So what makes a car a Sports Car?
Discussion
This may have been done already - apologies if it has but I can find no reference but...
After a late night brush with the Absinth Fairy at the weekend I was trying (somewhat unsuccessfully) to define 'A Sports Car' to some imaginary person - could have been the wife!
So what are the teams views?
Does it have to be a convertible?
Does have to reach 60 in under 'xx' seconds?
Does it only have 2 seats?
Must it be red????
All views welcome.
After a late night brush with the Absinth Fairy at the weekend I was trying (somewhat unsuccessfully) to define 'A Sports Car' to some imaginary person - could have been the wife!
So what are the teams views?
Does it have to be a convertible?
Does have to reach 60 in under 'xx' seconds?
Does it only have 2 seats?
Must it be red????
All views welcome.
According to Dictionary.com:
or
Matt.
quote:
An automobile equipped for racing, especially an aerodynamically shaped one-passenger or two-passenger vehicle having a low center of gravity and steering and suspension designed for precise control at high speeds.
or
quote:
a small low car with a high-powered engine; usually seats two persons
Matt.
quote:
Interesting. Just what is it that separates Hairdresser from Sports, and Sports from Poseur.
I've asked this question a thousand times. I think "Hairdresser" is defined as looking the part but not going well. I think CAR caught it quite nicely as "an astounding disparity of mouth and trousers..."
Sports vs GT is always difficult. Is a 996 a "sports" car or is it a GT? Hmmmmn.
To me: (And I know its subjective).
A sports car should:
1) Go as well as it looks.
2) Out perform *most* other cars on the road and *all* "ordinary" cars
3) Out handle *most* other cars on the road and *all* "ordinary" cars
4) Should sound great (not necessarily loud - but that's good too!)
I think its relatively harder to make a big, heavy car "sporty" (as above) so its likely (but not certain) that the car will be small - and therefore likely that it will have only two seats.
Of course the above applies largely to European "sports" ethics and is IMHO etc
Easy answer, usable by everyone:
MY car is a sports car. Everything else is either:
- too small => just a kit/weekend car
- too big/heavy => sports saloon/Grand Tourer
- underpowered => woose's car
- overpowered => supercar, just for the rich (and uninsurable!)
- unreliable => weekend car only
- too reliable => not for enthusiasts
- doesn't handle => boulevard cruiser
- perfect handling => not a real man's car
- has a roof => not for real men OR enthusiasts
(and my personal favourite)
- convertible => hairdresser's car
(but I never understood the logic in that one )
MY car is a sports car. Everything else is either:
- too small => just a kit/weekend car
- too big/heavy => sports saloon/Grand Tourer
- underpowered => woose's car
- overpowered => supercar, just for the rich (and uninsurable!)
- unreliable => weekend car only
- too reliable => not for enthusiasts
- doesn't handle => boulevard cruiser
- perfect handling => not a real man's car
- has a roof => not for real men OR enthusiasts
(and my personal favourite)
- convertible => hairdresser's car
(but I never understood the logic in that one )
Hi guys,
I have often argued this with friends and have come up with a car designed to be fun to drive as opposed to a family car/hatchback etc that has been modified to make it fast. In this way an MX5 is a sportscar and a civic type r isn't. It isn't really anything about speed as I can't see anyone argueing that an M5 is a sportscar 'cos it's so fast and an MGB isn't 'cos it's so slow.
Nothing to do with roof or number of seats (although I have never heard of a sportscar with more sets than wheels). The big GT cars (eg Vanquish, 550) are still sportscars for the above reasons. What do you think of that for an answer?
John
I have often argued this with friends and have come up with a car designed to be fun to drive as opposed to a family car/hatchback etc that has been modified to make it fast. In this way an MX5 is a sportscar and a civic type r isn't. It isn't really anything about speed as I can't see anyone argueing that an M5 is a sportscar 'cos it's so fast and an MGB isn't 'cos it's so slow.
Nothing to do with roof or number of seats (although I have never heard of a sportscar with more sets than wheels). The big GT cars (eg Vanquish, 550) are still sportscars for the above reasons. What do you think of that for an answer?
John
quote:
To me: (And I know its subjective).
A sports car should:
1) Go as well as it looks.
2) Out perform *most* other cars on the road and *all* "ordinary" cars
3) Out handle *most* other cars on the road and *all* "ordinary" cars
I disagree with most of those because it rules out (most) classics. IMHO an old MG can still be sporty DESPITE being outrun by average repmobiles. Sports car don't lose their status just because technology has moved on.
Gassing Station | General Gassing [Archive] | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff