737 down in Russia.. 44 dead.
737 down in Russia.. 44 dead.
Author
Discussion

onyx39

Original Poster:

11,349 posts

179 months

Sunday 17th November 2013
quotequote all
A Boeing 737 belonging to a domestic Russian airline crashed Sunday while attempting to land at an airport in western Tatarstan, killing all 50 people on board, Russia's emergency situations ministry said.

"According to preliminary information, all the people on board the flight, 44 passengers and six crew members, were killed,'' a ministry spokeswoman told AFP.

"There were no children among the passengers,'' she added.

The local branch of the ministry said in an earlier statement that 44 people had died when the jet, arriving from Moscow's Domodedovo airport, crashed on landing in the city of Kazan at 7:25 pm (1525 GMT).

The Tatarstan Airlines plane "hit the runway and burst into flames", Russia's Investigative Committee said in a statement.

The news agency ITAR-TASS said the plane then "exploded'', quoting a local police source.

Local news agencies reported the plane had tried to land three times before crashing.

"According to preliminary information all 50 bodies of the victims were found at the scene of the crash,'' said an official at the local emergency medical centre.


http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/world/tatarstan-a...

Edited by onyx39 on Sunday 17th November 18:25

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

291 months

Sunday 17th November 2013
quotequote all
"Local news agencies reported the plane had tried to land three times before crashing."

B17NNS

18,506 posts

276 months

Sunday 17th November 2013
quotequote all


Says something like:
"I was a passenger of the flight on the very same plane 4 hours before, from Kazan to Moscow. Don't let those fool you that it was weather related or a pilot mistake, the airplane was broken, we almost crashed on landing at moscow."

From pprune.

KTF

10,625 posts

179 months

Sunday 17th November 2013
quotequote all
I'd like to see how SLF thinks they 'almost crashed' on landing but I guess the media doesn't care too much about checking that out.

Pprune is just beginning to get interested in it considering the news of the accident appeared on the wires just after 1600: http://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/527997-russian-...

onyx39

Original Poster:

11,349 posts

179 months

Sunday 17th November 2013
quotequote all
KTF said:
I'd like to see how SLF thinks they 'almost crashed' on landing but I guess the media doesn't care too much about checking that out.

Pprune is just beginning to get interested in it considering the news of the accident appeared on the wires just after 1600: http://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/527997-russian-...
I wonder if "almost crashed" is the same as a "go-around", which apparently they did twice before finally putting it in the ground.

dvs_dave

9,040 posts

254 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Video on that pprune thread of the crash looks it's in a dive straight into the ground. frown

onyx39

Original Poster:

11,349 posts

179 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
dvs_dave said:
Video on that pprune thread of the crash looks it's in a dive straight into the ground. frown
that video is of the Bagram 747 freighter crash


this is it: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b12_1384773205

Edited by onyx39 on Monday 18th November 13:44

oobster

7,677 posts

240 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Still looks like the plane hit the ground almost vertically though.

Munter

31,331 posts

270 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
oobster said:
Still looks like the plane hit the ground almost vertically though.
Before watching the video when I read that I thought people meant it stalled and belly flopped hard. The video appears to be nose in, tail up. I guess the flight recorders will reveal all.

dvs_dave

9,040 posts

254 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
onyx39 said:
that video is of the Bagram 747 freighter crash


this is it: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b12_1384773205
That's the vid that's linked to and what I was talking about. Not sure where you got the bagram link from?

Anyway, as I said, it looks like a nosedive into the ground

B17NNS

18,506 posts

276 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
dvs_dave said:
Anyway, as I said, it looks like a nosedive into the ground
Weird. I'd have thought a failed go around would be more of a tail strike

onyx39

Original Poster:

11,349 posts

179 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
B17NNS said:
dvs_dave said:
Anyway, as I said, it looks like a nosedive into the ground
Weird. I'd have thought a failed go around would be more of a tail strike
My thoughts exactly. Do we know where the vid was shot from, if it was from the airport, it was a very odd angle of attack.

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Failed attempt to land - followed by a go around - pilot climbs too steeply - aircraft stalls - nosedives into ground.

B17NNS

18,506 posts

276 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Failed attempt to land - followed by a go around - pilot climbs too steeply - aircraft stalls - nosedives into ground.
Makes sense.

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

291 months

Monday 18th November 2013
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Failed attempt to land - followed by a go around - pilot climbs too steeply - aircraft stalls - nosedives into ground.
Or a dropped wing (pick your cause) with it rolling vertical....

If you want to you can see the fin lights on in that horrible video.

RIP

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Tuesday 19th November 2013
quotequote all
I wonder were they experiencing some sort of instrument failure - like a misreading air speed indicator or artificial horizon?

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

291 months

Tuesday 19th November 2013
quotequote all
The CVR that wasn't a CVR

MitchT

17,114 posts

238 months

Wednesday 20th November 2013
quotequote all
Mojocvh said:
The CVR that wasn't a CVR
I've seen the notes on Aviation Herald about the CVR, but what isn't clear is whether it separated form its casing as a result of the impact or, maybe, there was no CVR there to begin with.

B17NNS

18,506 posts

276 months

Wednesday 20th November 2013
quotequote all
Russian CVR



Probably commandeered by flight crew for entertainment purposes.

onyx39

Original Poster:

11,349 posts

179 months

Saturday 23rd November 2013
quotequote all
No idea on the source of this.