ISA or Sipp
Author
Discussion

tali1

Original Poster:

5,286 posts

231 months

Thursday 11th April 2013
quotequote all
I already have invested in funds ISAs over the years should i invest in a SIPP ? it seems to like an ISA - but with the govt throwing in 20% -or should i use up my annual allowance still on more fund Isas
I am aware that a SIPP lacks flexibility and has restrictions-i'm okay with that
However , i already have a public sector pension and the impression i got was that i don't need a SIPP -although i can't see why this is relevant really if you can grab another 20% ? Also i have heard it is better for higher rate taxpayers- but to me again -that's still 20%
Also is there a 1k minimum investment per fund as in fund isas?
Or have i got it wrong?

Newc

2,195 posts

212 months

Thursday 11th April 2013
quotequote all
A SIPP is a pension wrapper (Self Invested Personal Pension). The carrot is tax relief on your contributions. The stick is significant restrictions on accessing your money; in particular nothing at all before 55 and lots of rules after then.

An ISA is a tax break for savings. No tax releif, but no restrictions on getting your cash if you need to.

I am not a regulated adviser and this is not advice, but I would always fill my ISA allowance first before even considering extra pension contributions.

thekingisdead

320 posts

163 months

Thursday 11th April 2013
quotequote all
Mostly depends at what rate you pay income tax. As a basic rate tax payer there is little difference between an ISA or pension, the pension you get tax relief on paying in, but tax on the income. The ISA pays tax on the way in, but no tax on income drawn from it.

As a higher rate tax payer the pension is better option, 40% relief on payments in, and unless your investments do really well, most only pay tax from a pension at 20%

Pension has the advantage of being able to draw down 25% tax free at retirement, but the downside is your money can't be touched for many years, unlike an ISA

As you're asking about a SIPP I'm assuming there are no employer contributions to consider, which would make a pension a better bet

uknick

1,066 posts

214 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
As you are in a public sector pension, why not pay additional amounts into that?


tali1

Original Poster:

5,286 posts

231 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
uknick said:
As you are in a public sector pension, why not pay additional amounts into that?
Well according to my colleagues if i put in AVCs -i sort of lose the LGPS status as AVCs are dealt with by Prudential -in other words a private external institution .Is this true or nonsense?

Jockman

18,414 posts

190 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
tali1 said:
Well according to my colleagues if i put in AVCs -i sort of lose the LGPS status as AVCs are dealt with by Prudential -in other words a private external institution .Is this true or nonsense?
Possibly true - I know that they deal with AVCs differently now, in a less benign light to reflect prevailing conditions smile


tali1

Original Poster:

5,286 posts

231 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
Jockman said:
tali1 said:
Well according to my colleagues if i put in AVCs -i sort of lose the LGPS status as AVCs are dealt with by Prudential -in other words a private external institution .Is this true or nonsense?
Possibly true - I know that they deal with AVCs differently now, in a less benign light to reflect prevailing conditions smile
Most of my work colleagues have been in LGPS for 20-40 years- a few did the AVCs to their cost they said.I thought perhaps they misinterpreted but seems not.

Countdown

49,519 posts

226 months

Friday 12th April 2013
quotequote all
AVCs are effectively a private pension. When you retire you use the money saved in AVCs to buy an annuity. The benefits of AVCs are nowhere near as good as the standard LGPS.

uknick

1,066 posts

214 months

Saturday 13th April 2013
quotequote all
tali1 said:
Well according to my colleagues if i put in AVCs -i sort of lose the LGPS status as AVCs are dealt with by Prudential -in other words a private external institution .Is this true or nonsense?
There are a number of ways to add to your pension. These include the AVCs you mention but also buying added years.

Have a look at the website

http://www.civilservice.gov.uk/pensions

The Leaper

5,720 posts

236 months

Saturday 13th April 2013
quotequote all
Incorrect website is mentioned above: that site is for members of the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme. The OP says he is a member of the Local Government Pension Scheme and the relevant webite is here:

www.lgps.org.uk/

R.

uknick

1,066 posts

214 months

Sunday 14th April 2013
quotequote all
The Leaper said:
Incorrect website is mentioned above: that site is for members of the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme. The OP says he is a member of the Local Government Pension Scheme and the relevant webite is here:

www.lgps.org.uk/

R.
My mistake.

tali1

Original Poster:

5,286 posts

231 months

Wednesday 17th April 2013
quotequote all
I'm thinking the consensus is always use up all your annual ISA allowance first.