What is the whole point of owning a mini?

What is the whole point of owning a mini?

Author
Discussion

vrooom

Original Poster:

3,763 posts

273 months

Thursday 27th January 2005
quotequote all

What are they? Why we love our minis and driving them despine they rust and making us poorer with part breaking. no space for other people sitting in back.

So why we love it. I know why. but let me hear your reason first.

jay

minimax

11,984 posts

262 months

Thursday 27th January 2005
quotequote all
sicks two fingers up at the motoring numpties who don't even know how to change a wheel, stylish, cool, great handling, great sound, cheap to maintain, raw and uncompromising, easy to modify, great club scene, it's a classic car, good at giantkilling, plus lots of other reasons


I love my mini

Plotloss

67,280 posts

276 months

Thursday 27th January 2005
quotequote all
Point of a Mini?

Not a clue.

However, like many people on PH I have been fortunate enough to drive a few nice cars in my time.

However.

There is nothing, not one motor car that I have ever been in other than a Mini that makes me smile from the moment I lay eyes on it.

The look, the drive, the size. Its perfect.

For me, its the ultimate car and I cant for one minute think why in an easy to explain sound bite.

Cooperman

4,428 posts

256 months

Thursday 27th January 2005
quotequote all
I've been asking myself that for over 40 years and still don't have the answer!
They are too small, bloody uncomfortable, bumpy, unreliable, noisy, rusty, idiosyncratic, old fashioned........and blooming fabulous!!!!!!!!!!!!!

DodgyDave

810 posts

257 months

Thursday 27th January 2005
quotequote all
I thought quite long and hard over this as I was never really a fan of minis till i owned one.
My old black GT Clubman, the man's mini i always said.
It just looked so mean compared to the girly cooper.
But after having my BRG 95spi cooper S for four years now I know that I will never sell it.
I love the fact i can look at my mini and see the car in its component form. I look at the engine and can see every moving part doing its thing.
But most of all I love driving the arse off it down my favourite back road.
I can have so much more fun in that than any other car while only just breaking the law

Lol i can post some pics of my old clubman......... after it became a trailer

love machine

7,609 posts

241 months

Friday 28th January 2005
quotequote all
I have driven a lot of very fun chuckable cars but the mini is more fun and more chuckable than all of them.

It puts a lot of modern better machinery to shame and knowing that is priceless. I had a road race from Sennen to St Ives with a Porsche 911 (driven by a mad German) via a VERY windy "A" road. He could caught me on a long straight but I soon lost him on the windy bits. It's a case of "hang on with your ass" and just steer it where you want it to go.

Cooperman

4,428 posts

256 months

Friday 28th January 2005
quotequote all
Sounds like the driver in the Mini was better. I used to own a 2.7 Carrera and I reckon it was much quicker than my 1964 Historic Rally Car everywhere, except, perhaps, on a really narrow single track twisty and wet lane.
Mini is more fun, though.

Coco H

4,237 posts

243 months

Friday 28th January 2005
quotequote all
I don't know. Between us we have owned a few. The latest one that is being worked on is of the space frame variety.

I like their simplicity and the work you can do on them simple tuning etc- can be applied to other vehicles.

When you have had enough you can angle grind them up and stuff them in a skip (this happened to OHs old one)

tuscan_v8

2,496 posts

290 months

Friday 28th January 2005
quotequote all
vrooom said:


So why we love it. I know why. but let me hear your reason first.

jay



so what your's?

vrooom

Original Poster:

3,763 posts

273 months

Friday 28th January 2005
quotequote all
I like them beacuse, they are fun to drive without breaking the speed limit.

and Mini is the only car that i have been stopped by police to tell me off for being too quick in the corner

the parts are cheap, and mini is very simple car to fix and repair. I love the driving postion on it.

best after all, they are british and small.

RickApple

429 posts

241 months

Friday 28th January 2005
quotequote all
Going around a large roundabout in the dry at speeds which would be classified reckless in a larger car. Many times!

love machine

7,609 posts

241 months

Saturday 29th January 2005
quotequote all
Cooperman said:
Sounds like the driver in the Mini was better. I used to own a 2.7 Carrera and I reckon it was much quicker than my 1964 Historic Rally Car everywhere, except, perhaps, on a really narrow single track twisty and wet lane.
Mini is more fun, though.


Hey Cooperman, do you want me to sort the engine out for you?

Cooperman

4,428 posts

256 months

Monday 31st January 2005
quotequote all
love machine said:

Cooperman said:
Sounds like the driver in the Mini was better. I used to own a 2.7 Carrera and I reckon it was much quicker than my 1964 Historic Rally Car everywhere, except, perhaps, on a really narrow single track twisty and wet lane.
Mini is more fun, though.



Hey Cooperman, do you want me to sort the engine out for you?


