timing/metrics on the olymic road race
Discussion
Cos the coverage was s
t? The BBC don't do cycling and it stood out a mile. Commentary was woeful - seemed as if Hugh Porter hadn't watched a road race for five years. Camera work was poor. Director was half asleep. And no one knew what the gaps were except Rabobank via their Iphone app. As an advert to attract people to our sport in the biggest window we've perhaps ever had it was a s
t show.
t? The BBC don't do cycling and it stood out a mile. Commentary was woeful - seemed as if Hugh Porter hadn't watched a road race for five years. Camera work was poor. Director was half asleep. And no one knew what the gaps were except Rabobank via their Iphone app. As an advert to attract people to our sport in the biggest window we've perhaps ever had it was a s
t show. I'm surprised there wasn't more tracking. I would have thought that each rider could have a transponder, and they could be read by sensors stapled across the road in rubber tubes. Then there could have been live timing boards for the public and commentary team, which would also be useful to the competitors.
Probably all comes down to cost, but I wonder if was even thought about.
Probably all comes down to cost, but I wonder if was even thought about.
The timing stuff all exists and was in use. What appeared to be the problem was getting that information to the Olympic Broadcast Service. OBS are responsible for the production including all on-screen graphics. They are a monopoly organisation granted rights to film all the Olympic events since 2008 by the IOC. Some of their camerawork was extremely poor as well.
The BBC and Eurosport have no control over what appears, they can only take and re-broadcast the feed from OBS.
Now, Hugh Porter on the other hand, there's no excuse for him!
The BBC and Eurosport have no control over what appears, they can only take and re-broadcast the feed from OBS.
Now, Hugh Porter on the other hand, there's no excuse for him!
aspender said:
The timing stuff all exists and was in use. What appeared to be the problem was getting that information to the Olympic Broadcast Service. OBS are responsible for the production including all on-screen graphics. They are a monopoly organisation granted rights to film all the Olympic events since 2008 by the IOC. Some of their camerawork was extremely poor as well.
The BBC and Eurosport have no control over what appears, they can only take and re-broadcast the feed from OBS.
Now, Hugh Porter on the other hand, there's no excuse for him!
Agreed on all counts. The BBC and Eurosport have no control over what appears, they can only take and re-broadcast the feed from OBS.
Now, Hugh Porter on the other hand, there's no excuse for him!
The delay in switching cameras on the last corner onto the Mall in particular was ridiculous.
Ah, thanks for the pointer to OBS.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2012/jul/28/bbc-ol...
So; OBS is just another part of the 'lock-down' effected by the IOC to make sure that everything runs smoothly revenues are maximised back to IOC.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2012/jul/28/bbc-ol...
So; OBS is just another part of the 'lock-down' effected by the IOC to make sure that
Gassing Station | Pedal Powered | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



