Disinterested ambulance service?
Disinterested ambulance service?
Author
Discussion

Jimbo.

Original Poster:

4,213 posts

218 months

Saturday 10th December 2011
quotequote all
At the station, about 23:00.
Loud, horrible, hollow thud echoes along the platform behind me.
Turn around and see an asian guy, in his 30s, flat on his back, motionless.
It's clear what's happened: he's fell backwards, unrestrained, straight onto his head.
He's slurring, trying to get up but falling, and most importantly/worst of all, bleeding from the crown of his head.

Onlookers are doing just that (looking), with everyone backing away muttering "he's drunk...", and I'm sure one even said "Just leave him". s. I hope they never fall, "drunk" or not. But I digress...

Restrain the bloke to stop him staggering over the edge of the platform, or falling again. I think I smell alcohol, but that could be him, me, my mate, or any rail platform on a Friday night.

I call an ambulance. After describing the injuries and the casualty, the possibility that he might be drunk (thinking back, I couldn't be sure, so stupidly let others cloud my judgement) and trying to ask him a few questions on the instruction of the operator (two questions, one slurred answer, one massively wrong: he was getting worse), two British Transport Police arrive, called by the station staff. I relay this to the operator who (and this is where my problem begins) says to me:
"OK, if he gets worse get them to call us back. Your call reference is..."

...and that's it irked Of course, the police immediately radio for an ambulance upon hearing this, but still, a guy's hit hit head HARD, he's bleeding, not "with it" and getting worse, and all they can do is give me the kind of answer I'd get from IT support at work?

Now, GRANTED, it may have been an over-reaction (was it? Head injuries are st, from first-hand experience), and yes, I may have had a couple (although I don't think I sounded so) and yes, I may've let my judgement slip re. him drinking or not, but I can't help feel a bit pissed off with the response I got.

SC7

1,882 posts

210 months

Saturday 10th December 2011
quotequote all
Although not your job to do so, you should have insisted they send someone.

If I genuinely thought someone needed an ambulance I'd probably make it sound a bit worse to try and speed up the response a bit.

Anyway, on the bright side you did the right thing and hopefully did the guy a huge favour.

mrmr96

13,736 posts

233 months

Saturday 10th December 2011
quotequote all
Hmm doesn't sound great, does it?

I guess the ambulance service get rather busy on friday nights, especially with drunk people falling over. Maybe they didn't 'get' your conveyance of how hard he hit his head?

I hope you were able to leave him with the transport police? It's a bit 'off' of the 999 operator to just ask you to watch him and call back if he gets worse! But as said, they probably have a LOT to be dealing with, and maybe there was other stuff happening elsewhere in town (big brawl etc) that the operator thought was more pressing?

Defcon5

6,465 posts

220 months

Saturday 10th December 2011
quotequote all
I would think the 999 operator felt that as the Police were there they could take charge of the situation and call an ambulance as they see fit. There is no point in them staying on the phone to you for no reason - plenty more calls to answer

Midas

16 posts

179 months

Saturday 10th December 2011
quotequote all
They had already sent you the Ambulance before the BTP had made the second call, they gave you the call reference number because you were ringing in on a mobile rather than a land line and without it it can be difficult to marry your call back to the job.

Head injuries always get a response, particularly possibly intoxicated head injuries. They didn't give you further advice because the BTP guys had turned up and they have more than enough experience of looking after injured people in and around the railway.

Jimbo.

Original Poster:

4,213 posts

218 months

Saturday 10th December 2011
quotequote all
Midas said:
They had already sent you the Ambulance before the BTP had made the second call, they gave you the call reference number because you were ringing in on a mobile rather than a land line and without it it can be difficult to marry your call back to the job.

Head injuries always get a response, particularly possibly intoxicated head injuries. They didn't give you further advice because the BTP guys had turned up and they have more than enough experience of looking after injured people in and around the railway.
OK, thanks, and indeed, thanks all. Feel a bit of a dick now for assuming they'd just left it! Hope the poor bugger's OK...

GTIR

24,741 posts

295 months

Saturday 10th December 2011
quotequote all
fking NHS wing whine. Wahhh Wahhh Wahhh.

Pickled Piper

6,452 posts

264 months

Saturday 10th December 2011
quotequote all
Well done chap. Amongst the feckless that make up large parts of our society there is still a core of people that will do the right thing.

pp

Midas

16 posts

179 months

Saturday 10th December 2011
quotequote all
Jimbo. said:
Midas said:
They had already sent you the Ambulance before the BTP had made the second call, they gave you the call reference number because you were ringing in on a mobile rather than a land line and without it it can be difficult to marry your call back to the job.

Head injuries always get a response, particularly possibly intoxicated head injuries. They didn't give you further advice because the BTP guys had turned up and they have more than enough experience of looking after injured people in and around the railway.
OK, thanks, and indeed, thanks all. Feel a bit of a dick now for assuming they'd just left it! Hope the poor bugger's OK...
No worries, from the way you describe the call it sounds like they could have exited the call better and avoided any confusion in the first place.