Ambulance Chasers

Author
Discussion

PetrolTed

Original Poster:

34,443 posts

309 months

Monday 8th July 2002
quotequote all
I've had an approach from a firm of solicitors who have a department specialising in car accidents/personal injury stuff.

This sort of stuff generally gets my goat but it raises the question of whether anyone on the site wants access to this sort of service (and not via one of the TV advertised companies).

PH will make money out of it but I'm not sure if I want to associate the site with that type of service.

Comments/suggestions?

Paceracing

729 posts

272 months

Monday 8th July 2002
quotequote all
I think you summed it up very well in the title Ted. There is obviously a market for this type of service, but it does seem a little unethical IMHO.

Jas.

Imelda

793 posts

272 months

Monday 8th July 2002
quotequote all
quote:
This sort of stuff generally gets my goat


I'm with you on that Ted, but business is business.

I would also say that there are plenty of tales of close encounters with numpties on these boards so one day, someone may find it useful.

Bloody hell what am I saying?

Think I need a

JohnL

1,763 posts

271 months

Monday 8th July 2002
quotequote all
Hm. Its not exactly unreasonable for people to seek fair compensation if they've been injured.

On the other hand these types of lawyers aren't usually interested in 'fair', just in their percentage of as much as they can get.

If a driver is insured aren't they covered for driving related injury claims anyway through their car insurance?

What use is legal aid in these circumstances?

I'd have thought that in either insurance paying or legal aid paying, the lawyers would be more inclined to lean towards 'fair' as they wouldn't be on a percentage (which is the bit that I find annoying, that's why claims get silly) and also the people paying the bills would appoint appropriate lwayers anyway.

On the assumption that people on this site are by and large insured drivers, and so claims arising with any relevance to this site will be covered by their insurance - there's probably not a lot of relevance in these services. But I'm definitely making some sweeping generalisations here.

>> Edited by JohnL on Monday 8th July 23:17

CarZee

13,382 posts

273 months

Monday 8th July 2002
quotequote all
Put it up - offer it out, whatever. At the end of the day, if people use it, you may make a few quid.

If they don't, you won't.

But what is there to lose?

We'll all complain like hell of course, but that's what we do. Then one day, someone will sneak off and use them.. and if there's success, the story will be told and hey presto...

If they rip people off then the truth will out and you may need to reconsider your position.

Moral of the story: IMO, PH is big enough now that there'll always be moaning from some quarters whatever you do and there'll be plenty of quiet custom from others... and nothing ventured, nothing gained.

Bloody hell, goodbye scruples.. GregE240 would be proud

>> Edited by CarZee on Monday 8th July 23:20

GregE240

10,857 posts

273 months

Tuesday 9th July 2002
quotequote all
quote:

Bloody hell, goodbye scruples.. GregE240 would be proud


Shame....couldn't say I taught him all he knew

BTW....thanks M@H - have I suddenly reached the dizzy heights of head of conscience police ?

davidd

6,522 posts

290 months

Tuesday 9th July 2002
quotequote all
Ted, I think you should use it. All advertising raises income for the site which is good for all of us. One thing I would be aware of is other advertisers, whereas I'm sure most of us don't really give a toss what you put up (but none of those annoying pop up at the back windows please but can we have some adverts for seedy lap dancing bars??) some of your other advertisers might not be overly impressed. (thats a general comment related to taking lapdancing ads, I doubt they'll care about the claims people).

D.

JMGS4

8,756 posts

276 months

Tuesday 9th July 2002
quotequote all
Ted, IMHO you should avoid these rightly named ambulance chasers. If you are going to go with one of these companies I believe there is only one approved by the Bar Association, all the rest are just bloodsuckers. Perhaps that'd keep the perceived moral level of your site up??? and also help any PHer in trouble with a numpty??? All IMHO......
John

marki

15,763 posts

276 months

Tuesday 9th July 2002
quotequote all
I dislike all these companys stand for ,But take the money and run Ted , sell em space , so what i mean i would never buy a Lotus Elise phone cover but if you make some dosh out of it where is the problem in that

JMorgan

36,010 posts

290 months

Tuesday 9th July 2002
quotequote all
Your site. Put a link that doesn't work hidden in the bowels of oily pages.

