New cars announced for Wilton House 2013
Because you can never see enough supercars, right?

With a triumvirate of Pagani Zondas, a Ferrari 599 GTO and a Lamborghini Aventador Roadster already confirmed, there was never going to be a shortage of mouth-watering metal.
But now there's more. Four RUFs will be at Wilton, including a Jaguar D-Type will make an appearance and McLaren will again celebrate its 50th anniversary with an exhibition of its classic and contemporary models. There are now over 400 cars registered for next month's event, which will also include an Audi R18 E-Tron Quattro with Allan McNish.
Taking place on Sunday August 4, the 2013 Wilton Classis and Supercar is just over two weeks away. General admission tickets are still available here and cost £15 for adults, £7 for children and under-5s get in for free. See you there!
Pic: Colin Smart
I take it you missed out totally on English grammar and comprehension at school?
It clearly should read "Four RUFs will be at Wilton, a Jaguar D-Type will make an appearance and McLaren will again celebrate its 50th anniversary with an exhibition of its classic and contemporary models" - hardly an unforgivable sin in an online world without full-time paid editors. But, perhaps you were offering to fund a full-time editor position and carelessly forgot to mention that? If so, thank you. We readers appreciate your generosity.
I take it you missed out totally on English grammar and comprehension at school?
I take it you missed out totally on English grammar and comprehension at school?
What's the general opinion of Wilton House as a day out? Am I gonna be disappointed after too much Goodwood?
1) Who decided to actually paint an otherwise pleasant Bugatti Veyron with that mess?
2) Why is a relatively modern German GT car paired with a 56 year old British strategic bomber that was taken out of service before the modern Bugatti company was created?
I really am curious, especially on the pairing. It seems as odd as putting a picture of a Pagani Zonda with a Boeing B-47 Stratojet or a Spyker C8 with a Tupolev Tu-95 "Bear".
I don't get the apparent fascination for the Vulcan but, everybody has their quirks, I guess.
1) Who decided to actually paint an otherwise pleasant Bugatti Veyron with that mess?
2) Why is a relatively modern German GT car paired with a 56 year old British strategic bomber that was taken out of service before the modern Bugatti company was created?
I really am curious, especially on the pairing. It seems as odd as putting a picture of a Pagani Zonda with a Boeing B-47 Stratojet or a Spyker C8 with a Tupolev Tu-95 "Bear".
2) The Veyron was at RNAS Yeovilton's Air Day recently (on promotional duties) and the opportunity to photograph it with the Vulcan was simply too good to resist. A simple case of 'why not?'
I don't get the apparent fascination for the Vulcan but, everybody has their quirks, I guess.
[/quote]
Seriously? You got to be joking right? I mean you must be? Are you a man or a woman? You like cars obviously as you wouldn't be on PH, so why no interest in what is one of the coolest machines ever made! Right now I would be seriously questioning one's manliness and maybe a good thrashing in order with some birch leaves, sniff some Castrol R whilst standing next to a Vulcan taking off to reconfirm your manliness in all things frickin awesome!!!
Now, an SR-71? Sure. A Concorde? Certainly. An XB-70? Extremely. A Boeing B-17? Bombastically. A U-2? U Bet. A Hawker Harrier? Heck yes. A Sikorsky S-42 Flying Boat? Swimmingly.
But an Avro Vulcan? Why on EARTH would you class that as "one of the coolest machines ever made"? Seriously. I can't think of any reason I'd care about it even as much as a Brewster Buffalo.
Has there ever been a more ugly motorcar? Yes I know there have been some disasters, but trying to graft a 30s iconic radiator shape onto the front of the dreadfully contrived "super car" shape, what were they thinking? In the 30s the radiator shape was functional, designed to front a minimal engine cover, today it is merely an affectation, just like the use on the name, with no connection to the old company or man.
In the photo the Vulcan looks great as it was designed to do a job as efficiently as possible, the car looks ridiculous as is usual with super cars, as it was designed to impress the impressionable but jaded footballer, or an over rich fool.
Bad English grammar.
Hate for anything popular to gain attention.
Veyrons are vulgar.
Organised car shows are rubbish.
Makes the Daily Mail comments section seem mild, unopinionated and polite.
Now then, Wilton House? Anyone got any constructive opinions?
Now, an SR-71? Sure. A Concorde? Certainly. An XB-70? Extremely. A Boeing B-17? Bombastically. A U-2? U Bet. A Hawker Harrier? Heck yes. A Sikorsky S-42 Flying Boat? Swimmingly.
But an Avro Vulcan? Why on EARTH would you class that as "one of the coolest machines ever made"? Seriously. I can't think of any reason I'd care about it even as much as a Brewster Buffalo.
That is why its a amazing plane - "the Vulcan affect!" If you haven't experienced it I suggest you do before its too late, the nearest thing to Concorde and equally as impressive.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/0571247954
As said before, the Vulcan affect is just addictive.
XM655 is stored / parked / hangered at Wellesbourne Airfield which is about 5 miles from where I live. Everytime I travel in to town I pass it and it just looks amazing.
Sure, it probably isn't the most successful aircraft in the world, but it sure is one of the most impressive to see fly.
Gassing Station | Events & Meetings | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




