P-40 kittyhawk found in desert, what's happened to it.
P-40 kittyhawk found in desert, what's happened to it.
Author
Discussion

Vince70

Original Poster:

1,944 posts

223 months

Friday 10th May 2013
quotequote all
With all the current talk about the Dornier 17 being recovered from the Goodwin sands recently, I just wondered if anyone has any information on the P-40 Kittyhawk which was found in the western desert last year.

I just wondered if it made it back to Blighty or is it being restored.

HoHoHo

15,398 posts

279 months

Friday 10th May 2013
quotequote all
I think it's still there however being slowly ripped apart and looted by locals frown

There was a story in the Daily Wail day before yesterday about bones being found nearby and whilst there's a chance they belong to the pilot, they can't identify using DNA for whatever reason.

Elroy Blue

8,838 posts

221 months

Friday 10th May 2013
quotequote all
I THINK it's sat in a crate somewhere after being recovered by the Egyptians. I think the price demanded by the Egyptian authorities from the RAF museum went up considerably once they learned of its significance.

(But don't quote me)

Vince70

Original Poster:

1,944 posts

223 months

Friday 10th May 2013
quotequote all
I do hope it is crated up and hasn't been destroyed,
It's disgusting to think that if the pilot has been found that our goverment won't pay out and give him a decent burial with military honours.
Sounds typical of the goverment not to give a damn about our armed forces or heroes who have fought for this country.

HoHoHo

15,398 posts

279 months

Friday 10th May 2013
quotequote all
Vince70 said:
I do hope it is crated up and hasn't been destroyed,
It's disgusting to think that if the pilot has been found that our goverment won't pay out and give him a decent burial with military honours.
Sounds typical of the goverment not to give a damn about our armed forces or heroes who have fought for this country.
That's not the case - there are bones some distance away from the crash site and for technical reasons they can't identify them and therefore confirm they are definitely those of the pilot. Would be a bit embarrassing if we gathered them up, had a military funeral only to find out sometime later they belong to Mohammed Desert-Man!

Not a government not giving a damn at all.

jonnyb

2,590 posts

281 months

Friday 10th May 2013
quotequote all
There was an article about this in the times. Apparently the Egyptian authorities said there was no DNA recoverable on the bones. However, there is a team of pathology specialists on their way to Egypt to test the bones themselves.

Full article from The Times:

Relatives of an RAF pilot whose aircraft was found in the Sahara desert 70 years after it was reported missing are demanding that proper tests be carried out on human remains found near by.
Flight Sergeant Dennis Copping was on a routine flight in 1942, returning a P40 Kittyhawk fighter to an RAF base after repairs, when he got lost over the featureless desert and ran out of fuel. His perfectly preserved aircraft was found in the Western Desert, in Egypt, last year by an oil prospector.
A makeshift shelter close by, and signs of an attempt to repair the aircraft’s radio, suggested that the 24-year-old pilot had survived the crash and at some point had set off to look for help — never to be seen again.
Shortly after the discovery of the Kittyhawk, a team of Italian archaeologists found bones, along with scraps of a Second World War parachute, three miles from the crash site — but Flight-Sergeant Copping’s surviving relatives have been told that the Egyptian authorities have been unable to establish their identity.
His nephew, John Pryor-Bennett, was initially invited to fly to Egypt to supply a DNA sample, but was then told not to bother, as the bones no longer contained any DNA. However, that claim has been disputed by four forensic pathologists advising the family. They hope to travel to Cairo to examine the bones themselves, to give Mr Pryor-Bennett and his family a definitive answer.
Mr Pryor-Bennett, 62, from Kinsale, Co Cork, said: “I am appalled about how all of this has been handled. All the information that I have received since these bones were discovered last June has been misleading and vague.
“The people who found King Richard III were able to get a DNA sample from his bones, and they were over 600 years old. I can’t help feeling let down.”
Laurence Garey, an independent forensic anatomist who has worked at the University of Oxford and the University of Lausanne, disputed the claim that the bones were “too old” to contain DNA. “It is quite inconceivable and I cannot accept that it is true,” he said. “I have got DNA samples from bones far older than 70 years. DNA has been extracted from 60-million-year-old dinosaurs.”
Like its pilot, the Kittyhawk itself is reportedly missing once again in the desert. Its last known location was a storage container at El Alamein, scene of the 8th Army’s decisive victory over Rommel’s Afrika Korps.
The Royal Air Force Museum at Hendon, North London, has been in negotiations with the Egyptian authorities in an effort to have the aircraft returned to Britain.

