Alfa 147 JTD, how reliable?
Author
Discussion

CPC

Original Poster:

375 posts

223 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
I guess i know how this thread may go... but

I am considering buying a 2008 147 1.9 JTD, that i will be covering on average 700 miles a week in. Other than standard servicing would the car cope fine?

They just appear a bargin compared to the dull 2004/2005 Golf/A3 diesels that have done morethan twice the mileage for similar money?

Apache

39,731 posts

304 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
If it goes like the Giulietta who cares the thing is a little belter

V6Alfisti

3,313 posts

247 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
Strong little engines, just make sure belts are changed on time (with the water pump).

Otherwise with the 147, just have to watch out for creaky suspension bushes and good service history. Not alot to be concerned about smile

U T

47,457 posts

170 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
They are cheap for a reason. Because no one wants one. 700 miles a week in an Alfa. On the back of a tow truck maybe, but not under your own steam.

Avoid like the plague.

k15tox

1,680 posts

201 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
U T said:
They are cheap for a reason. Because no one wants one. 700 miles a week in an Alfa. On the back of a tow truck maybe, but not under your own steam.

Avoid like the plague.
Any experience of one? Or are you just jumping on the back of the bandwagon?

I'd wouldn't say any VAG product of that age is any more reliable

Chicarito

1,017 posts

171 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
k15tox said:
U T said:
They are cheap for a reason. Because no one wants one. 700 miles a week in an Alfa. On the back of a tow truck maybe, but not under your own steam.

Avoid like the plague.
Any experience of one? Or are you just jumping on the back of the bandwagon?

I'd wouldn't say any VAG product of that age is any more reliable
He's jumping on the bandwagon.

Elsewhere, he's claimed that the Kia Sportage Ecobks is the best car ever, and that the E-Type Jag was completely hopeless.

Which makes me suspect the closest he's come to driving a car is sitting in his dad's Kia making 'brum, brum' noises.

Deluded

4,968 posts

211 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
Engine wise you should be fine. The JTD engine is as robust and reliable as any German unit. It's a cracking engine.

As for the rest of the car, well I couldn't tell you as I've never owned one. They are stunning to look at though.

Someone I know had a 156 JTD. He did around 4-500 miles in a week. He sold it after a few months as it left him stranded twice. Once being a flat tyre, the other time he thought the turbo had blown but turned out a hose had split. Only other problem he had rectified was a noisy front wheel bearing.

Look at that however you like, but in my opinion, that's pretty good going for probably 7-10000 miles. on a 70k car.

alfabadass

1,852 posts

219 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
Fiat invented the common rail diesel so they know whats what and the JTD is a decent engine.

Had a 2003 147 for 18 months. Alternator and lower wishbones went but that's about it.

k15tox

1,680 posts

201 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
Chicarito said:
He's jumping on the bandwagon.

Elsewhere, he's claimed that the Kia Sportage Ecobks is the best car ever, and that the E-Type Jag was completely hopeless.

Which makes me suspect the closest he's come to driving a car is sitting in his dad's Kia making 'brum, brum' noises.
He's probably right about the fact that no one wants one and that's it.

Everybody wants a audi a3 these days esp in sline trim with DRL's

OP be different. Youl love it.

Church of Noise

1,592 posts

257 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
As others have said, keep an eye on the belts!
I have a 156 jtd and the previous owner had a new turbo at +- 80k miles, these can wear.
Just last week, I had to have the dual mass flywheel changed (at 100k miles), which is NOT cheap!

But all in, I'm very pleased with the engine.

e8_pack

1,384 posts

201 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
has this marque rid themselves of their electronics stigma and thin leather that wears quickly? might as well get those questions out the way.

Kolbenkopp

2,345 posts

171 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
Never run one myself, but from anecdotal evidence, they should not be more trouble than anything from the VAG empire. The engine should actually be more robust. Just don't expect to get much on resale if you put huge miles on it.

If I had to drive that much, I'd worry first about feeling 110% comfortable in a car I spend so much time in, and worry about the costs later. If you feel comfy in the 147, I'd say go for it. Put the purchasing price difference in a virtual maintenance fund, enjoy that you don't have to use it, be prepared to keep the car as long as it drives.

