911 rennsport
Author
Discussion

v8ksn

Original Poster:

4,713 posts

213 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
Has anyone had any dealings with this company?

I am thinking of buying one of their cars...... this one - http://911rennsport.co.uk/for-sale/slate-grey-911s...

Before I take things with them any further, can anyone shed any light on them?

Good points and bad points both welcome (as well as private messages via my profile if you don't want to say anything in public)

Kind regards
Kul

Budflicker

3,799 posts

213 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
You're not thinking of swapping the GT3 for that though are you???


They look ok but it's not a cheap Singer, more like an expensive 3.2 with a few bits chucked on it.

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

294 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
not a fan of back dates, it's now a nothing car.

it's a £85k 1982 3.0 litre SC , not a lot more you can say, I would rather have an org my self.

A nice org 911E or a 964 would be the better buy imo.

Koln-RS

4,122 posts

241 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
I think they are quite a good company, although no personal experience.

But agree with the sentiment about 'backdates' - much prefer 'originality'.

v8ksn

Original Poster:

4,713 posts

213 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
Budflicker said:
You're not thinking of swapping the GT3 for that though are you???

They look ok but it's not a cheap Singer, more like an expensive 3.2 with a few bits chucked on it.
Not selling the GT3 but this LOOKS very nice, I am just not sure about whats underneath the paint....
It's funny you say its not a cheap Singer because thats what I was aiming for! My fear is like you say, its an expensive 3.2 bitza.

I have been having dreams about the Singer 911's ever since they came out and I know they will never be affordable (for me), I guess I am looking for the next best thing....

v8ksn

Original Poster:

4,713 posts

213 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
Porsche911R said:
not a fan of back dates, it's now a nothing car.

A nice org 911E or a 964 would be the better buy imo.
Koln-RS said:
I think they are quite a good company, although no personal experience.

But agree with the sentiment about 'backdates' - much prefer 'originality'.
The problem with 'original' cars is current sellers want the moon on a stick for a rust-bucket!

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

294 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
do what Steve Rance has just done, that looks mega imo.

IknowJoseph

552 posts

169 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all

Koln-RS

4,122 posts

241 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
v8ksn said:
The problem with 'original' cars is current sellers want the moon on a stick for a rust-bucket!
A 'backdate' can also be a can of worms - mechanically and bodily. To me they're bitzas - someone else's interpretation of a Porsche model.

hot66

700 posts

246 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
have a read through this ( now edited ) thread. A few unimpressed with the quality.

http://www.ddk-online.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=2...

hot66

700 posts

246 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
have a read through this ( now edited ) thread. A few unimpressed with the quality.

http://www.ddk-online.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=2...

Edited by hot66 on Monday 15th February 15:37

v8ksn

Original Poster:

4,713 posts

213 months

Monday 15th February 2016
quotequote all
hot66 said:
have a read through this ( now edited ) thread. A few unimpressed with the quality.

http://www.ddk-online.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=2...
Cheers for that, quite eye opening!

Its the second thread I have read on them and their cars and it does seem like the 'restoration' is not as thorough as one would expect given the prices they are asking.

I'll give them a miss I reckon