GTV - V6 or 2.0?
Author
Discussion

buster-bill

Original Poster:

20 posts

211 months

Thursday 26th June 2008
quotequote all
Hi guys,

I am new to the forum, but am considering buying a GTV.

What I would appreciate some advice on is whether to go for the V6 or if the 2.0 offers pretty much the same thrills for less money and cheaper to run?

Is the GTV like other cars where the bigger, thirstier and heavier, but undeniably more powerful engine, can overwhealm the chassis?

Does the 2.0 engine give near enough the same performance, while returning better economy (I know,- yawn) and maybe different handling in a front drive chassis where nose heaviness is key?

Let me know what you think - should I aim for MORE POWER and a better soundtrack, or go for the 80% solution and plump for a 2..0, saving a bit in the process.

Cheers

B-B

Pooh

3,692 posts

274 months

Thursday 26th June 2008
quotequote all
Go for the V6 it is in a whole different league to the twin spark, the combination of sound, smoothness, power, throttle response, and the engines desire to constantly make a head long dash for the red line is unbeatable. A properly sorted V6 GTV is a match in terms of performance and handling for many a theoretically faster and better handling car.
If you go for the twin spark you will always be wondering if you should have gone for the V6.
The V6 GTV is not a cheap car to run but as long as you are not doing huge mileages it is well worth it.

stu_the_flat

1,167 posts

239 months

Friday 27th June 2008
quotequote all
I will second a vote for the V6.

I just like the sound of it. I could not imagine over taking lorries and listing to anything else!

JR

13,995 posts

279 months

Friday 27th June 2008
quotequote all
stu_the_flat said:
I will second a vote for the V6.
Thirded. Don't let the opportunity to own an Arese V6 pass you by.

pdV6

16,442 posts

282 months

Friday 27th June 2008
quotequote all
The TS is definitely a sweet car: reasonable performance, good handling and looks to die for.

The V6 is all that and more. The advice usually given is that if you're in the market for a TS don't whatever you do test-drive a V6 as you'll be smitten!

Not cheap to run, though. The V6 doesn't have quite the same appetite for cambelts and suspension bushings that the TS does but it certainly chews through the fuel. Road tax next year for post-'01 models will be £445 as opposed to £300-odd for the TS.

jamieboy

5,921 posts

250 months

Friday 27th June 2008
quotequote all
Nothing much to add, except to agree with all the above. smile

wadgebeast

3,856 posts

232 months

Friday 27th June 2008
quotequote all
V6 is slightly heavier at the front end, so handling not quite as sweet as the TS. However, the chassis is definitely underpowered with the TS in it! If you can afford a V6 go for it! I got the TS because I was commuting 70 miles a day.

TS averages 30 mpg, insurance group 17
V6 averages 22 mpg, insurance group 20.

TS eats rear suspension bushes and cambelts. V6 drinks petrol instead.

badger_royale

428 posts

272 months

Friday 27th June 2008
quotequote all
I've not been in a TS, but so far am really pleased with my V6, goes like stink and the sound is lovely, even though its still on the standard exhaust. Economy is not brilliant, but manages an average of 25-26 mpg which doesn't seem too bad. I gather that the TS GTVs arent a lot better but not exactly sure.

Buy a good one and you won't regret it!

THE BIG DOG

638 posts

226 months

Friday 27th June 2008
quotequote all
They are both a cracking car and the TS is nothing to be sniffed. However, looking back I wish I had the V6 sooner. My 1st car was a Spider TS and was a dream. Even loved the car that much my 2nd was a Spider TS and really did have some good old times with the TS. That was until the nice man in the Alfa garage let me loose in the v6.
Even though I was so in love with the TS, all I could think about was getting a V6. It felt a more rewarding drivers car to drive over the TS. Handling is great on the TS and a lovely place to be but felt very under powered.
I can't stress enough to go and test both so you can make your own mind up unlike I did.

Good luck and take your time.


Edited by THE BIG DOG on Friday 27th June 13:11

buster-bill

Original Poster:

20 posts

211 months

Friday 27th June 2008
quotequote all
Well, unfortunately for me (or more precisely my bank balance), it would appear to be all ayes for the V6 and only buy the TS if I want to yearn for more!!

Is there an easy fix to get more from the TS motor and how unreliable are they really (seeing the comments about certain components)?

I have a classic (well a Triumph) that I am planning to get up to 100% health (or at least 90%), before selling and embarking on the italian adventure, so I wont buyfor a bit.

The "hidden" costs, such as higher tax, higher insurance and higher fuel bills may sway me to the smaller powerplant, but then again I wont be driving it that much and the V6 might just NEED to be in my garage!

pdV6

16,442 posts

282 months

Friday 27th June 2008
quotequote all
They're not unreliable at all - just need service items done on time and to schedule. Keep a very close eye on oil levels as well and you'll be ok (but still hankering after the V6).

northflux2

76 posts

236 months

Friday 27th June 2008
quotequote all
I have owned and enjoyed both. Very differing personalities.

The TS is a great car fun on B roads and great for motorway cruising.

The guys above are right it'll eat the bushes and the belts, the other point is the TS engine is more likely to self change the oil every 6k so you'll have to keep an eye on it!

The V6 is the same as above, plus quite a bit. But its less forgiving and especially in the wet it'll try and kill you, in a fun way.

Both will get through electric windows.







buster-bill

Original Poster:

20 posts

211 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
OK - I fancy the idea of a car trying to kill me! I reckon I will swallow the pain and try to go for a V6.

I would also like it to be a darker colour and with red leather, so I will keep looking.

Thanks for the help/advice/anecdotes!

jamieboy

5,921 posts

250 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
buster-bill said:
I would also like it to be a darker colour and with red leather, so I will keep looking.
Something like Meteor Grey, with the red 'style' interior (red leather seats, red dash, etc.) sounds like it would fit the bill.

A bit like this one, and I know just where you could find such a thing... biggrin

pano amo

814 posts

257 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
TS is not worth it IMO. Its not a quick car, regardless of the chasis. If you gonna buy a car like this, do it properly and buy a v6.

buster-bill

Original Poster:

20 posts

211 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
Jamieboy - looks great, but I doubt it's in my budget right now! As I said, I need to crack the Triumph, mainly so I can sell it to release funds, but maybe you were thinking of letting it go for a song???

jamieboy

5,921 posts

250 months

Monday 30th June 2008
quotequote all
buster-bill said:
...maybe you were thinking of letting it go for a song???
YHM, all being well.

Deltona

48 posts

234 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
2.0 or V6?????
It's gotta be a V6.
Mind you I ended up getting an imported 2.0 V6 Turbo!







Edited by Deltona on Wednesday 2nd July 15:01

OperationAlfa

2,014 posts

218 months

Tuesday 1st July 2008
quotequote all
The twin spark is great but there is something about an Alfa V6 cloud9

JR

13,995 posts

279 months

Wednesday 2nd July 2008
quotequote all
I wonder why the Twin Spark owners don't defend themselves more on these threads sometimes since the value of these cars must be plummeting if people follow the advice on here.

For example the cambelt Red Herring: most people who buy GTVs now only drive small mileages (up to 12,000pa) so the cambelt change is done on age. If we take Alfa workshop prices then for the V6 it's £80pa but they recommend that five years is too long (note some threads where five year old GTA cambelts have snapped) so if we take four years then that's £100pa. For the dreaded TS with it's three year interval that's also £100pa.