Why do people say "off" referring to quantity?
Discussion
Err...it's "of", not off.
As in "3 of part x"
It's a relatively common way to read out an order list as the supplier will be looking up the inventory first (whether by name or SKU/number). So it makes sense for the quantity to follow, rather than precede.
"Part X. Number 123456. 2 of.
Part Y. Number 490559. 6 of."
As in "3 of part x"
It's a relatively common way to read out an order list as the supplier will be looking up the inventory first (whether by name or SKU/number). So it makes sense for the quantity to follow, rather than precede.
"Part X. Number 123456. 2 of.
Part Y. Number 490559. 6 of."
ChandlerBing said:
Famous Graham said:
Err...it's of.
As in "3 of part x"
It's a relatively common way to read out an order list
"Part X. Number 123456. 2 of.
Part Y. Number 490559. 6 of."
He did hand it over to the grammar police As in "3 of part x"
It's a relatively common way to read out an order list
"Part X. Number 123456. 2 of.
Part Y. Number 490559. 6 of."

I am now of/off to the pub.
You decide

750turbo said:
ChandlerBing said:
Famous Graham said:
Err...it's of.
As in "3 of part x"
It's a relatively common way to read out an order list
"Part X. Number 123456. 2 of.
Part Y. Number 490559. 6 of."
He did hand it over to the grammar police As in "3 of part x"
It's a relatively common way to read out an order list
"Part X. Number 123456. 2 of.
Part Y. Number 490559. 6 of."

I am now of/off to the pub.
You decide

<awaits abuse

i thought it was 'of', as would make sense when i was a young, keen new worker in one of my first jobs. I said as much out of confusion
I was corrected rather forthrightly by an old, died int he wool engineering dinosaur type (who if i remember rightly threatened to feed me into a lathe when I asked him if he was sure)
It is, industry wide, '3 off' It makes no sense. I've never seen 'of' used, and never been brave enough to challange, or use it since!
I was corrected rather forthrightly by an old, died int he wool engineering dinosaur type (who if i remember rightly threatened to feed me into a lathe when I asked him if he was sure)
It is, industry wide, '3 off' It makes no sense. I've never seen 'of' used, and never been brave enough to challange, or use it since!
In UK manufacturing, particularly if it is defence orientated, it is 'off' not 'of'.
A theory is that it comes from the stores taking a number off their stock, but it could be an abbreviation for Material Take Off or Quantity Take Off, but wherever it comes from, it's definitely 'off'.
A theory is that it comes from the stores taking a number off their stock, but it could be an abbreviation for Material Take Off or Quantity Take Off, but wherever it comes from, it's definitely 'off'.
Pioneer said:
Famous Graham said:
Err...it's "of", not off.
As in "3 of part x"
It's a relatively common way to read out an order list as the supplier will be looking up the inventory first (whether by name or SKU/number). So it makes sense for the quantity to follow, rather than precede.
"Part X. Number 123456. 2 of.
Part Y. Number 490559. 6 of."
Yeah but as the OP says a lot of people say 'off', I think it should be 'of'As in "3 of part x"
It's a relatively common way to read out an order list as the supplier will be looking up the inventory first (whether by name or SKU/number). So it makes sense for the quantity to follow, rather than precede.
"Part X. Number 123456. 2 of.
Part Y. Number 490559. 6 of."
(I find it difficult, I want to use "of" instead)
scdan4 said:
i thought it was 'of', as would make sense when i was a young, keen new worker in one of my first jobs. I said as much out of confusion
I was corrected rather forthrightly by an old, died int he wool engineering dinosaur type (who if i remember rightly threatened to feed me into a lathe when I asked him if he was sure)
It is, industry wide, '3 off' It makes no sense. I've never seen 'of' used, and never been brave enough to challange, or use it since!
1 off makes sense in manufacturing, as in a '1 off' rather than '1 of', meaning bespoke. Beyond that, no idea.I was corrected rather forthrightly by an old, died int he wool engineering dinosaur type (who if i remember rightly threatened to feed me into a lathe when I asked him if he was sure)
It is, industry wide, '3 off' It makes no sense. I've never seen 'of' used, and never been brave enough to challange, or use it since!
The technique of measuring quantities from drawings, sketches and specifications prepared by designers, principally architects and engineers, in order to prepare tender/contract documents, is known in the industry as taking off. The quantities of work taken off typically are used to prepare bills of quantities (BoQ), which usually are prepared in accordance with a published Standard Method of Measurement(SMM) as agreed to by the QS profession and representatives of the construction industry.
Source: Wikipedia
Source: Wikipedia
Famous Graham said:
Err...it's "of", not off.
As in "3 of part x"
It's a relatively common way to read out an order list as the supplier will be looking up the inventory first (whether by name or SKU/number). So it makes sense for the quantity to follow, rather than precede.
"Part X. Number 123456. 2 of.
Part Y. Number 490559. 6 of."
It's "off". Some discussion here:As in "3 of part x"
It's a relatively common way to read out an order list as the supplier will be looking up the inventory first (whether by name or SKU/number). So it makes sense for the quantity to follow, rather than precede.
"Part X. Number 123456. 2 of.
Part Y. Number 490559. 6 of."
http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=179067
I was taught that it refers to stores / stock control - 2 off the total number on the shelf.
Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff