Lytro: Light Field Camera
Author
Discussion

spydersingh

Original Poster:

698 posts

244 months

Wednesday 22nd June 2011
quotequote all
Anybody else seen this?

http://www.lytro.com/

Deluded

4,968 posts

220 months

Wednesday 22nd June 2011
quotequote all
Quite clever if it's real and actually works, although I can't see any real benefits to it in the real world.

I am always sceptical about things like this as there is nothing but marketing rubbish on that website and a few fancy photos which could easily be recreated using photoshop and flash in a few minutes. A bit of real techical information and some images of at least a camera wouldn't go a miss.

rxtx

6,050 posts

239 months

Wednesday 22nd June 2011
quotequote all
There is a thesis for download on there but I have too much work to do to read it at the moment.

Interesting idea though, but seems more of a gimmick to me than of any use to a pro/enthusiastic amateur.

davidd

6,713 posts

313 months

Thursday 20th October 2011
quotequote all
apparently released...

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Thursday 20th October 2011
quotequote all
The full size examples are shockingly bad quality (compared to a P&S) and very low real resolution, the files it produces are 25meg or so and only workable on macs atm.

Perhaps ver2.

MartinP

1,275 posts

267 months

Friday 21st October 2011
quotequote all
Very neat bit of technology but I can't see it being anything more than a gimmick. I saw a very techie explanation on another forum saying that Heisenberg's uncertainty principle will limit the maximum resolutions possible from this technology to a level well below what would be useful to 'serious' photographers, or I guess forcing the cameras and lenses to be so big as to be impractical.

JDRoest

1,126 posts

179 months

Friday 21st October 2011
quotequote all
Can't see the point of this camera. Far from being clever it's using brute force to solve a problem - eg it's taking a photograph of every possible focusing point. Imagine this technology scaled up for professional use - eg RAW images at 20MP for instance. The files would be absolutely huge.

The other problem is that it's not actually solving any problem that hasn't been solved before. It's merely providing another way to focus an image, yet focusing technology has been around and perfected since the early 80s (and maybe late 70s depending on when the OM-30 was built - and I'm sure that's not the first camera with focus confirmation), so to solve the focusing issue in 2011, it's a little late to the party.

Sorry, but in my opinion, this camera is a gimmick.

flat-planedCrank

3,697 posts

232 months

Wednesday 29th February 2012
quotequote all

flat-planedCrank

3,697 posts

232 months

Wednesday 29th February 2012
quotequote all
....aaand another review from Wired - http://www.wired.com/reviews/2012/02/lytro-camera/...

GetCarter

31,239 posts

308 months

Thursday 1st March 2012
quotequote all
Resolution of 1080 x 1080

Foot and shot spring to mind.

K12beano

20,854 posts

304 months

Thursday 1st March 2012
quotequote all
Quite easy to dismiss something like this.

Nagging feeling that, as happens from time to time, someone will have a idea moment and suddenly the technology and something like it will suddenly have some related but unseen application which could be immense (you know, like use it to control computers for precision in keyhole surgery or for saving the planet in an oil spill when something needs capping on a seabed - or something much bigger, I don't know: I'm just a dunce without a crystal ball, but....).

Otherwise it looks like somebody trying to make a market for something fairly useless. Well tell Sony not to bother with the Walkman........that's what I'd have said biggrin