What do you think of GT/Purely Porsche

[fizz]

Do you think the magazine is too narrow in focus?

Do you think they should be a little more GT?

[domster]

I think the content is pretty lame. Not much depth to the one I read (the RS vs GT3 issue). It seems like they did their research on the internet and road tests over a five mile run.

Style over content if you ask me.

I have Evo on subscrption, buy Autocar when it's interesting, and 911&PW when I remember. That does it for me. Those guys know their sh!t.

[scottster]

My missus is more of a 911&PW purchaser than me, I just come home once a month and there's a copy on the table, and she cooks - bonus!

(ps: I do come home more than once a month actually but only that often to a new mag)

[dmsims]

If you like pictures I suppose it's OK
even then books are better

Otherwise it's inaccurate, shallow, . . . . .

[johnny senna]

This month's buying guide for 964 and 993 RS's was crap. A real missed opportunity. No depth at all. Same goes for the RUF 3400 S. Great car, crap article. If the Evo writers tried the same, it would be in a different league.

[airoom]

Any reason why they couldn't expand the GT part of the equation?