Nikon 35mm 1.8 AF-S
Author
Discussion

james_tigerwoods

Original Poster:

16,347 posts

226 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
I've finally decided that I'm getting this lens to go with my D3100 - I've been agonizing over it for about a week as I really want a Kindle too. I'll get it in Jessops for £165 in Meadowhall tomorrow (I know, I must be mad to even think about venturing near there this close to Christmas).

It will join my brilliant 18-70 and my ok 55-200 (I may get a 55-300 or 70-300 some time though).

However, should I forget this, chalk it up as a bad idea and get the Kindle?

Simpo Two

92,708 posts

294 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
You can't take photos with a Kindle, but you can read books smile


Presumably you need the faster aperture?

james_tigerwoods

Original Poster:

16,347 posts

226 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
The Kindle doesn't have a camera??? hehe

I don't need this lens, but I do want to be able to take low light photos and take 1.8/2/etc photos. Ultimately I want a decent fixed lens for family photos - I didn't get on with a 50mm fixed as it just didn't work for me as I ended up too far away from any action.

Does anyone have one?

furtive

4,503 posts

308 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
I've got one. It's a great lens which is on my camera more than it is off it these days.


Aquarium, Atlantis Dubai by furtive, on Flickr


DSC_7340 by furtive, on Flickr

james_tigerwoods

Original Poster:

16,347 posts

226 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
I do rather like that aquarium photo smile

Simpo Two

92,708 posts

294 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
I think if you want to have the classic view of a 'standard' lens (ie 50mm f1.8 on 35mm) then this is the one to have.

'Back in the day' a keen amateur would typically have 28, 50 and 135mm lenses, all pretty fast as they were primes with no AF.

AndWhyNot

2,359 posts

228 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
I know lots of Nikon DX users who have this lens and have only ever heard good things about it. Won't migrate successfully to FX though so if a D700 or better features in your upgrade plans, go for the AF-D f/2. Loses 1/3 stop but so crisp even wide open and can be had used for appx the same amount: http://www.mpbphotographic.co.uk/used-equipment/us...

Can't comment on the rationale of your choosing between Kindle & lens, marginally more chance the lens will appear at a cut price in the sales but chances of scoring either with a worthwhile discount are slim.

Simpo Two

92,708 posts

294 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
AndWhyNot said:
I know lots of Nikon DX users who have this lens and have only ever heard good things about it. Won't migrate successfully to FX though
FX cameras will auto-crop DX lenses giving a 5Mp image - so it will work, but I agree not ideal. But with respect to the OP I don't think he's hunting near FX-land just yet.

chopper602

2,333 posts

252 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
furtive said:
I've got one. It's a great lens which is on my camera more than it is off it these days.
^^^^^^
wot he said

Superb lens (and I've bought the wife a Kindle for Christmas)

james_tigerwoods

Original Poster:

16,347 posts

226 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
My reasoning for Kindle or Lens is because I have money for both (sort of) and I've been hankering after the 1.8 for ages - The AF-S is the default option as I doubt I'll be moving away from the D3100 any time soon.

What's the view on how good it is (or isn't) at low light?

AndWhyNot

2,359 posts

228 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
AndWhyNot said:
I know lots of Nikon DX users who have this lens and have only ever heard good things about it. Won't migrate successfully to FX though
FX cameras will auto-crop DX lenses giving a 5Mp image - so it will work, but I agree not ideal. But with respect to the OP I don't think he's hunting near FX-land just yet.
Did think twice about mentioning FX upgrade issues and figured better to be forewarned. Know a couple of people including one who posts in here who tried the lens in question on full frame and there were bigger issues than the auto crop.

james_tigerwoods

Original Poster:

16,347 posts

226 months

Saturday 24th December 2011
quotequote all
Got it yesterday for £169 from Jessops in store - much as it pained me to go in there and not go online smile



First impressions are great, I'm loving the lens, it's great at low light and quick too - I am finding myself preferring it to my 18-70 and I didn't expect that. I far prefer it to a 50mm prime too as it means I can be closer to the action as I didn't like the distance I needed with a 50 (minor I know, but I tried a 50 and didn't get on with it).

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Saturday 24th December 2011
quotequote all
The 35mm works ok on a FX body even without crop mode afik. Some heavy vignetting but still usable

Its a fantastic lens, slightly harsh bokeh vs some of the better primes is its only real downside.

james_tigerwoods

Original Poster:

16,347 posts

226 months

Wednesday 4th January 2012
quotequote all
I have been using this lens since I got it and I can safely say that I love it smile










ian in lancs

3,853 posts

227 months

Saturday 7th January 2012
quotequote all
I gor myself a 35mm f2D from ebay last week and can safely say its fantastic. Should have got it ages ago!