200sx (S14a) – one of the last ones

200sx (S14a) – one of the last ones

Author
Discussion

jj.

Original Poster:

555 posts

276 months

Thursday 16th September 2004
quotequote all
A mate of mine is just about to make a purchase on one of the very last 200SX – on a 51 plate. It’s a touring Auto.

He’s asked my advice as it’s an Auto (I’ve got an auto in the 5-series – which works exceptionally well) – but he’s in two minds. He likes the idea of it, I think I’ve sold him on the idea of an auto, but does an auto suit this type of car…? On his test drive he said it worked well, but then a 15 min test drive (first time he’s driven an auto) he would say that.

Anyone own/owned one, and have pro’s and con’s of an auto in this particular car. I’m not sure how well it works with the Turbo lump under the bonnet, as surely before the turbo gets time to work it’s already changed gear – or am I wrong..?

Is this car best suited to a manual, or is the auto the one to have (there seems more Auto’s around than manuals).
jj

KITT

5,340 posts

247 months

Thursday 16th September 2004
quotequote all
The S14 has always stuck me as a bit of a cruising car as opposed to a sports car (that's not to say you can't modify it into something a little wilder ), so I'd say the auto probably does suit it. However, I've never driven or been in one so please ignore me

shadowninja

77,394 posts

288 months

Thursday 16th September 2004
quotequote all
um

dunno how a bmw gearbox works but the one on my skyline (ie a nissan box) will change up early if you dont push your foot down hard because it thinks you dont want to accelerate that hard. however, if you floor it, it will rev right to the red line, making full use of the turbo.

the s14a is a bit more comfy but still sporty.

shadowninja

77,394 posts

288 months

Thursday 16th September 2004
quotequote all
um

dunno how a bmw gearbox works but the one on my skyline (ie a nissan box) will change up early if you dont push your foot down hard because it thinks you dont want to accelerate that hard. however, if you floor it, it will rev right to the red line, making full use of the turbo.

the s14a is a bit more comfy but still sporty.

tuttle

3,427 posts

243 months

Thursday 16th September 2004
quotequote all
I've been up against auto s13's(modified) in my 'liner,it gave a very good account of itself.

BreadBin

10 posts

242 months

Saturday 18th September 2004
quotequote all
www.sxoc.com
The forum contains an absolute wealth of knowledge by far the best owners club/internet forum I have had anything to do with.

Dakkon

7,826 posts

259 months

Monday 20th September 2004
quotequote all
I had a manual S14a Touring, very nice but it is more of a GT than a sports car, personally I have never liked the idea of turbo's and auto's going together.

They are very well balanced, which is why you see so many in drifting competitions, good spec if you get the Touring and mine was very reliable, servicing is not too expensive. All round nice car, no room in the back for adults though, you will break their kneecaps

There is also www.200sx.org, New Zealand site, but the guy is very helpful if you email him.

My car did suffer from the strange rattle, when cold start the car, a very brief rattle is heard from engine bay, only happened when engine was cold and was never found or cured, this is known to happen on a lot of S14's, no one is really sure why, from saying exhaust, to the ceramic cat plates to heat shielding.

Erm, all I can really think of off the top of my head, take it for a decent test drive and see what you think.

Do be careful in the wet though, backend can be playful.

Pierscoe1

2,458 posts

267 months

Monday 20th September 2004
quotequote all
have often considered an S14a (or indeed an S15)..

was the rattle not just the timing chain (as opposed to rubber belt on most cars) being oil-less on startup?

BreadBin

10 posts

242 months

Tuesday 21st September 2004
quotequote all
It's the VVT pulley and yes it's down to oil pressure, should last no more than a couple of seconds.
They are lovely cars to drive if a little soft for my tastes (which is why mine is getting coilovers). They are also probably the most cost-effective, biggest bang-for-your-buck cars for tuning. 300bhp with sensible tweaking and no major mods (and reliably too) the most problematic part being a FMIC which involves some metal cutting and a tiny battery or relocation (of the battery) to the boot. Apex have a link-up with the SXOC and I believe plans are afoot to produce a FMIC that utilises the existing intercooler pipework. It costs £700-odd however

KITT

5,340 posts

247 months

Tuesday 21st September 2004
quotequote all
Just out of interest what are they like on fuel on an average commute into work?

jj.

Original Poster:

555 posts

276 months

Tuesday 21st September 2004
quotequote all
The particular one my mate was going to buy – ‘the auto’, he has now changed his mind. The seller was sticking to a certain price, which was (so he told me) right at the top end of the scale (for the car – and his budget), and the guy wasn’t interesting in moving, my mate would have brought it if it went £300 in his favour.

