Compact to replace my DSLR
Compact to replace my DSLR
Author
Discussion

HedgehogFromHell

Original Poster:

2,072 posts

208 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
As the title really, Im currently out in Afghanistan and sent my DSLR back home because of the pure amount of cleaning! I'm after a camera that will be bloody good on battery, allow depth of field adjustment amongst things and most of all, not cost the earth. Any suggestions?

GetCarter

31,239 posts

308 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
Many of us here use the Canon S95 or S100 when we don't fancy carrying all the kit. Fits in a pocket, can go fully manual and takes very fine photos. Battery life is pretty good, spare batteries are cheap.

MiseryStreak

2,929 posts

236 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
A Micro Four Thirds camera like the Olympus Pen?

http://www.olympus.co.uk/s/pen-cameras/en_GB/olymp...

HedgehogFromHell

Original Poster:

2,072 posts

208 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
I hadn't thought about the S95 to be honest! Seems quite good!

HedgehogFromHell

Original Poster:

2,072 posts

208 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
Another specification i forgot to add was HD recording 720p minimum. That would mean i could replace my tired HD camcorder

binliner

262 posts

250 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
Depends on budget but Canon G series cameras are a well built compact alternative to a DSLR

LongQ

13,864 posts

262 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
HedgehogFromHell said:
As the title really, Im currently out in Afghanistan and sent my DSLR back home because of the pure amount of cleaning! I'm after a camera that will be bloody good on battery, allow depth of field adjustment amongst things and most of all, not cost the earth. Any suggestions?
Assuming that cleaning implies 'dust on sensor' than anything with a removable lens system is likely to be prone to the problem I would imagine. Compact with sealled lens system less prone though not necessarily immune.

On the other hand anything with a moving zoom lens in a dusty environment may have its own problems.

Could you get away with a fixed lens non-zoom compact and still satisfy your photographic objectives?

HedgehogFromHell

Original Poster:

2,072 posts

208 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
LongQ said:
Assuming that cleaning implies 'dust on sensor' than anything with a removable lens system is likely to be prone to the problem I would imagine. Compact with sealled lens system less prone though not necessarily immune.

On the other hand anything with a moving zoom lens in a dusty environment may have its own problems.

Could you get away with a fixed lens non-zoom compact and still satisfy your photographic objectives?
Thats a fair point, i hadn't considered the fact of the zooming section of the camera. It may be possible to go for a fixed length, as long as its wide i suppose, in order to cover most scenarios.

binliner

262 posts

250 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
In that case Fuji X100 without a doubt

LongQ

13,864 posts

262 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
HedgehogFromHell said:
LongQ said:
Assuming that cleaning implies 'dust on sensor' than anything with a removable lens system is likely to be prone to the problem I would imagine. Compact with sealled lens system less prone though not necessarily immune.

On the other hand anything with a moving zoom lens in a dusty environment may have its own problems.

Could you get away with a fixed lens non-zoom compact and still satisfy your photographic objectives?
Thats a fair point, i hadn't considered the fact of the zooming section of the camera. It may be possible to go for a fixed length, as long as its wide i suppose, in order to cover most scenarios.
OK, one option would be to fit a filter adaptor over the extending lens. Makes the unit bigger of course but, with a filter fitted, would add a little dust resistance for everyday use.

Now for pocket compact the fittings are unlikely to offer protection. But for a camera like the Canon G11/G12 (used as an example since I have the setup) you can get a filter adapter tube that fits to th body and with a filter attached results in the lens mechanism operating in a relatively dust resistant container.

The device for the G11/G12 is spring loaded and so moves to accomodate the zoom lens without inducing vignetting - so that's a point of failure of course BUT less problematic than dust in the lens mechanism. Fixed by a new adapter of it won't clean up!

The Canon official units are quite expensive. Chinese alternatives were about £20 when I bought mine - +filter of course. You may also find it useful to have a filter facility. (round screw in type). The camera (G11) already has a build in ND filter, albeit a single setting.

I assume that similar products are available for other brands.

johnfm

13,751 posts

279 months

Friday 6th July 2012
quotequote all
GF1

Cheap manual focus lens and adaptor ring.


FunkyNige

9,816 posts

304 months

Monday 9th July 2012
quotequote all
HedgehogFromHell said:
Thats a fair point, i hadn't considered the fact of the zooming section of the camera. It may be possible to go for a fixed length, as long as its wide i suppose, in order to cover most scenarios.
You can get cameras that have optical zoom built into the body, for example my Fuji XP30 ( link) has a 5x zoom but no moving parts on the outside (so is advertised as dustproof). It takes rubbish photos so won't be any good to you, but a camera with a similar zoom may be worth looking at?