Chicarito

1,017 posts

171 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
e8_pack said:
has this marque rid themselves of their electronics stigma and thin leather that wears quickly? might as well get those questions out the way.
Never heard about 'thin leather' - that's a Japanese speciality - a 147 will have Italian Momo leather (if it has the leather option), which is right up there with the very best you'll get in a mainstream car.

Electrics.... hmmm, they're CANBUS, which can be a PITA, but does reduce the number of wires which could fail wink

Dr Doofenshmirtz

16,462 posts

220 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
Carsurvey doesn't paint a very good picture, but the reviews don't seem to go as far as 2008?
http://www.carsurvey.org/reviews/alfa_romeo/147/

Let's be honest here - Italian=unreliable. But it'll look damn good on the back of the AA truck, and you'll live for the weekend when you can get your hands dirty under the bonnet thumbup

hoof hearted

12 posts

170 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
Chicarito said:
k15tox said:
U T said:
They are cheap for a reason. Because no one wants one. 700 miles a week in an Alfa. On the back of a tow truck maybe, but not under your own steam.

Avoid like the plague.
Any experience of one? Or are you just jumping on the back of the bandwagon?

I'd wouldn't say any VAG product of that age is any more reliable
He's jumping on the bandwagon.

Elsewhere, he's claimed that the Kia Sportage Ecobks is the best car ever, and that the E-Type Jag was completely hopeless.

Which makes me suspect the closest he's come to driving a car is sitting in his dad's Kia making 'brum, brum' noises.
What an idiot.

DamienB

1,193 posts

239 months

Wednesday 9th November 2011
quotequote all
Chicarito said:
Never heard about 'thin leather' - that's a Japanese speciality - a 147 will have Italian Momo leather (if it has the leather option), which is right up there with the very best you'll get in a mainstream car.
Not really. Expect a worn out edge on the driver's seat after 50K. It'll be the least of your worries, 700 a week and you'll be changing suspension bits on a quarterly basis. Mild exaggeration. Mild.

Jamz3k

35 posts

186 months

Thursday 10th November 2011
quotequote all
I wouldn't worry about the engine, my 147 has a twinspark engine in it and its the only thing that hasn't needed fixed. The car is purely rubbish, it doesn't nothing well. no one in their right mind should buy one and they are only cheap because someone can't be bothered fixing faults every other week.


Personally though, I'd buy another one tomorrow as it puts a fooking great big smile on my face at least once a day. Still haven't worked out why though!

U T

47,457 posts

170 months

Thursday 10th November 2011
quotequote all
hoof hearted said:
Chicarito said:
k15tox said:
U T said:
They are cheap for a reason. Because no one wants one. 700 miles a week in an Alfa. On the back of a tow truck maybe, but not under your own steam.

Avoid like the plague.
Any experience of one? Or are you just jumping on the back of the bandwagon?

I'd wouldn't say any VAG product of that age is any more reliable
He's jumping on the bandwagon.

Elsewhere, he's claimed that the Kia Sportage Ecobks is the best car ever, and that the E-Type Jag was completely hopeless.

Which makes me suspect the closest he's come to driving a car is sitting in his dad's Kia making 'brum, brum' noises.
What an idiot.
I actually said Kia Sportage was a very good car, having driven the 1.7 Ecodynamic. The best car ever I said was the Lamborghini Miura. I said the E Type looked wonderful but wasn't actually very good to drive when it was launched in 3.8 Series 1 form. But hey, lets not cloud the issue with facts.

I've had various Alfas on our fleet over many years, and they've all been unreliable. Every one.

Vocal Minority

8,582 posts

172 months

Thursday 10th November 2011
quotequote all
Well I have a 99 GTV T-spark, and its good fun.

Leather is a bit ropey, but never had problems with the electrics. Only significant engine problems have been *ahem* my fault. Managed to puncture the sump in Shrewsbury (I did look at the time and I thought it was still oil tight - nope) and drove to Northampton.

You only do it once.

From my general alfa experience, that was the only time it has ever abandoned me anywhere, and in fairness I abandoned it. You may well get niggles every so often, wheel bearings and so on. The 'little job' rate is quite high.

But this is a previous generation of Alfas i guess, so may have changed with 147 deisels

U T

47,457 posts

170 months

Thursday 10th November 2011
quotequote all
Where did the Alfa 147 feature on JD power satisfaction surveys? One owner might get a good one, but a thousand owners will be very disappointed.

In my view, which is the only view I post, it is a fragile product and not a suitable car for 700 miles a week.