Torque measurements

Author
Discussion

pelo

Original Poster:

542 posts

279 months

Wednesday 24th July 2002
quotequote all
Possibly silly question: I am used to measuring torque in Nm (Newton Metres). I have been confused about the units used in gran turismo (Kilogram Metres, Kgm). But just the other day i thought: 10 newtons per kilo. 42.9Kgm = 429 Nm ??? is this right?
An d how do foot pounds work?

AJLintern

4,234 posts

269 months

Wednesday 24th July 2002
quotequote all
I imagine 1 pound foot of torque would approximate to 1.35 NM

V8Bert

37 posts

268 months

Wednesday 24th July 2002
quotequote all
That's pretty much correct.

To be precise you have to use 'g' (which is about 9.8 instead of 10) to convert from Kilograms to Netwons.

pelo

Original Poster:

542 posts

279 months

Wednesday 24th July 2002
quotequote all
quote:


To be precise you have to use 'g' (which is about 9.8 instead of 10) to convert from Kilograms to Netwons.



9.8? isnt that accerleration of gravity (m/s). generally accepted as 10?

V8Bert

37 posts

268 months

Wednesday 24th July 2002
quotequote all
quote:


9.8? isnt that accerleration of gravity (m/s). generally accepted as 10?



Yes.

AJLintern

4,234 posts

269 months

Wednesday 24th July 2002
quotequote all
Or 9.81 if you want to be that accurate

ATG

21,190 posts

278 months

Wednesday 24th July 2002
quotequote all
[trainspotting]
'g' is generally assumed to be 9.8 ms-2 (or N/kg). It varies depending on your alltitude, the density of the rock you're standing on. The actual force you "feel" also depends on how far you are from the axis of rotation of the earth, the position of the moon. For a fascinating table of values measured at different lattitudes see:- www.earthmatrix.com/extract81.html
[/trainspotting]

pelo

Original Poster:

542 posts

279 months

Wednesday 24th July 2002
quotequote all

KenD

144 posts

268 months

Wednesday 24th July 2002
quotequote all
As far as I know you cannot convert from Nm to ftlbs as there is no direct conversion factor

GreenV8S

30,427 posts

290 months

Wednesday 24th July 2002
quotequote all
quote:

As far as I know you cannot convert from Nm to ftlbs as there is no direct conversion factor



Nonesense, they're both units of torque and can be directly converted just by multiplying by the appropriate factor.

SGirl

7,922 posts

267 months

Wednesday 24th July 2002
quotequote all
quote:

As far as I know you cannot convert from Nm to ftlbs as there is no direct conversion factor



Isn't the conversion factor 1 Nm > 0.738 ft. lb.??

animal

5,314 posts

274 months

Wednesday 24th July 2002
quotequote all
1.000 Nm : 0.738 lb/ft sounds about right to me.

Can also be expressed as 1.000 lb/ft : 1.355 Nm.

gnomesmith

2,458 posts

282 months

Wednesday 24th July 2002
quotequote all
You guys are all torque.

JohnL

1,763 posts

271 months

Friday 26th July 2002
quotequote all
1 kg = 9.81 N (so 1 kgm = 9.81 Nm as above)
1 ft = 0.3048 m
1 kg = 2.2 lb

soooo ...

1 Nm / 9.81 = 0.102 kgm
0.102 kgm x 2.2 = 0.224 ft-m
0.224 ft-m / 0.3048 = 0.735 lb-ft

so:
1 Nm = 0.735 lb-ft
1 lb-ft = 1.3607 Nm (ie 1/0.735)





JohnL

1,763 posts

271 months

Friday 26th July 2002
quotequote all
So how do you convert horsepower to Watts (or Kilowatts)?
What is the definition of 1 hp?

AJLintern

4,234 posts

269 months

Friday 26th July 2002
quotequote all
Depends what type of horse it is I suppose: ie. a shire horse is more powerful than a pony

Richard92c2

464 posts

269 months

Friday 26th July 2002
quotequote all
Horsepower can also be measured in decibel ...

If one screams at the top of ones voice until one is "horse" the measurement can .......

Ok, Ok it is after all Friday! I'm leaving now!

Fatboy

8,069 posts

278 months

Friday 26th July 2002
quotequote all
1 kW (1000W) is about 1.66 hp IIRC

ellingtj

303 posts

280 months

Friday 26th July 2002
quotequote all
1hp = 1.014Ps = 0.746kW

GreenV8S

30,427 posts

290 months

Friday 26th July 2002
quotequote all
quote:

1hp = 1.014Ps = 0.746kW



[anorak-mode-on]
Remember you still need to account for the temp/pressure conditions that the measurement was taken at, there are umpteen different 'standard' conditions each with their corresponding correction factors, so you can't even assume that 1hp = 1hp unless they are corrected to the same standard.
[anorak-mode-off]