What would your ideal camera be?
What would your ideal camera be?
Author
Discussion

FlossyThePig

Original Poster:

4,143 posts

272 months

Saturday 10th November 2012
quotequote all
There was a thread on the DPReview website recently where I thought the responses were mainly unimaginative. My contribution was very OTT so I will wait before I put a refined version here.

So what would your ideal camera be?

nick heppinstall

9,071 posts

309 months

Saturday 10th November 2012
quotequote all
One where every picture was in focus. Well to be honest I would be happy with 15%.

markmullen

15,877 posts

263 months

Saturday 10th November 2012
quotequote all
An Alpa 12 with a Phase One IQ180. Second choice would be a Linhof Techno with the same back.

(Everyone feverishly googles to see what the hell he's talking about).

Simpo Two

92,708 posts

294 months

Saturday 10th November 2012
quotequote all
A shutter release button on the side of my head so I can image-grab straight from my retinas.

Dogsey

4,301 posts

259 months

Saturday 10th November 2012
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
A shutter release button on the side of my head so I can image-grab straight from my retinas.
I agree, but can I add 10-2000mm zoom glasses?

...Mole...

2,780 posts

220 months

Sunday 11th November 2012
quotequote all
an Ebony 20x24



and a pack of slaves to carry it around for me.

NJH

3,021 posts

238 months

Sunday 11th November 2012
quotequote all
Very easy to answer this one, a cheaper Fuji X-pro but with better lag and jitter free EVF, continuous AF, buffering, speed etc. like a competitive sporty DSLR (7d/d300s) and the lenses to match which means all those already promised to be class leading.

Such a camera and system might actually happen in the next few years, who knows.

dxbtiger

4,545 posts

202 months

Sunday 11th November 2012
quotequote all
markmullen said:
An Alpa 12 with a Phase One IQ180. Second choice would be a Linhof Techno with the same back.

(Everyone feverishly googles to see what the hell he's talking about).
Indeed!

Having returned back from google, what would that set you back??

Speed addicted

6,328 posts

256 months

Sunday 11th November 2012
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
A shutter release button on the side of my head so I can image-grab straight from my retinas.
This.

Fordo

1,572 posts

253 months

Sunday 11th November 2012
quotequote all

A red epic, a pair of set of angenieux optimo DP zooms, and a set of zeiss superspeed primes.


RobbieKB

7,715 posts

212 months

Sunday 11th November 2012
quotequote all
One body that's twice as wide and can hold 2 lenses because I'm too lazy to switch all the time. hehe

MysteryLemon

4,968 posts

220 months

Sunday 11th November 2012
quotequote all
Full frame sensor, 18-400mm with continuous 1.2 aperture that fits in my pocket.

Perfectly impossible.

...Mole...

2,780 posts

220 months

Sunday 11th November 2012
quotequote all
dxbtiger said:
Indeed!

Having returned back from google, what would that set you back??
about £50-60k probably, pretty pointless unless you absolutely need the instant digital files, You will get equal or better resolution
with a 5x4 camera and a drum scanner for the film for a fraction of that cost.

Cock Womble 7

29,908 posts

259 months

Sunday 11th November 2012
quotequote all
This:



in this body:


Simpo Two

92,708 posts

294 months

Sunday 11th November 2012
quotequote all
Well that does open the door for a 'retro' DSLR I suppose...

dxbtiger

4,545 posts

202 months

Sunday 11th November 2012
quotequote all
...Mole... said:
about £50-60k probably
Holy st.

To answer the OP's question I'll be more than content to upgrade to the D7000 replacement when it arrives.

Gad-Westy

16,558 posts

242 months

Sunday 11th November 2012
quotequote all
NJH said:
Very easy to answer this one, a cheaper Fuji X-pro but with better lag and jitter free EVF, continuous AF, buffering, speed etc. like a competitive sporty DSLR (7d/d300s) and the lenses to match which means all those already promised to be class leading.

Such a camera and system might actually happen in the next few years, who knows.
This for me too. I have an X100 (I'm assuming fairly similar to the X-Pro but with a fixed lens). If the AF were better and a few other tweaks, I'd have no need for a DSLR.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Sunday 11th November 2012
quotequote all
markmullen said:
An Alpa 12 with a Phase One IQ180. Second choice would be a Linhof Techno with the same back.
I didnt have to google... But yes.

Or a touchscreen digital back for my canon lenses, something like the EOS M with a FF sensor.

Bacardi

2,235 posts

305 months

Sunday 11th November 2012
quotequote all
markmullen said:
An Alpa 12 with a Phase One IQ180. Second choice would be a Linhof Techno with the same back.
Not bad choices at all, but as I seem to be moving away from stills, I'd have to say one of these is on my shopping list...


(ETA, I had missed Fordo had beat me to it!)

Edited by Bacardi on Sunday 11th November 20:54

flat-planedCrank

3,697 posts

232 months

Sunday 11th November 2012
quotequote all
Bacardi said:
markmullen said:
An Alpa 12 with a Phase One IQ180. Second choice would be a Linhof Techno with the same back.
Not bad choices at all, but as I seem to be moving away from stills, I'd have to say one of these is on my shopping list...


(ETA, I had missed Fordo had beat me to it!)

Edited by Bacardi on Sunday 11th November 20:54
Least it got just a little more attainable recently wink - http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2012/11/red-camera-...