3rd Chinese stealth prototype spotted
3rd Chinese stealth prototype spotted
Author
Discussion

jbi

Original Poster:

12,700 posts

233 months

Monday 22nd October 2012
quotequote all
Pennant number 2003 in the wild. Sporting a new nose cone with room for a dedicated EOS/IRST system.







How long now until serial production is the question...

mattiselvis

991 posts

250 months

Monday 22nd October 2012
quotequote all
Big difference between something that looks like a stealth fighter and something that is a stealth fighter.

MikeGTi

2,716 posts

230 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2012
quotequote all
It looks like an out of proportion F-35.

Ahhh espionage.

Elroy Blue

8,838 posts

221 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2012
quotequote all
A significant numer of the companies involved in both the F22 and JSF were subject to cyber attack. A report found all the details of the aircraft had been compromised. Wonder who that was????

LotusOmega375D

9,313 posts

182 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2012
quotequote all
Elroy Blue said:
A significant numer of the companies involved in both the F22 and JSF were subject to cyber attack. A report found all the details of the aircraft had been compromised. Wonder who that was????
Well in that case at least the Americans should know what they're potentially up against! Imitation can be counter-productive to some extent.

jbi

Original Poster:

12,700 posts

233 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2012
quotequote all
yup... it seems to borrow from both f-22 and f-35 designs... but also is radically different in other areas.

The nose is similar to the F-22
The engine intakes are lifted straight from the F-35

The wings, canards and tail however are something completely new. and the engines in their current form are obviously not optimised for stealth.

Design philosophy for this thing seems to be massive range, high speed and low frontal aspect stealth. Good for long range strikes and loitering.

They are using both Russian and Chinese engines in the prototypes, although I imagine they will be using domestic engines in the production version once the bugs are worked out.

Mave

8,217 posts

244 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2012
quotequote all
jbi said:
yup... it seems to borrow from both f-22 and f-35 designs... but also is radically different in other areas.

The nose is similar to the F-22
The engine intakes are lifted straight from the F-35
They look like the F-35 intakes, but the F-35 only has one engine uses the internal serpentine shape of the duct to hide the fan. How are they going to do that with 2 engines? It's easy to copy, harder to understand what you're copying.........

Rotary Madness

2,285 posts

215 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2012
quotequote all
Its bloody massive for a fighter no?

jbi

Original Poster:

12,700 posts

233 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2012
quotequote all
Rotary Madness said:
Its bloody massive for a fighter no?
large fuel tanks, large internal storage space...

here is a detailed analysis from Dr Carlo Copp

http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-J-XX-Prototype.html

interestingly his conclusion states...

"Any notion that an F-35 Joint Strike Fighter or F/A-18E/F Super Hornet will be capable of competing against this Chengdu design in air combat, let alone penetrate airspace defended by this fighter, would be simply absurd. The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter and F/A-18E/F Super Hornet are both aerodynamically and kinematically quite inferior to the as presented J-XX/J-20 design, and even the shape based VLO capability in the J-XX/J-20, as presented, will effectively neutralise any sensor advantage either type might possess against earlier Russian and Chinese fighter designs."

Mave

8,217 posts

244 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2012
quotequote all
Kopp is fairly well known for being a bit of an F-35 basher; I'd take this paper with a pinch of salt. Why bother doing all aspect RCS testing when you can ask Kopp to look at some photos and measure the angles with his protractor?

R26Chris

167 posts

184 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2012
quotequote all
Looks lke a ripoff of the yf-23 to me....

Mave

8,217 posts

244 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2012
quotequote all
What, except for the delta wing, canards, side intakes, rearwards swept fins, and lack of TVC? smile

jbi

Original Poster:

12,700 posts

233 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2012
quotequote all
he loves the Russian stuff as well from what I gather...

R26Chris

167 posts

184 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2012
quotequote all
Mave said:
What, except for the delta wing, canards, side intakes, rearwards swept fins, and lack of TVC? smile
Can't deny there are similarities ?! Apart from all that other stuff! wink



jbi

Original Poster:

12,700 posts

233 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2012
quotequote all


a nice comparison

Edited by jbi on Tuesday 23 October 23:30

PaulG40

2,381 posts

254 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2012
quotequote all
I was listening to a radio 2 programme the other day ?on the Chinese economy and how it's growth is now to the future. It was said (i'm para phrasing here) that while the Chinese are just interested in coping the west they will never increase substancibly enough to threaten the west's ideology but as soon as they start inventing and developing new out of the box cutting edge stuff the west should be worried and that then they could stand up as a formidable superpower for the next generation.

So it's interesting to see the Chinese concept but I don't think it's a match for our proper fifth generation jca.

jbi

Original Poster:

12,700 posts

233 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2012
quotequote all
PaulG40 said:
So it's interesting to see the Chinese concept but I don't think it's a match for our proper fifth generation jca.
The airframe is arguably superior than the F-35 as it is a less compromised design fundamentally.

The real battleground from here will be avionics/electronic warfare capabilities in which I believe the F-35 will, at least initially hold the edge.

Mave

8,217 posts

244 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2012
quotequote all
jbi said:
The airframe is arguably superior than the F-35 as it is a less compromised design fundamentally.
In what way?


Edited by Mave on Tuesday 23 October 23:44

R26Chris

167 posts

184 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2012
quotequote all
jbi said:
a nice comparison

Edited by jbi on Tuesday 23 October 23:30
Ah. That is completely different. Sort of similarish from the front.......And it does have 2 wings. Ahem.....getmecoat.

Mave

8,217 posts

244 months

Tuesday 23rd October 2012
quotequote all
R26Chris said:
jbi said:
a nice comparison

Edited by jbi on Tuesday 23 October 23:30
Ah. That is completely different. Sort of similarish from the front.......And it does have 2 wings. Ahem.....getmecoat.
Its got a seat for a pilot as well smile