HMS Conquerer Top Secret Mission details revealed.
HMS Conquerer Top Secret Mission details revealed.
Author
Discussion

AshVX220

Original Poster:

5,965 posts

219 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
Sounds very interesting and extremely ballsy.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/defence/960...

Shame some of those writing comments are utterly clueless about stuff, but still feel the need to post complete bks! laugh

Seight_Returns

1,640 posts

230 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
Wreford-Brown is on record that he considered his most significant achievement whilst commanding Conqueror wasn't sinking Belgrano but something secret in the Barents Sea later in 1982 - but I hadn't heard the details before.

I'd never put 2 and 2 together before as to why that might be why Conuqeror's log was "missing" for the various Belgrano enquiries.

Read "Blind Man's Bluff" for a glimpse into cold war submarine espionage.


Vieste

10,532 posts

189 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
Very good ash.

robmlufc

5,229 posts

215 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
The book is available on Amazon for a fair bit cheaper than advertised on the Telegraph smile

Uncle John

5,338 posts

220 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
Very good!!

Amazing when you find out what they have got up to. I love all that.

tenohfive

6,276 posts

211 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
Interesting article.

Red November is well worth a read for similar subject material:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Red-November-U-S--Soviet-S...

AshVX220

Original Poster:

5,965 posts

219 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
tenohfive said:
Interesting article.

Red November is well worth a read for similar subject material:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Red-November-U-S--Soviet-S...
Will do, thank you. thumbup

eharding

14,648 posts

313 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
A mate who swapped careers from submarine weapons officer to a place with a much better view of the world recounts creeping close up behind a Russian sub which was taking diabolical liberties with the UK 12 mile limit, not a huge distance from Glasgow.

They lit up the Russian boat with a weapon sonar - the sonar in the nose of a torpedo in a flooded tube - which apparently sounds like the end of the world when you're at the business end of it from short range. Monumental trouser accident on the part of the Russians, huge amount of reactor noise, cavitation, noise-makers and off they buggered.

donutsina911

1,049 posts

213 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
My old CO Sir Tim, Executive Officer of the Conqueror at the time and truly one of the greats. Nuts the size of melons, gravitas, wit, charm and ruthless. He alluded to this story once (minus the pincers) along with other arse clenching tales of playing with Russians that I really hope get published one day - his biog would be an incredible read.

Ayahuasca

27,580 posts

308 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
I was told about that by a retired USN sub captain a couple of years ago - I posted a bit about it on here although didn't divulge any details. He said that W-B had been chosen because only he was considered mad enough to agree to it.

The pincers were made from the same bronze that fishing trawlers propellers are made of, so that the Soviets when they examined the end of their cut cable would see bronze residue.

But, it was not a towed sonar array that they wanted to nab, it was something else entirely.



Edited by Ayahuasca on Friday 12th October 19:14

kiteless

12,556 posts

233 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
ISTR that Wreford-Brown is on record as stating that it "would have been viewed as extremely dreary if I hadn't carried out what I had been trained to do"?

With regard to the Belgrano.


DamienB

1,211 posts

248 months

Friday 12th October 2012
quotequote all
I doubt most of the RN sub fleet's antics in the cold war will see the light of day just because of the 30 year rule. 60 or 90 perhaps. There'll be some good tales alright.

anonymous-user

83 months

Saturday 13th October 2012
quotequote all
Ayahuasca said:
But, it was not a towed sonar array that they wanted to nab, it was something else entirely.

And??? ;-)

PaulG40

2,381 posts

254 months

Saturday 13th October 2012
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
Ayahuasca said:
But, it was not a towed sonar array that they wanted to nab, it was something else entirely.

And??? ;-)
Beadwindow!!!!!! wink

anonymous-user

83 months

Sunday 14th October 2012
quotequote all
A few things do sound a little bit odd about the story tbh!

Like, what's the point in having a submarine detection array, on which you can "sneak up on" in er, a submarine. Ok, the "shallow water bit" might help (hide in the path of the towing vessel in the background scatter, then pop up when directly under the tow-er and nab the array before it spots you etc)

What other stuff do you need to drag along behind a boat? Anything that operates at very long wavelengths (low frequencies) has to be a prime consideration, hence you can't fit the system actually on a boat because of it's physical length.

I could also imagine all sorts of things you might want to nab that might end up on a rope behind a boat! From recovered spy satellite film re-entry buckets to undersea cable tapping/recording devices etc ;-)



Kitchski

6,551 posts

260 months

Sunday 14th October 2012
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
A few things do sound a little bit odd about the story tbh!

Like, what's the point in having a submarine detection array, on which you can "sneak up on" in er, a submarine. Ok, the "shallow water bit" might help (hide in the path of the towing vessel in the background scatter, then pop up when directly under the tow-er and nab the array before it spots you etc)

What other stuff do you need to drag along behind a boat? Anything that operates at very long wavelengths (low frequencies) has to be a prime consideration, hence you can't fit the system actually on a boat because of it's physical length.

I could also imagine all sorts of things you might want to nab that might end up on a rope behind a boat! From recovered spy satellite film re-entry buckets to undersea cable tapping/recording devices etc ;-)
I've already been informed by someone in the know (like they were a nuke-submariner around this time) that this is likely a load of bks. laugh

edit: the original story, not your comments.