Vc-10 refueling Typhoon over Malvern
Vc-10 refueling Typhoon over Malvern
Author
Discussion

clarkey

Original Poster:

1,426 posts

313 months

Sunday 25th March 2012
quotequote all
I watched a vc-10 refueling a typhoon heading south east over Malvern today. I've never seen refueling over land before, and very rarely see fast jets at weekends. Does anyone know what was going on? Another olympics exercise?

fatboy69

9,424 posts

216 months

Sunday 25th March 2012
quotequote all
That would explain the other thread where it was thought the Vulcan was in the air. Any photo's?

clarkey

Original Poster:

1,426 posts

313 months

Sunday 25th March 2012
quotequote all
Found a photo here: http://www.fightercontrol.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.ph...

Must be a pretty unusual thing to do?

XG332

3,927 posts

217 months

Sunday 25th March 2012
quotequote all
Whilst doing my dofe a few years ago I watched about 10 tornados IIRC taking it in turn to refuel.

GT3ZZZ

1,007 posts

199 months

Sunday 25th March 2012
quotequote all
In case you cant see it on FC:


fatboy69

9,424 posts

216 months

Sunday 25th March 2012
quotequote all
Joined FighterControl earlier so saw the photo. It's a great photo.

Yertis

19,707 posts

295 months

Sunday 25th March 2012
quotequote all
Isn't the VC-10 beautiful? Just as beautiful as Concorde IMO, and faster than just about any contemporary airliner you care to mention. Rather than worrying about whether Concorde could ever fly again, or fiddling around with the Vulcan, one of these should be restored to its original B•O•A•C magnificence, then we could all have a go in it.


IroningMan

10,598 posts

275 months

Sunday 25th March 2012
quotequote all
Can you put a window in the tail so we can all see out?

Ultuous

2,291 posts

220 months

Sunday 25th March 2012
quotequote all
Yertis said:
Isn't the VC-10 beautiful?
yes An absolute work of art - it will be a sad day when they're finally retired!

kiteless

12,556 posts

233 months

Sunday 25th March 2012
quotequote all
Yertis said:
Isn't the VC-10 beautiful? Just as beautiful as Concorde IMO, and faster than just about any contemporary airliner you care to mention. Rather than worrying about whether Concorde could ever fly again, or fiddling around with the Vulcan, one of these should be restored to its original B•O•A•C magnificence, then we could all have a go in it.
Couldn't agree more.



PaulG40

2,381 posts

254 months

Sunday 25th March 2012
quotequote all
Sitting backwards is the way forward wink I prefer these to the Tristars although would like to do a trail on the voyager FSTA once it comes into service. smile

perdu

4,885 posts

228 months

Sunday 25th March 2012
quotequote all
I used to tell my lad that the VC10 tailplane is exactly the same size as the Hunter's mainplanes smile

And to this day I'm still not sure I'm wrong to laugh at his youthful gullibility, because the shape and size look pretty close to each other.

And definitely pretty, oh yes yes

One of our (Britain's) finest aircraft

hornetrider

63,161 posts

234 months

Sunday 25th March 2012
quotequote all
That is an awesome picture

Brigand

2,547 posts

198 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
Strange how they're doing it over land though, normally they do the AAR training over the North Sea.

I'd have thought that either that's the area they'll be refueling in during the Olympic patrols, or the Typhoon needed a quick top up!

Brigand

2,547 posts

198 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
Ultuous said:
yes An absolute work of art - it will be a sad day when they're finally retired!
Lovely looking plane, but horrendously noisy! Even after 20 years of living at Brize, the noise would irritate me sometimes, although mainly it blended into the background.

It was 'interesting' living in the Block near the runway though, the windows would rattle when they took off!

jonny142

1,804 posts

254 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
Brigand said:
Strange how they're doing it over land though, normally they do the AAR training over the North Sea
Here's Air to Air ,AWACS and low level maps

http://www.aeroresource.co.uk/aviationmaps/

GT3ZZZ

1,007 posts

199 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
The Typhoon was a QRA - Quick Reaction Aircraft scrambled from Coningsby to intercept a plane that wasn't responding to any comms. The VC10 was scrambled to top him up.

Simpo Two

92,660 posts

294 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
GT3ZZZ said:
The Typhoon was a QRA - Quick Reaction Aircraft scrambled from Coningsby to intercept a plane that wasn't responding to any comms. The VC10 was scrambled to top him up.
Presumably the top-up was after the interception... would it not have been easier, if he could not regain his home base, to divert somewhere closer, refuel on the ground and then go home?

Brigand

2,547 posts

198 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
GT3ZZZ said:
The Typhoon was a QRA - Quick Reaction Aircraft scrambled from Coningsby to intercept a plane that wasn't responding to any comms. The VC10 was scrambled to top him up.
Ahh, I know what you mean, 'Tanzer' or something isn't it? I remember it being yelled out on the tannoy at Brize quite often, and had to ask what it was about. That call meant the VC-10 had to scramble to refuel a jet who'd scrambled for the above reason.

WestYorkie

1,811 posts

224 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
GT3ZZZ said:
The Typhoon was a QRA - Quick Reaction Aircraft scrambled from Coningsby to intercept a plane that wasn't responding to any comms. The VC10 was scrambled to top him up.
Presumably the top-up was after the interception... would it not have been easier, if he could not regain his home base, to divert somewhere closer, refuel on the ground and then go home?
Maybe throw in some training for the Olympics while he's up there?