Also he checked servicing pricing with the main dealer, who told him, that, the particular car he was looking at, although on a 51 – plate (2001) was in fact manufactured in 1999!
jj

jap-car

628 posts

256 months

Wednesday 22nd September 2004
quotequote all
KITT said:
Just out of interest what are they like on fuel on an average commute into work?


I commute 15 miles each way to work from countryside to city centre. I'm fairly heavy footed and I get 25mpg from a manual S14 (lightly modified)

The DJ 27

2,666 posts

259 months

Wednesday 22nd September 2004
quotequote all
This is my ideal car at the moment, in that it's very tuneable, has a turbo and can be had for hot-hatch money. The insurance is bloody ridiculous though! Can't get a quote for under £2K

jap-car

628 posts

256 months

Thursday 23rd September 2004
quotequote all
The DJ 27 said:
This is my ideal car at the moment, in that it's very tuneable, has a turbo and can be had for hot-hatch money. The insurance is bloody ridiculous though! Can't get a quote for under £2K


Being an old(er) person and living in a low risk area I pay just over £300 fully comp from Adrian Flux with modifications declared

The DJ 27

2,666 posts

259 months

Friday 24th September 2004
quotequote all
You, Sir, are a git! Haven't really tried the specialists yet, since I'm a few months off being able to afford to change my car. Have a feeling that I won't be able to modify it even if I do get a sensible quote. Have my eye on the Option Motorsport stage 2 conversion. 290bhp in a stealth package

jap-car

628 posts

256 months

Monday 27th September 2004
quotequote all
The DJ 27 said:
You, Sir, are a git! Haven't really tried the specialists yet, since I'm a few months off being able to afford to change my car. Have a feeling that I won't be able to modify it even if I do get a sensible quote. Have my eye on the Option Motorsport stage 2 conversion. 290bhp in a stealth package


I'm not familiar with that package but I do know that around 280bhp is achievable very easily and cheaply (exhaust, induction, cold sparks, bleed valve for boost pressure, Walbro fuel pump, boost gauge). More than that gets a bit more expensive as you start running into limitaiations with the injectors and also require a Front-Mounted-Intercooler rather than the wing mounted standard unit.

Good look with your saving

tuttle

3,427 posts

243 months

Monday 27th September 2004
quotequote all
jap-car said:


bleed valve for boost pressure,



Nooooooo.Dont use a bleed valve.Boost pressure will spike,inconsistantly & unreliably all over the place.After fitting induction+exhaust mods,a boost controller+gauge would be a good starting point IMO.

>> Edited by tuttle on Monday 27th September 09:09

jap-car

628 posts

256 months

Monday 27th September 2004
quotequote all
tuttle said:

jap-car said:


bleed valve for boost pressure,




Nooooooo.Dont use a bleed valve.Boost pressure will spike,inconsistantly & unreliably all over the place.After fitting induction+exhaust mods,a boost controller+gauge would be a good starting point IMO.

>> Edited by tuttle on Monday 27th September 09:09


The one I was thinking of consists of a sprung ball-bearing which seats on a matching surface and thus forms a valve which opens at a pre-set pressure. This is placed in the pressure feed to the actuator and on the SX owners club is known as a "Bren device" as he is the guy who sells them. I believe you are right about bleed valves. I don't think the device I have described is a bleed valve but I don't know the correct name hence my mistake.

Cheers,

Robert

Dakkon

7,826 posts

259 months

Monday 27th September 2004
quotequote all
jap-car said:

tuttle said:


jap-car said:


bleed valve for boost pressure,





Nooooooo.Dont use a bleed valve.Boost pressure will spike,inconsistantly & unreliably all over the place.After fitting induction+exhaust mods,a boost controller+gauge would be a good starting point IMO.

>> Edited by tuttle on Monday 27th September 09:09



The one I was thinking of consists of a sprung ball-bearing which seats on a matching surface and thus forms a valve which opens at a pre-set pressure. This is placed in the pressure feed to the actuator and on the SX owners club is known as a "Bren device" as he is the guy who sells them. I believe you are right about bleed valves. I don't think the device I have described is a bleed valve but I don't know the correct name hence my mistake.

Cheers,

Robert


The man speaks the truth, bleed valves lead to boost spikes.....I know they cost more but a decent electronic boost controller is miles better.

Mr E

22,047 posts

265 months

Monday 27th September 2004
quotequote all
Dakkon said:



The man speaks the truth, bleed valves lead to boost spikes.....I know they cost more but a decent electronic boost controller is miles better.


Thirded. The device you mention is better than a bleed valve, but seriously I'd invest a couple of hundred badgers on a decent EBC.