

Monday 12th September 2016
quotequote all
SirSquidalot said:
Cant stand them, think they are over priced tat. The fake market is flooded with them and its very hard to tell the difference.
and there was me thinking that PHers were just a load of Hublot haters...

bobbybee

889 posts

184 months

Tuesday 13th September 2016
quotequote all
Blue One said:
No prob - here you go


Not a great Hublot fan, however they do make some nice subtle units, unfortunately that fugly POS isn't one of them.