Douglas Valley fined £40K for breaches in Health &Safety
Douglas Valley fined £40K for breaches in Health &Safety
Author
Discussion

glow worm

Original Poster:

7,406 posts

256 months

Thursday 31st October 2013
quotequote all
On the North West News tonight, Douglas Valley breakers fined £40k at Preston today. Employee severely burnt after fire from a van being scrapped.

sonnylad

1,165 posts

254 months

Thursday 31st October 2013
quotequote all
65K in total according to sky news:

A car salvage company has been fined £40,000 plus £25,000 costs after a mechanic was engulfed in flames underneath a van

New POD

3,851 posts

179 months

Thursday 31st October 2013
quotequote all
Judging by their adverts for salvage cars and Parts on Ebay, it doesn't surprise me.

I know that high prices have no real link to having scant regard for Health and Safety, but for some reason it really doesn't surprise me.

NTEL

5,051 posts

269 months

Thursday 31st October 2013
quotequote all
To be honest, I'm surprised by this. Last time I went there was in 2008 searching for parts for my crashed Tasmin race car. All the cars were stacked on big shelves and I wasn't allowed to climb up to look. They got every car down with an FLT. When the parts were found, their own people took them off the car. H&S seemed ok at that time........I suppose the guy involved in this terrible incident was using a gas axe??????

Got to say though, their prices really took the piss!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and I would never use them again!


Edited by NTEL on Thursday 31st October 21:37

Getsis

1,550 posts

245 months

Conian

8,030 posts

230 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
They can afford it, as this seems to be the average price of any part I've ever enquired about from them.

Except a leather interior, that was reasonable.

tvrboy55

185 posts

199 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
i have seen the footage and i can't understand,how could a company is resposible for their worker to be, behaving eresposibly for his own safty. every machnics works under a car ramps. what should he have been wearing, a astrunuots suit. please explain.

phillpot

17,508 posts

212 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
tvrboy55 said:
i have seen the footage and i can't understand,how could a company is resposible
quote "The company had no fire alarms or detectors " could be a start?

Laser Sag

2,860 posts

272 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
tvrboy55 said:
i have seen the footage and i can't understand,how could a company is resposible for their worker to be, behaving eresposibly for his own safty. every machnics works under a car ramps. what should he have been wearing, a astrunuots suit. please explain.
The company has a responsibility to put in place sufficient safety measures to ensure any work being carried out is done so as safely as possible.
Would guess that there should be adequate ventilation to prevent build up of flammable gases and fuel tanks should be emptied correctly not by drilling a hole in the tank.

By the same measure the operative should assess the job and the safety of doing it and should not have continued working in a potentially unsafe environment.

His penalty is a lot worse than a fine for the company.

Edited by Laser Sag on Friday 1st November 12:42

tvrboy55

185 posts

199 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
so, the oprative is partly to blame for his own actions, knowing he is working with imflamable liquid. and he has caused the fire in the first place. he did not follow the rules, is he a novice, or is he a prick.

QBee

22,438 posts

173 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
The employer is responsible for ensuring the safety of all employees. Simple as that. The employee may have contributed to how own accident in this case, but it was the employer's responsibility to make sure that he wasn't putting himself in danger , was properly trained etcetc. The younger the employee, the greater the responsibility.

Try being in the construction industry these days - whole construction sites get closed down on the spot if they fail an unannounced health and safety inspection. And one worker without hard hat and safety boots would be enough.

But on the positive side, there has been a dramatic reduction in deaths and serious injuries in the last 20 years on building sites.

sarbec

514 posts

217 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
NTEL said:
To be honest, I'm surprised by this. Last time I went there was in 2008 searching for parts for my crashed Tasmin race car. All the cars were stacked on big shelves and I wasn't allowed to climb up to look. They got every car down with an FLT. When the parts were found, their own people took them off the car. H&S seemed ok at that time........I suppose the guy involved in this terrible incident was using a gas axe??????

Got to say though, their prices really took the piss!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and I would never use them again!


