De-cat. Ever been caught?

De-cat. Ever been caught?

Author
Discussion

pinkney

Original Poster:

1,010 posts

270 months

Sunday 30th June 2002
quotequote all
Has anyone here been pulled and been fined for running a de-catted car? I know the penalty is fairly extensive (£5k) so would like some reassurance that it's unlikely to b caught.

JamesG

128 posts

271 months

Sunday 30th June 2002
quotequote all
Since when has that been illegal!

Post 1992 cars just need to get their cats put back on to pass the MOT emissions test.

(nice car, by the way )

James.

pinkney

Original Poster:

1,010 posts

270 months

Sunday 30th June 2002
quotequote all
Cheers James,

I have always been under the impression that it was illegal for post '92 cars to run without the cats. I know that you need to replace them in order to pass the MOT, but if the car will not pass its MOT without the cats surely that would make it illegal to run?

However, I hope I am wrong.

Dan

philshort

8,293 posts

283 months

Sunday 30th June 2002
quotequote all
I think if stopped and tested, you have a number of days to get the car "fixed" and retested - but I could be talking through the pipehole of my p***k as usual. Who's going to know?

I think the main problem is that in the event of a serious accident, its one thing the insurance companies are wise to and it would be an instant no cover situation whe their inspector discovers a lack of cats - unless you let them know what you have done.

Tabs

985 posts

278 months

Sunday 30th June 2002
quotequote all
In Northants they do random roadside emissions tests. Plod pull you into a lay-bye and you're greeted by ministry officers and their portable kit. How would you get on then!

simonelite501

1,440 posts

274 months

Sunday 30th June 2002
quotequote all
Well that's Northants of my christmas card list then!
My Elite just scapes through the MOT emission test after a massive amount of tinkering every year.
I wonder how the Rodders get on when the Billing Aquadrome show is on?!

clositintelctual

22 posts

268 months

Sunday 30th June 2002
quotequote all
cars made before april 1992 do not need to have a cat fitted. it was only compulsory after this date, I think you all know that you can get a replacement bolt in pipe that gets rid of the foul smelling cat, just spend 5 minutes putting youre cat back on for its mot. Is it worth it though for only a gain of about 3% power. I think it is extremely unlikely to get tested at the roadside by a government body as there currently isn't one capable of doing this.

Niggle

600 posts

272 months

Sunday 30th June 2002
quotequote all
Just a thought, but wouldn't this be treated the same as fitting a sports exhaust, or a race can on a bike ?

If you get caught, plod issue you with a rectification notice, and you get 7 days to get the vehicle tested by a MOT station.

Dave_H

996 posts

289 months

Sunday 30th June 2002
quotequote all
There's a lot of pro's about removing the cats. A mate of mine runs an 1989 Camero, he legally removed the cats, the performance and fuel bills improved a fair bit.

There's a lot of controversy about cats, they don't really work until the engine's warmed up, they are in exsitence mainly to please the lentel eating bearded tree huggers, and if they cause a lower MPG are they really "saving the planet"

johnny senna

4,062 posts

278 months

Sunday 30th June 2002
quotequote all
You have to tell the insurance company what you have done. Privilege added 13% to my premium when I fitted a non-cat system that would raise the power by 2-3%. If you crash it and you haven't told them about the modification, you're in trouble.