8-turbo Chevy engine anyone?

8-turbo Chevy engine anyone?

Author
Discussion

gt5s_1985

Original Poster:

703 posts

263 months

Monday 7th June 2004
quotequote all
Any comments on this 1957 Chevy with an octo-turbo setup?? He's probably the only one on his block with one..

www.lateral-g.net/sandlin/

Boosted LS1

21,198 posts

267 months

Monday 7th June 2004
quotequote all
I think it's horrible and a really poor way to go about it. He must have a source of cheap turbo's though

phil hill

433 posts

283 months

Monday 7th June 2004
quotequote all
Yeah, ok, so it's a bit ott, but check out the engineering and workmanship!! And check out the links to the other projects, like that superb MK1 Mustang..........

This is exactly why the US custom car and bike scene has the european 'pox power' stuff licked. I mean they have their 'rice racers' too, and the low-rider thing which I can't quite understand myself, but they also have this sort of thing going on. There is still a popular 'home build' custom culture as well as these high-dollar projects, and the local and mail-order speed shops provide all the bits you need. I realise that this sort of project isn't going to be cheap, even if the relative cost is lower in the US.

If you ever get to see the US version of Monster Garage you will see why the UK version is so naff, and if Orange County Choppers is coming to Sky you will see what a proper custom chopper is all about.

I only wish we could get that kind of attention to detail, quality and committment to a project here.......

gt5s_1985

Original Poster:

703 posts

263 months

Monday 7th June 2004
quotequote all
Boosted LS1 said:
I think it's horrible and a really poor way to go about it. He must have a source of cheap turbo's though


Is it perhaps the most effecient layout? Probably not. To me it is sort of like that project of building a jet engine in your shed to cool your beer - not the most rational way to make power but makes for a nice project and has a certain amount of "wow" factor. Just getting the thing to run properly must be a challenge in itself!

gtrclive

4,187 posts

290 months

Monday 7th June 2004
quotequote all
What only 8 !!!!!! I'm sure there must be a V12 out there some where....

EddyB

172 posts

246 months

Monday 14th June 2004
quotequote all
Crikey.

deltaf

6,806 posts

260 months

Monday 14th June 2004
quotequote all
Great engineering and superbly put together but what a dumb idea.....

Could have got at least the same kind of outputs from a twin turbo setup.....

Pigeon

18,535 posts

253 months

Tuesday 15th June 2004
quotequote all
Yes, but doing that wouldn't be so much FUN...

(and you probably get less lag too)

Apache

39,731 posts

291 months

Tuesday 15th June 2004
quotequote all
deltaf said:
Great engineering and superbly put together but what a dumb idea.....

Could have got at least the same kind of outputs from a twin turbo setup.....


what about lag, surely these little feckers'd be on the case straight away

Mikey G

4,782 posts

247 months

Tuesday 15th June 2004
quotequote all
Apache said:


what about lag, surely these little feckers'd be on the case straight away


Not neccesarily, 1 exhaust port to 1 turbo as opposed to 4 ports and one turbo. try blowing your desktop fan around in a panting motion instead of a constant stream of air should give you an idea as to what i'm on about

Boosted Ls1

21,198 posts

267 months

Tuesday 15th June 2004
quotequote all
It's usually a good idea to have a short manifold and then the turbo. That way you get high exhaust pressure. His turbos are so far away from the head there will be a pressure drop. It's a dumb idea. I thought of 4 turbo's mounted at the heads on 4 custom twin manifolds but decided that was a dumb idea and ditched it

Buffalo

5,457 posts

261 months

Tuesday 15th June 2004
quotequote all
Boosted Ls1 said:
It's usually a good idea to have a short manifold and then the turbo. That way you get high exhaust pressure. His turbos are so far away from the head there will be a pressure drop. It's a dumb idea. I thought of 4 turbo's mounted at the heads on 4 custom twin manifolds but decided that was a dumb idea and ditched it


You were probably going for max power or something similar. I would imagine his reasons for doing so were entirely different!

Apache

39,731 posts

291 months

Tuesday 15th June 2004
quotequote all
Mikey G said:

Apache said:


what about lag, surely these little feckers'd be on the case straight away



Not neccesarily, 1 exhaust port to 1 turbo as opposed to 4 ports and one turbo. try blowing your desktop fan around in a panting motion instead of a constant stream of air should give you an idea as to what i'm on about



nice analogy!

Boosted Ls1

21,198 posts

267 months

Tuesday 15th June 2004
quotequote all
Buffalo said:

Boosted Ls1 said:
It's usually a good idea to have a short manifold and then the turbo. That way you get high exhaust pressure. His turbos are so far away from the head there will be a pressure drop. It's a dumb idea. I thought of 4 turbo's mounted at the heads on 4 custom twin manifolds but decided that was a dumb idea and ditched it



You were probably going for max power or something similar. I would imagine his reasons for doing so were entirely different!


Quite right. I suspect he will have greater bragging rights down at the pub though

dcw@pr

3,516 posts

250 months

Wednesday 16th June 2004
quotequote all
I'm sure it's not the best way of doing it, like you have all said, but what a brilliant project.

dinkel

27,173 posts

265 months

Saturday 19th June 2004
quotequote all
This guys plant must suck so much air the car's running in a vacuum . . . Or groundeffect maybe better . . .

Why do people waste time on this kinda nuttery? I'm no engineer but surely this can't result in a proper running engine? Saw this before.
And when you really want to rock the funky beat there's this:
www.fast-autos.net/brabus/brabussv12roadster.html

dcw@pr

3,516 posts

250 months

Wednesday 23rd June 2004
quotequote all
dinkel said:
This guys plant must suck so much air the car's running in a vacuum . . . Or groundeffect maybe better . . .

Why do people waste time on this kinda nuttery? I'm no engineer but surely this can't result in a proper running engine? Saw this before.
And when you really want to rock the funky beat there's this:
www.fast-autos.net/brabus/brabussv12roadster.html


I've driven one of those on the autobahn. I'm sure it's the fastest car over 100 I will drive until I get a go in an F1...

agent006

12,058 posts

271 months

Wednesday 23rd June 2004
quotequote all
Look out for the new AMG S/SL/CL 72. Same basic engine but with well over 720BHP.

dcw@pr

3,516 posts

250 months

Thursday 24th June 2004
quotequote all
agent006 said:
Look out for the new AMG S/SL/CL 72. Same basic engine but with well over 720BHP.


73AMG isn't it?