REV-EREND

21,520 posts

290 months

Tuesday 9th July 2002
quotequote all
Take the money .. we can handle the ad's - so long as
their not pop up's...

pbrettle

3,280 posts

289 months

Tuesday 9th July 2002
quotequote all
There is a benefit for a small number of cases so it has to be useful for a limited number of people. However, it is people like this that are consistently and unstoppingly increasing our insurance premiums. For the unlucky few it is good, for the vast majority it is merely an opportunity to make money from the honest motorist.

Cheers,

Paul

mel

10,168 posts

281 months

Tuesday 9th July 2002
quotequote all
Fine take the money just can you please make sure it's one of the ones that the ad blocker software works on.

mondeoman

11,430 posts

272 months

Tuesday 9th July 2002
quotequote all
ooooh PHers in support of the Compensation Culture.... whatever next???

Sorry, but I don't agree with their business ethics at all - ATEOTD its us who pays thru increased premiums. Only yesterday we were talking about £2000 for a £1500 1.0l car on TPF&T.... and moaning like crazy about it! All due to "ambulance chasers" and the belief that its always someone elses fault.....

Your site Ted, so its your call......

Just one thing - beware CarZee claiming against you for RSI with all the posting that he does!

Neil Menzies

5,167 posts

290 months

Tuesday 9th July 2002
quotequote all
Dichotomy...

It's Ted's site, and he needs to make a living out of it, so if someone wants to throw money at him, its hard to decide not to take it.

But these ar$ewipes aren't after fair compensation, they're after a high percentage of any settlement, and more and more of the time just by threatening action, so the insurance companies, who we pay with premiums, are settling out of court to these sods, even if there's little or no blame.

Anything which throws business their way is implicitly putting up everyone's insurance, so morally, I'd say no.

If you think you've got a genuine injury compensation claim, talk to a decent lawyer, not a scumbag.

All IMHO.

CarZee

13,382 posts

273 months

Tuesday 9th July 2002
quotequote all
Why not get a firm of solicitors interested in couter-suing the ambulance chasers? That way when we bludgeon someone who breaks into our house to steal our kit, and they sue us, we can whip their pikey asses in court too

To anyone who's moaning about unethical blah blah blah.. well unless Ted fancies himself as the next King Canute, there's no way he can be expected to single handedly make any difference to the tide of legal effluent washing up on the shore.

People will use these services, whether Ted promotes one of them here or not. Besides, if Ted can offer the services of a company more ethically based (this is a firm of solicitors with a department which specialises in the area, not built from the ground up as ambulance chasers) service than Blames Direct et al then all the better.

>> Edited by CarZee on Tuesday 9th July 09:45

CarZee

13,382 posts

273 months

Tuesday 9th July 2002
quotequote all
quote:
Just one thing - beware CarZee claiming against you for RSI with all the posting that he does!
Don't think PH can be blamed for the RSI :coffeebeans:

>> Edited by CarZee on Tuesday 9th July 09:42

ap_smith

1,997 posts

272 months

Tuesday 9th July 2002
quotequote all
Sorry guys, but I can't support this type of advertising.

Let's face it, there has been enough blasting of the ever increasing litigious nature of the UK, and here we go encouraging it. The subject matter of the PH forums have been subject to a little censorship recently (probably to its benefit) so perhaps the same morals should be applied to the advertising on the site.

Either way, these people p*ss me off, and I don't want to see adverts from them every time I come to post on my favorite site.

CarZee, what on earth has happened to you? Old age? Grey hairs? Turned to the dark side? You'll be working in marketing next.

plotloss

67,280 posts

276 months

Tuesday 9th July 2002
quotequote all
I dont think it can hurt to put the ad on, like everyone else has said business is business. The only thing you can do is cut the ad if you find they are unethical. I cant for one minute see that its going to affect your traffic in an adverse way so fill yer boots so to speak.

Matt.

pbrettle

3,280 posts

289 months

Tuesday 9th July 2002
quotequote all
quote:

You'll be working in marketing next.



Or worse - sales....