Edited by NTEL on Thursday 31st October 21:37
Yep Dave your probably spot on with the gas axe but the owners are liable no matter what the mechanics/disdismantlers decide to use because you have to have eyes in the back of your head if you employ people

heightswitch

6,322 posts

279 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
And the moral...
Don't employ a tt that thinks drilling a hole in a fuel tank is a normal or proper thing to do...

Fine the company for allowing such practise by all means..but in the same vein don't just pay compo to the thick tt either..

Health and safety act etc works both ways with equal responsibility on both parties??

Personally I think the company should have been prosecuted with respect to employment law. There are rules to be followed with regard to the employment of learning impaired and mentally retarded persons after all :-)


N.


Edited by heightswitch on Friday 1st November 16:19

TOV!E

2,016 posts

263 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
tvrboy55 said:
so, the oprative is partly to blame for his own actions, knowing he is working with imflamable liquid. and he has caused the fire in the first place. he did not follow the rules, is he a novice, or is he a prick.
Well said, still it must have hurt

phillpot

17,508 posts

212 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
And if the "thick tcensoredt" is desparate for a job and boss says "get them tanks empty 'kin rapid, never mind 'kin about doing it the proper way this is the quick way, or you won't have a job tomorrow"?

we don't know all the facts, it may not have been like that, and yes he should have refused but.......


Two sides to ever story scratchchin

heightswitch

6,322 posts

279 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
phillpot said:
And if the "thick tcensoredt" is desparate for a job and boss says "get them tanks empty 'kin rapid, never mind 'kin about doing it the proper way this is the quick way, or you won't have a job tomorrow"?

we don't know all the facts, it may not have been like that, and yes he should have refused but.......


Two sides to ever story scratchchin
phil.
Would you drill a hole into a full fuel tank regardless of who told you??
Sorry this is darwin award territory here smile

N.

Laser Sag

2,860 posts

272 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
phillpot said:
And if the "thick tcensoredt" is desparate for a job and boss says "get them tanks empty 'kin rapid, never mind 'kin about doing it the proper way this is the quick way, or you won't have a job tomorrow"?

we don't know all the facts, it may not have been like that, and yes he should have refused but.......


Two sides to ever story scratchchin
Lets see drill a hole into a fuel tank with explosive and flammable tendencies or don't come back tomorrow, sorry but no brainer the guys health is a site more important to him than potentially being dead before tomorrow surely.

tvrboy55

185 posts

199 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
we know he is not a novice nor a under age. he is a fully qualified machanic, so he must gone to the collage for his qualification. his tutor has not teached him to drill hole in the fuel tank, and i don't think the company has either.their must be something wrong somewhere. guys like him cost the componies a lot of monnies in bankruptcies, in compo and in fines.

phillpot

17,508 posts

212 months

Friday 1st November 2013
quotequote all
heightswitch said:
philMike.
Would you drill a hole into a full fuel tank regardless of who told you??
Sorry this is darwin award territory here smile

N.
No I certainly wouldn't but there are people, even thicker than me, who just perhaps would believe someone if told "we do it all the time, it's not a problem" ?


And I wouldn't do this either


Nor this


There are stupid people out there who do stupid things whether in a rush, under pressure from the boss etc etc or they are just stupid .

Edited by phillpot on Friday 1st November 18:54

Tarmacshredder

135 posts

159 months

Saturday 2nd November 2013
quotequote all
I have bought a number of items off Steve Strange/Douglas Valley and the prices I paid I though were more than fair and I was more than happy to pay for parts I could not get anywhere else for similar money or at all.
They have always been very helpful, polite, professional with prompt delivery and I wouldn't hesitate to recommend them to others.
Without knowing all the facts people are guessing as to how it happened and the reasons behind it. Nearly all vehicle dismantlers drill a hole in the tanks to drain them, all fluids now have to be drained fully and this is the only way it can be done so that they are not fined. Try buying a second hand tank from a vehicle dismantlers and you will realise that it is the norm. Working on vehicles is always going to be a dangerous job add to this the vehicles that this individual was working on would have been accident damaged, there are many more risks and complications.