It's the f***ing gearbox/transmission I get the problems with.
Seriously, though, I've driven both Minis and various 911's on all levels of rallies up to full International and a 911, driven by someone of equal ability, will always be quicker than a Mini on over 90% of roads. The exception may be on some historic rallies where there are twisty tests, but I would hate to be up against a 911 Carrera in my '64 'S' on a twisty tarmac stage rally unless, perhaps, it was snowy and icy and studded tyres were banned.
The numbers really speak for themselves, a good Mini with 115 bhp at 740 Kg (in rally trim) compared with 250 bhp (tuned Carrera 2.7) at c.1100 Kg. The Porsche with an LSD, C/R box, superb suspension and traction compared to the Mini with its fantastic 'chuckability', neat handling but lower power/weight ratio and limited suspension travel.

guru_1071

2,768 posts

240 months

Monday 31st January 2005
quotequote all
cooperman.

i think its only fair that you lend me your porsche for a few weeks, just so i can make a informed decision on which i like best!

every one else form a queue behind me!!!

rich

Cooperman

4,428 posts

256 months

Monday 31st January 2005
quotequote all
Sorry, I sold the Porsche when I moved house about 8 years ago.
It was quite funny as our old house had 4 garages/workshops and we had the Porsche, a Rolls Silver Shadow, plus two Cooper 'S's, the red 1275, which I still have, and a white/black 970 'S' historic rally car.
Our new house had only 2 garages, so we sold the Roller and the Carrera. There was no way I would sell the Minis. In hindsight, I wish I had kept the Porsche and let the 970 'S' go, as the Porsche would now be eligible as a post-historic rally car, which it wasn't at the time. I really didn't like the 970 - it was all 'revs' and no 'go'. A class winner, yes, but not great to drive like the 1275. That went and I got a Mini Pick-up, which 'Rougeleo' bought a couple of years ago and I now have the 1990 Cooper Enduro-Rally car.
If anyone is interested I could be prepared to sell the Enduro car as a 'ready-to-go' rally car. I guess I'd sell it for about £5,000. It is like a new car with absolutely no rust, full preparation and 83 bhp at the flywheel fron the 'blueprinted' engine. Full spec on request.

love machine

7,609 posts

241 months

Tuesday 1st February 2005
quotequote all
How much torque has the 911 got?

Also, tell me more about the 970, I've always thought they were meant to be excellent. A bloke near me got 110hp out of a short stroke 850cc. It revved like a fireblade. Hideous fuel consumption though.

What final drives were they running?

guru_1071

2,768 posts

240 months

Tuesday 1st February 2005
quotequote all
i ran a 970 for a while and it was awful. it was bored 73.5mm (1050) and ran a 649, sc drops, sc box etc. it needed one set of plugs to get it going, then a harder set to make it go. every so often it would drop onto three plugs!.

it never seemed to go very well and eventually blew up and broke the crank in the outside lane of the m1. i took the whole thing out, and binned it.

in a way it was a good think as i lernt a valuable lesson.

1071 is the way forward!!!

Cooperman

4,428 posts

256 months

Tuesday 1st February 2005
quotequote all
You're right, the 1071 is the nicest 'S' engine. I built one with a very big valve head, a 649 cam (big mistake!), twin 1.5" SU's, etc, and it was just so smooth and very quick.
The 970 is just 'orrible. All revs but no real go. Ours was 999 cc, had a 286, Omega pistons, 11:1 c.r, light flywheel, s/c, c/r box with 4.1 diff, twin 1.5 SU's, plus everything else, but it got blown away on tarmac stages by a 1000 cc Imp on twin 40 DCOE Webers revving to 10,000. I just hated it really.
Give me my 1293 'S' any day.
The high figure for the 850 is, I think, a bit suspect. It is very hard to get over 85 bhp per litre for an 'A-Series' even in race trim. With anything like 80 bhp it would be virtually un-driveable. What crank would it use, the basic 850 crank will eventually snap due to fatigue at about 7000 unless a different one was fitted. Sceptical,me???
Don't know what the torque of a 911 Carrera is, just lots. It did 0-60 in 5.0 with a top end, on its slightly lower diff, of around 140 at 7200. It was fabulous.

guru_1071

2,768 posts

240 months

Tuesday 1st February 2005
quotequote all
i guess the 850 mentioned was a destroked 970 - gordan allen did the cranks for them.

they will rev to 11,000 plus.

absolutley usless on the road of course!!!!!

Cooperman

4,428 posts

256 months

Tuesday 1st February 2005
quotequote all
I remember those 850 'S's. From memory you might get 95 bhp at the flywheel but, as you say, nothing below about 5500 rpm. I guess there are some optimistic dynos around.
My 970 was giving 84 bhp at the flywheel and it was still difficult to drive on a 4.1 diff with the s/c gears. Nasty little car!