Best value...
Author
Discussion

steve singh

Original Poster:

3,995 posts

202 months

Sunday 20th October 2013
quotequote all
Debate between a few friends, just say £23k to spend on a car.

2003 996 turbo tip -60k miles
2008 E92 M3 - 40k miles
2005 997

Which out the three would still be worth the most 3 years down the line (ignore running costs)?

csmith319

372 posts

192 months

Sunday 20th October 2013
quotequote all
Probably not the M3... Probably the 996.

Carl_Docklands

15,831 posts

291 months

Sunday 20th October 2013
quotequote all
How about an M3 CSL?

They made an awful lot of all three cards you listed but I would imagine the C2S would holds it money better than the Turbo based on numbers produced and likely buyers.

g7jhp

7,033 posts

267 months

Sunday 20th October 2013
quotequote all
steve singh said:
Debate between a few friends, just say £23k to spend on a car.

2003 996 turbo tip -60k miles
2008 E92 M3 - 40k miles
2005 997

Which out the three would still be worth the most 3 years down the line (ignore running costs)?
You'd be better to consider the total cost over the period, not just what it would to worth.


mollytherocker

14,464 posts

238 months

Sunday 20th October 2013
quotequote all
steve singh said:
Debate between a few friends, just say £23k to spend on a car.

2003 996 turbo tip -60k miles
2008 E92 M3 - 40k miles
2005 997

Which out the three would still be worth the most 3 years down the line (ignore running costs)?
I would put money on it being the 996 turbo.

steve singh

Original Poster:

3,995 posts

202 months

Sunday 20th October 2013
quotequote all
Interesting responses...I put forward the following...

996 turbo - buy for £23k, worth £14k in 3 years time (£9k lost)

E92 m3 - buy for £23k, worth £11k in 3 years time (£12k lost)

997 - buy for £23k, worth £11k in 3 years time (£12k lost)

However my Porsche owning friend believes a 996 turbo with less than 100k miles on the clock would never be worth less than £20k, but feels over a 3yr cycle total cost of ownership would be...(maintenance + depreciation)

Turbo - £12k (3k dep + 9k maintenance)

M3 - £15k (12k dep + 3k maintenance)







Edited by steve singh on Sunday 20th October 17:44

lotus211

2,961 posts

214 months

Sunday 20th October 2013
quotequote all
steve singh said:
Interesting responses...I put forward the following...

996 turbo - buy for £23k, worth £14k in 3 years time (£9k lost)

E92 m3 - buy for £23k, worth £11k in 3 years time (£12k lost)

997 - buy for £23k, worth £11k in 3 years time (£12k lost)

However my Porsche owning friend believes a 996 turbo with less than 100k miles on the clock would never be worth less than £20k.
Well its the cheapest turbo currently on offer by some margin

griffter

4,143 posts

284 months

Sunday 20th October 2013
quotequote all
The m3 might hold its value well. Last of the normally aspirated m3s and the only one with a v8.

steve singh

Original Poster:

3,995 posts

202 months

Sunday 20th October 2013
quotequote all
griffter said:
The m3 might hold its value well. Last of the normally aspirated m3s and the only one with a v8.
That's a good shout.

steve singh

Original Poster:

3,995 posts

202 months

Sunday 20th October 2013
quotequote all
lotus211 said:
Well its the cheapest turbo currently on offer by some margin
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/porsche/911-turbo-996/2003-52-porsche-911-996-3-6-turbo-tiptronic-s-53000-miles-slate-grey/1757565

lotus211

2,961 posts

214 months

Sunday 20th October 2013
quotequote all
There u go bargain

steve singh

Original Poster:

3,995 posts

202 months

Sunday 20th October 2013
quotequote all
lotus211 said:
There u go bargain
Really?

How about the 25k x50 at tom hartley?

Helicopter123

8,831 posts

185 months

Sunday 20th October 2013
quotequote all
996tt the fastest by far, on paper, and in the real world.

997 a thing of beauty.

M3 with mods a great track day toy.

All great cars.

