C63 Estate - real world mpg

C63 Estate - real world mpg

Author
Discussion

BobbyK

Original Poster:

80 posts

219 months

Tuesday 10th July 2012
quotequote all
Hi All,

Do to the sale of an M5 Touring few months ago, I have tried a C63 Estate recently and been almost won over... Also the leasing deals have now fallen in line with the saloon prices, so over 2 years might be able to get it to work. However, just wanted to find out from current owners what the actual fuel consumption is. The M5 was pretty horrific, full tank / £90 of Shell V-Power disappearing well within 200 miles on average weekly commute. I know what the official figures are but can anyone give me an example of how much £'s a C63 takes to fill and on "average" what mileage can you see from a full tank?

Cheers


V8 DUH

7 posts

166 months

Tuesday 10th July 2012
quotequote all
In the 1200 miles i have had mine it says i have averaged just over 18mpg and thats with a few long runs, not much town driving and not really ragging it around
It is around £90 to fill up with V Power if its bone dry and i have yet to get to 250 miles before i chicken out and fill up again

Phooey

12,760 posts

174 months

Tuesday 10th July 2012
quotequote all
my average over 2500 miles is 18. Don't fill it up to the brim incase it gets nicked hehe

SimNugget

580 posts

175 months

Tuesday 10th July 2012
quotequote all
Had mine almost 2 years and 17000mes.

The tank is pretty small so 200 miles per tank is about the best you will get. It is £80-£90 to fill it up but I use Tesco 99 or V-Power which is a little more.

Best I have had is 24.3mpg on a gentle motorway pootle, worst is 6.3mpg on the track. Factor in a typical motorway morning is stop-start on the M25 and 16mpg is the norm.

The trouble is, I just cannot resist putting my foot down.

Buy one and if you have to do serious miles then get a cheap Passat TDI beater.

S

PS you will be lucky to see 7000miles out of a set of rear tyres too!

BobbyK

Original Poster:

80 posts

219 months

Tuesday 10th July 2012
quotequote all
Thanks guys, sounds very similar to my previous car then. Will see what we can do with the leasing companies...

breadvan

2,034 posts

173 months

Thursday 12th July 2012
quotequote all
19.5 from mine. Not too bad considering. That's over 8,000 miles (in 4 months). Oh, and the rear tyres did last 7,000 miles but only just and only because of 1,000 miles careful running in.

Tin Hat

1,389 posts

214 months

Friday 13th July 2012
quotequote all
I have a 2012 PPP, I have generally managed 18 mpg which reflects a 50/50 town/motorway split of driving.

That is about 230 miles to a £80.00 tankfull, all calculted over approx 5,000 miles

ascayman

12,878 posts

221 months

Friday 13th July 2012
quotequote all
i keep reading that people have got 20mpg + i havent got anywhere near that.

Phooey

12,760 posts

174 months

Friday 13th July 2012
quotequote all
ascayman said:
i keep reading that people have got 20mpg + i havent got anywhere near that.
I did it on a 250 mile round trip (23/24mpg) made up of mainly motorway driving. In real world driving though.... 18

ascayman

12,878 posts

221 months

Friday 13th July 2012
quotequote all
my average over my firdt 2500 miles is around 15 i think.

Phooey

12,760 posts

174 months

Friday 13th July 2012
quotequote all
I need to try harder smile

jackwood

2,641 posts

213 months

Saturday 14th July 2012
quotequote all
I've done 50,000 miles in our C63 estate in 26 months.
The average over the entire period has been 19.8mpg
Rear tyre wear as noted is also quite heavy. You need to budget for a new set every 5-7000 miles. Fronts last about 20-22000 miles.

SimNugget

580 posts

175 months

Sunday 15th July 2012
quotequote all
50,000 miles in 2 years?

Well done!

ascayman

12,878 posts

221 months

Monday 16th July 2012
quotequote all


This is a coupe not an estate and it should be noted that most of the driving is either London or country roads.

20mpg + for me at least is a pipe dream.

BobbyK

Original Poster:

80 posts

219 months

Monday 16th July 2012
quotequote all
Took an estate out at the weekend, and loved it. It feels easier to drive than the M5, when you are just pootling about, mainly as there is no SMG gearbox to deal with. Possibly not as fun when the roads/traffic allow but close, and the noise is simply electrifying. I was naively hoping and praying that although its a 6.2, that new engine technology etc might lead to better consumption, however having had the car for a day and driven a mixture of roads totalling 90 miles it appears to drink fuel as quickly as the M5. Its not really even about the money, its really the hassle of having to refuel so often. Just waiting to hear back from a few lease companies on final quotes with 19" alloys, but keeping the car as standard. I think I'm sold, convincing my wife on another super estate might be another matter.


Deva Link

26,934 posts

250 months

Monday 16th July 2012
quotequote all
jackwood said:
I've done 50,000 miles in our C63 estate in 26 months.
The average over the entire period has been 19.8mpg
Rear tyre wear as noted is also quite heavy. You need to budget for a new set every 5-7000 miles. Fronts last about 20-22000 miles.
You must be averaging about £200/mth on tyres!

SimNugget

580 posts

175 months

Monday 16th July 2012
quotequote all
Judging by the videos he posts, I would say £300 a month!

jackwood

2,641 posts

213 months

Monday 16th July 2012
quotequote all
BobbyK said:
Took an estate out at the weekend, and loved it. It feels easier to drive than the M5, when you are just pootling about, mainly as there is no SMG gearbox to deal with. Possibly not as fun when the roads/traffic allow but close, and the noise is simply electrifying. I was naively hoping and praying that although its a 6.2, that new engine technology etc might lead to better consumption, however having had the car for a day and driven a mixture of roads totalling 90 miles it appears to drink fuel as quickly as the M5. Its not really even about the money, its really the hassle of having to refuel so often. Just waiting to hear back from a few lease companies on final quotes with 19" alloys, but keeping the car as standard. I think I'm sold, convincing my wife on another super estate might be another matter.
I'd consider sticking with the 18" wheels. They do ride a fair bit better. And are a lot easier to clean..

It works out about £150 per month in rubber for the mileage we do. Yes, some of them are sideways smile

jackwood

2,641 posts

213 months

Monday 16th July 2012
quotequote all
BobbyK said:
Took an estate out at the weekend, and loved it. It feels easier to drive than the M5, when you are just pootling about, mainly as there is no SMG gearbox to deal with. Possibly not as fun when the roads/traffic allow but close, and the noise is simply electrifying. I was naively hoping and praying that although its a 6.2, that new engine technology etc might lead to better consumption, however having had the car for a day and driven a mixture of roads totalling 90 miles it appears to drink fuel as quickly as the M5. Its not really even about the money, its really the hassle of having to refuel so often. Just waiting to hear back from a few lease companies on final quotes with 19" alloys, but keeping the car as standard. I think I'm sold, convincing my wife on another super estate might be another matter.
I'd consider sticking with the 18" wheels. They do ride a fair bit better. And are a lot easier to clean..

It works out about £150 per month in rubber for the mileage we do. Yes, some of them are sideways smile

R5YUP

1,146 posts

218 months

Thursday 19th July 2012
quotequote all
This is not good! I'm trying to talk the missus into an M5 or C63 as we speak - but as it'll be her daily drive of 30 miles in stop/start traffic the ste mpg is proving a stumbling block!

She already gives me enough st getting 22mpg in the current dog mobile!