RE: F1 Falters?

Monday 21st May 2001

F1 Falters?

Manufacturers to go it alone


Author
Discussion

dubbs

Original Poster:

1,590 posts

292 months

Monday 21st May 2001
quotequote all
Excellent news! This should see some interesting things happening all over the industry. Last year''s deliberations with the British GP, Bernie, Nicola Foulsdon, Brands and Silverstone sent the whole motorsport world into a little turmoil. It would be good for the whole industry to knock a little wind out of the F1 sails.

AndrewD

7,594 posts

292 months

Monday 21st May 2001
quotequote all
Hasn't this been doing the rounds for a while now? Presume it is just a story to put the wind up Bernie's sails whilst the manufacturers negotiate some concession or other?

nmilton

449 posts

290 months

Monday 21st May 2001
quotequote all
It surfaced a couple of months ago and cropped up on Autosport.com on Friday. I'm guessing it's a bit of sabre-rattling but if they're not careful they could end up having to put their money where their mouths are. Frankly I can't see it being any more successful than F1 currently is purely because the most important manufacturers, i.e. Fiat, Mercedes and BMW are involved - you'll still have all the same politics and mistrust between them all, except now they'll all have much more to lose. Bernie, for all his faults, does seem to have a knack for sorting things like this out, though how far his patience will stretch remains to be seen. He didn't sound too impressed when it was first proposed !!

.mark

11,104 posts

284 months

Monday 21st May 2001
quotequote all
It seems they always make noises but things rarely come of them, 2008 is a long time away, long enough for the public to forget about what was said. What ever happened to Premier1? This was the new series supposedly starting this year then put back to next now gone all quiet. They were going to be a single make formula racing in top football team colours.

lucky

16 posts

292 months

Monday 21st May 2001
quotequote all
Here in the USA a lot of racing fans are denied seeing F1 at all, because of TV rights. This is a huge market for BMW, FOrd, and of course DaimlerCrysler. I'm not surprised they'd go it alone to get better exposure in the US market.

jamesc

2,820 posts

292 months

Monday 21st May 2001
quotequote all
Here in the UK we are denied live NASCAR, can we do a swap? NASCAR is far more exciting than F1.

ahonen

5,024 posts

287 months

Tuesday 22nd May 2001
quotequote all
OK, F1 is pretty dull at times, but nascar? Lord, save us from the hillbillies... If you want to watch exciting racing, GP 'bikes or WSB should fit the bill. Both are live on terrestrial telly, and neither feature Murray Walker. Double bonus.

jamesc

2,820 posts

292 months

Tuesday 22nd May 2001
quotequote all
The Bikes are exciting, and no Tony Jardine either!

jmorgan

36,010 posts

292 months

Saturday 26th May 2001
quotequote all
They should do away with qualifi, quil, the Saturday rubbish and draw lots. Good drivers that draw further down the field would make it a Sunday afternoon to watch the box rather than the lawn. I think that qualifi, quil, Saturday is just to sell TV rights and make more money.

.mark

11,104 posts

284 months

Monday 4th June 2001
quotequote all
When I used to race in saloon cars, the best/fastest guys used to start at the back and the novices used to be at the front, made for much more interesting racing as they fought their way through the traffic. It always does wonders for an F1 race if the front runner stalls or something like DC in Monaco.

GasBlaster

27,428 posts

287 months

Tuesday 5th June 2001
quotequote all
The only way to make current F1 exciting is to impose a rule whereby each driver has to complete one lap per race GOING THE OTHER WAY. Of course, skinnier tyres, reducing downforce and turbocharging would also work... As would making the top drivers drink Champagne BEFORE the race... Christ, I'm bored.. too much F1...