Sometimes, things get better with age......
Discussion
Spathodus77 said:
I think it depends a lot on the dyno. My S2 registared 185bhp at Austec, the chap there reckoned that 170 to 180bhp was normal for an S on that rolling road.
Ralph
Aye, I guess it does depend on the dyno used. Does anyone know any particularly difficult rolling roads? The one Nick used this time was Motoscope, and he seems really good, but Nick likes to try new places to get a fairer comparison.Ralph
Longers said:
Normally BHP goes down with age not up! I'm certain engine was standard when I had it but being my first tvr it felt quick regardless of BHP at the time!
It's certainly a quick little car. Nick has had a good look at the ECU and there's no obvious signs of any form of chip fitted to it.I like rolling roads would be interested in seeing the whole plot. Have the heads been skimmed? This would up the cr and gain some ponies. That said a cold day and a few extra psi can also show a few extra. Main thing is that its pulling strong so no major tuning problems nice.
I should put mine on.. Would be happy with that figure.
cheers Damian S3
I should put mine on.. Would be happy with that figure.
cheers Damian S3
Barry S1 said:
Sorry but I don't see the point the car has only done 12000 miles
in 9 years its never going to be fast by today's standers. just
drive it and enjoy it
YOU don't see the point...what, in knowing that your engine is healthy and set up properly ?in 9 years its never going to be fast by today's standers. just
drive it and enjoy it
Oh, and what 'today's standards' cars are you comparing it with ?
The heavy computer-designed lumps of tin which even with more power are still slower ?

I really do read some rubbish on here by NON-pistonheads.

I was there when the engine was dismantled and re-built...including valves reground, and there also for the last R/R session.

grahamw48 said:
YOU don't see the point...what, in knowing that your engine is healthy and set up properly ?
Oh, and what 'today's standards' cars are you comparing it with ?
The heavy computer-designed lumps of tin which even with more power are still slower ?
I really do read some rubbish on here by NON-pistonheads.
I was there when the engine was dismantled and re-built...including valves reground, and there also for the last R/R session.
Now now girls, put the handbags down!Oh, and what 'today's standards' cars are you comparing it with ?
The heavy computer-designed lumps of tin which even with more power are still slower ?

I really do read some rubbish on here by NON-pistonheads.

I was there when the engine was dismantled and re-built...including valves reground, and there also for the last R/R session.
I think BarryS1 was saying what's the point of having a nice healthy engine if you don't go out and drive it. Surely that's the whole thing about owning a TVR- driving pleasure!

Gassing Station | S Series | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





That's just not on ! It's nothing to yolk about.
Okay o'm-letting this one go this time but enough of this horseplay. This isn't eggsactly what the forum's all about is it. 