Footie rant.
Author
Discussion

c c

Original Poster:

8,048 posts

268 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
Apologies if this have been done before. I don’t follow football that much.

I was watching BBC news24 last night. When they got to the football news never once did they mention a British name amongst the stories about player and managers and so on.
Are there any home grown footballers any more or do we import them all too.

_Deejay_

5,057 posts

283 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
c c said:
Apologies if this have been done before. I don’t follow football that much.

I was watching BBC news24 last night. When they got to the football news never once did they mention a British name amongst the stories about player and managers and so on.
Are there any home grown footballers any more or do we import them all too.


Have you heard of Rooney? Beckham? Owen? Gerrard? Lampard? Terry?

There is a great influx of foreign players in the english game, but it's inevitable given the amount of money that is in the game through TV revenue.

scruffy

3,757 posts

290 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
I£'s a hot topic a£ £he mo, bo£h Chelsea and ArseNIL have fielded £eams with no 'english' players. Mos£ big clubs do have you£h policies for local scro£es.
My £eam has produced a few 'names' (one even adver£ises a shaver), but you're righ£ £here does seem £o be a certain a££rac£ion to the english league(s). Can'£ £hink wha£ iT is £hough...

lotuslad

5,253 posts

283 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
I'm sorry, we don't discuss soccer in this pub. I believe Yates' caters for that sort of thing.

Did anyone catch the shinty results?

AC79xxx

62,260 posts

278 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
Yep, the premiership is awash with foreign imports but the championship, divs 1 & 2 contain far fewer.

scruffy said:
bo£h Chelsea and ArseNIL have fielded £eams with no 'english' players.


[pedant]Chelsea were the first to field an all foreign XI but Arsenal were the first to name an all foreign starting XI plus 5 foreign substitutes [/pedant]

c c

Original Poster:

8,048 posts

268 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
As I said personally I don’t follow the game. However it is supposed to be the national sport. It’s a shame therefore that the FA and the top Premier League clubs have allowed this situation to develop.
Are any clubs actively involved with training and promoting young players? Or do they simply nip across the channel to buy new players along with some cheap booze.

scruffy

3,757 posts

290 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
Couple of dismaying quotes:

the Mirror said:
New FA rules prevent English teams signing a youngster living more than an hour's drive from the club. ...The regulation would have stopped United from signing David Beckham as a schoolboy, as he hails from Leytonstone in East London.

But the rule does not apply to foreign starlets and has forced United to look for talent overseas.



anonymous-user

83 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
scruffy said:
Couple of dismaying quotes:


the Mirror said:
New FA rules prevent English teams signing a youngster living more than an hour's drive from the club. ...The regulation would have stopped United from signing David Beckham as a schoolboy, as he hails from Leytonstone in East London.

But the rule does not apply to foreign starlets and has forced United to look for talent overseas.






The FA. Never was an organisation so aptly named.

Not many people realise it but "Mike Bassett, England Manager" was actually a documentary.

Size Nine Elm

5,167 posts

313 months

Wednesday 2nd March 2005
quotequote all
lotuslad said:

Did anyone catch the shinty results?

http://shinty.com/leagues2004.htm