Best value probably a 997 at that price for me.

csmith319

372 posts

192 months

Sunday 20th October 2013
quotequote all
steve singh said:
That's a good shout.
True - but there are a LOT of them, which may mean that only the lowest mileage, newest ones hold good value. Bit like the E46 - the very best have held decent value, but ones that are used are pretty cheap. The new M3 / M4 will push them heavily after a couple of years - a lot of people couldn't care less about it being NA or turbo. Plus the new one is going to be lighter, slightly more powerful, loads more torque - could have a bit of 1M coupe DNA. Unless its a dog, there are enough E90s around to prevent silly prices like the 1M coupe.

911's have this sort of depreciation trough - they bottom out and come good. I think the 996 turbo may have bottomed out, or is very close to it. The 997 has a little way to go, but the normal 996's will cushion them to some extent.

Hence - M3 probably the most value lost, followed but the 997 and then the 996 Turbo - depending of course on how many miles are added.

6C4GTS

5,186 posts

207 months

Sunday 20th October 2013
quotequote all
steve singh said:
Interesting responses...I put forward the following...

996 turbo - buy for £23k, worth £14k in 3 years time (£9k lost)

E92 m3 - buy for £23k, worth £11k in 3 years time (£12k lost)

997 - buy for £23k, worth £11k in 3 years time (£12k lost)

However my Porsche owning friend believes a 996 turbo with less than 100k miles on the clock would never be worth less than £20k, but feels over a 3yr cycle total cost of ownership would be...(maintenance + depreciation)

Turbo - £12k (3k dep + 9k maintenance)

M3 - £15k (12k dep + 3k maintenance)
Can't see a 996 turbo dropping to 14K even midnight blue over terracotta tip on VCAR.
Also 9K for 3 years service and repairs is very pessimistic unless you buy from HWM and get Stevie Wonder to do your PPI.

Younez

1,057 posts

195 months

Sunday 20th October 2013
quotequote all
M3 BRUVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV

DJWuk

1,672 posts

210 months

Tuesday 29th October 2013
quotequote all
steve singh said:
lotus211 said:
Well its the cheapest turbo currently on offer by some margin
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/porsche/911-turbo-996/2003-52-porsche-911-996-3-6-turbo-tiptronic-s-53000-miles-slate-grey/1757565
Looks nice in that colour. Anyone got the background on that car out of interest ?

steve singh

Original Poster:

3,995 posts

202 months

Tuesday 29th October 2013
quotequote all
DJWuk said:
steve singh said:
lotus211 said:
Well its the cheapest turbo currently on offer by some margin
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/porsche/911-turbo-996/2003-52-porsche-911-996-3-6-turbo-tiptronic-s-53000-miles-slate-grey/1757565
Looks nice in that colour. Anyone got the background on that car out of interest ?
Sold.

IMI A

9,997 posts

230 months

Tuesday 29th October 2013
quotequote all
steve singh said:
DJWuk said:
steve singh said:
lotus211 said:
Well its the cheapest turbo currently on offer by some margin
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/porsche/911-turbo-996/2003-52-porsche-911-996-3-6-turbo-tiptronic-s-53000-miles-slate-grey/1757565
Looks nice in that colour. Anyone got the background on that car out of interest ?
Sold.
That looked like a really good buy if a decent car. Very nice colour. Even if you put another 50k miles on it can't see it being worth much less than it's sale price but you will spend £2-3k per year on it if using it as Porsche intended.

fastgerman

2,001 posts

224 months

Tuesday 29th October 2013
quotequote all
I'd guess if you could find them all at 23k, then in 3 years time (my crystal ball says):

996 Turbo will still be above 20k, however could cost you 10k-15k easily over 3 years
997 (if C2S) then you have done very well and will be worth 18k ish and cost 1-2k per year
M3 will lose 30-50% value and cost similar to the 997 to run

Others to consider:
996 C4S
993/964/930
M6/M5
RS4
AMG
Quattroporte if you're feeling brave :-)

Edited by fastgerman on Tuesday 29th October 16:38