IanMorewood

4,309 posts

277 months

Friday 10th May 2013
quotequote all
The desert isn't a good place to leave bones though. Hope for the families sake they can extract enough of a sample to get a match (or not).

Simpo Two

92,662 posts

294 months

Friday 10th May 2013
quotequote all
I wouldn't trust an Egyptian pathologist!

Dental records maybe?

Seems they've made a complete hash of it.

FourWheelDrift

92,234 posts

313 months

dr_gn

16,924 posts

213 months

dr_gn

16,924 posts

213 months

Thursday 4th January 2018
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
Might be a bit glossy, but I don't think the colours themselves are too far off, its their outlines and the markings that are wrong (the remains of the originals can be seen fairly clearly on the desert photos). Apart from the wheels that appear to be way too small, and the fact it should have been left unrestored IMO, it wouldn't be far away from a decent exhibit. Trouble is, they appear to have deliberately ignored the history of that specific aircraft, since much more is known about it and it's pilot. I wonder if things would have have been presented differently if the pilot/aircraft had been Egyptian?


Edited by dr_gn on Thursday 4th January 11:19

Ayahuasca

27,580 posts

308 months

Sunday 7th January 2018
quotequote all
Apparently we swapped a Spitfire for the Kittyhawk; but the deal didn't happen. The Spit is said to be still in the U.K. somewhere although owned by the Egyptians.

I don't have a particular problem with the restoration. Their plane, their desert, their call.




Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Sunday 7th January 2018
quotequote all
I bet they wouldn't treat an ancient Egyptian artefact the same way.

Yertis

19,707 posts

295 months

Sunday 7th January 2018
quotequote all
Ayahuasca said:
Apparently we swapped a Spitfire for the Kittyhawk; but the deal didn't happen. The Spit is said to be still in the U.K. somewhere although owned by the Egyptians.

I don't have a particular problem with the restoration. Their plane, their desert, their call.
Do you feel the same way about listed buildings?

smileymikey

1,446 posts

255 months

Sunday 7th January 2018
quotequote all
I think the comment " I'm sure we have some Egyptian artefacts in our museums that they would like back" Brings a little perspective to any argument about our rights to it and the treatment of human remains to be honest.

Simpo Two

92,662 posts

294 months

Sunday 7th January 2018
quotequote all
Except that if they weren't safe in British museums for the world to view, treasure and appreciate, they'd have been lost in some inter-tribal war or sold by bandits long ago.

Ayahuasca

27,580 posts

308 months

Monday 8th January 2018
quotequote all
Yertis said:
Ayahuasca said:
Apparently we swapped a Spitfire for the Kittyhawk; but the deal didn't happen. The Spit is said to be still in the U.K. somewhere although owned by the Egyptians.

I don't have a particular problem with the restoration. Their plane, their desert, their call.
Do you feel the same way about listed buildings?
Was this a listed building? Who are we to get upset at what foreigners do with their own property?

Simpo Two

92,662 posts

294 months

Monday 8th January 2018
quotequote all
Ayahuasca said:
Was this a listed building? Who are we to get upset at what foreigners do with their own property?
Who said the P40 belongs to Egypt? Parking it in a desert doesn't transfer ownership does it? Did they claim salvage rights?

Ayahuasca

27,580 posts

308 months

Tuesday 9th January 2018
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Ayahuasca said:
Was this a listed building? Who are we to get upset at what foreigners do with their own property?
Who said the P40 belongs to Egypt? Parking it in a desert doesn't transfer ownership does it? Did they claim salvage rights?
I don't think there was ever any doubt over the legal ownership.


Boatbuoy

1,975 posts

191 months

Tuesday 9th January 2018
quotequote all
Ayahuasca said:
Simpo Two said:
Ayahuasca said:
Was this a listed building? Who are we to get upset at what foreigners do with their own property?
Who said the P40 belongs to Egypt? Parking it in a desert doesn't transfer ownership does it? Did they claim salvage rights?
I don't think there was ever any doubt over the legal ownership.
I imagine it's a similar legal issue to the P-61 that crashed in Papua (now part of Indonesia) - an exert from the story to recover the airframe states:

"Finally, in 1983 the United States Air Force officially signed off in writing any interest they had in the aircraft, officially stating that the P-61 was considered one of the "spoils of war" under treaties signed ending World War II. The aircraft was thus owned by the country upon whose soil it rested."

Read the full story here (if you feel so inclined): http://www.maam.org/p61/p61_recovery.htm