Vortec cyclone ??
Vortec cyclone ??
Author
Discussion

gorrington

Original Poster:

55 posts

186 months

Sunday 10th July 2011
quotequote all
http://www.vorteccyclone.com/what-is-it.html

Have any of you guys seen this device ?? Promises more horses ?? From a bit of shaped pipe ??

Can't see it working myself...

Last S4

504 posts

214 months

Sunday 10th July 2011
quotequote all
If it was that easy to increase engine performance wouldnt all the car makers be creating a vortex on the intake?
I'd rather spend that money on a decent service, and I think it would have better results.

daveparry

988 posts

229 months

Sunday 10th July 2011
quotequote all
Last S4 said:
If it was that easy to increase engine performance wouldnt all the car makers be creating a vortex on the intake?
I'd rather spend that money on a decent service, and I think it would have better results.
This, but it also works for magnets around your fuel lines and of course snake oil and electric turbos! Poppycock I tells ye!

v8s4me

7,275 posts

248 months

Sunday 10th July 2011
quotequote all
It says "It creates a swirling cyclone of air within the combustion chamber,"
Sounds far fetched to me. It might well create a swirling column of air in the intake plumbing which might speed up air flow (might also slow it down?) to the AFM/plenum but as for creating a faster flow into the combustion chamber, that would be down to the design of the plenum and the inlet manifold wouldn't it? I see it's an American advert which probably puts it beyond the scope of the The Sale of Goods Act. caveat emptor.

Oldred_V8S

3,764 posts

267 months

Sunday 10th July 2011
quotequote all
v8s4me said:
I see it's an American advert
Right say no more, I bet there are loads sold in the US! They'd buy a ballon on a stick if someone convinced them it would make the car quicker!

tvrgit

8,489 posts

281 months

Sunday 10th July 2011
quotequote all
Bear in mind that the engine isn't getting air blown in (apart from Pete's!) but the air is going through under vacuum, so any vortices are going to be "straightened out" to a laminar flow pretty quickly. If vortices are good, why have so many people spent so much time porting and flow-testing cylinder heads and inlet manifolds to get the air flow as laminar as possible?

In any case, how can a vortex in the air intake survive passing over a flat throttle butterfly, into a large plenum chamber (bearing in mind that the purpose of a "plenum" is to equalise pressure (or vaccum) for more even distribution), then change direction down individual intakes, past the injectors and into the cylinders?

I can see how it might assist fuel atomisation in a carburettor venturi, but in a multipoint fuel injection system? No chance.

orange_dodo

694 posts

218 months

Sunday 10th July 2011
quotequote all
Ahhh I hate these things! furious

Turbulent flow is good for getting around sharp(ish) corners but is very draggy. Laminar flow is very low drag but is very fragile.

Ideally you would want laminar flow all the way through you induction system until the inlet valve(s) which induce a nice swirl in the flow as it enters a cylinder so the direct injection fuel can mix fully with the air. That would give the smallest losses with the most power. That is pretty much impossible though as any slight disruption to the flow, or even travelling in a pipe for too long will cause it to trip to turbulence.

You do not at any point want to introduce turbulent flow or restrict the flow in the inlet. It will increase the resistance of the induction system and reduce the amount of air getting to the cylinders and therefore the power. This thing will definitely reduce power not increase it.

This article tests various 'fuel savers'. The worst vortex generator decreased power by 10% and increased fuel consumption by 20%!

phillpot

17,510 posts

212 months

Sunday 10th July 2011
quotequote all
orange_dodo said:
the direct injection fuel can mix fully with the air.
Ah, but we haven't got direct injection ! getmecoat

orange_dodo

694 posts

218 months

Monday 11th July 2011
quotequote all
phillpot said:
Ah, but we haven't got direct injection ! getmecoat
Theoretically it is better though, didn't say our cars had it wink

The 2.9 only produces ~170bhp so they don't exactly have as much power as they could!