PC sacked for 999 calls failures
PC sacked for 999 calls failures
Author
Discussion

paddyhasneeds

Original Poster:

68,222 posts

241 months

Tuesday 25th October 2011
quotequote all
I simply can't work out what the hell this is all about..

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-154484...

Hudson

1,857 posts

218 months

Tuesday 25th October 2011
quotequote all
" including rapes, domestic abuse and assaults.

However, it claimed nobody had been put at risk because of the failings"


Erm, what? Am i reading that correctly?

scotal

8,751 posts

310 months

Tuesday 25th October 2011
quotequote all
Hudson said:
" including rapes, domestic abuse and assaults.

However, it claimed nobody had been put at risk because of the failings"


Erm, what? Am i reading that correctly?
Simple..... they'd already been raped, abused or assaulted by the time they called, the fac tthat they weren't dealt with properly meant they were in no greater risk than they were already in.
(No it doesn't make a lot of sense, but I bet thats kinda-sorta hows its justified.)

chris_w

2,571 posts

290 months

Tuesday 25th October 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
And would he bother phoning 999 if someone came to 'have a word' about his actions...

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

235 months

Tuesday 25th October 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I'm not the only one noticing the lack of name and tendency to ignore what appears to be female complaints

EDLT

15,421 posts

237 months

Tuesday 25th October 2011
quotequote all
scotal said:
Hudson said:
" including rapes, domestic abuse and assaults.

However, it claimed nobody had been put at risk because of the failings"


Erm, what? Am i reading that correctly?
Simple..... they'd already been raped, abused or assaulted by the time they called, the fac tthat they weren't dealt with properly meant they were in no greater risk than they were already in.
(No it doesn't make a lot of sense, but I bet thats kinda-sorta hows its justified.)
They were unable to contact four of them, maybe they are dead?

obob

4,193 posts

225 months

Tuesday 25th October 2011
quotequote all
EDLT said:
scotal said:
Hudson said:
" including rapes, domestic abuse and assaults.

However, it claimed nobody had been put at risk because of the failings"


Erm, what? Am i reading that correctly?
Simple..... they'd already been raped, abused or assaulted by the time they called, the fac tthat they weren't dealt with properly meant they were in no greater risk than they were already in.
(No it doesn't make a lot of sense, but I bet thats kinda-sorta hows its justified.)
They were unable to contact four of them, maybe they are

dead?


:lol:

Jasandjules

72,662 posts

260 months

Tuesday 25th October 2011
quotequote all
Hmm, I think WTF is the only suitable thing I can say....