Windows XP updates, good or bad?
Discussion
I work for a small business and I informally work their network for them.
The guys who installed the computer system (before my time here) have recommended we don't install any updates on the grounds that 'some may be dodgy'.
Sounds a bit iffy to me. Tiny IT consultancy recommending you don't do what Microsoft say is good for you...
Any input for you guys/gals?
The guys who installed the computer system (before my time here) have recommended we don't install any updates on the grounds that 'some may be dodgy'.
Sounds a bit iffy to me. Tiny IT consultancy recommending you don't do what Microsoft say is good for you...
Any input for you guys/gals?
I wouldn't set them up to be delivered automatically. It is not uncommon for patches to be released that are buggy. You can keep up to speed on what updates are available on one of the MS forums, I would then suggest applying updates probably about a week after they have been released. The only updates you should consider loading blind would be security ones, but read what they do rather than just take them with blind faith. If they secure you against attacks over WAN links and you don't have WAN links then you don't need it.
Auto Update. No hassle. I've yet to come across a dodgy MS patch on any of our pcs. All the ones i've heard about have been replaced on the update system with in the day. Having spent the best part of 2 months updating all ours to SP2 last year, it's just too much arse to be bothered with. Having said that, my nice shiney new automated SP4 deploymend bodge err i mean scrpt is all ready to roll.
I let my laptop at home update itself and haven't had any problems. However at work you really don't want every PC to be downloading every minor, irrelevant patch that MS come out with. And you do run the risk of a patch causing problems - maybe not "bugger up windows" problems, but minor things, especially with older apps. Often for security ones they've issued patches that simply disable things - not good if you actually used it in the first place.
In a small, simple environment with no IT staff I'd be inclined to let them auto-update (same with AV). Once you get beyond that, someone should be keeping an eye on MS patches, deciding what's important and sorting out applying them to PCs as needed.
In a small, simple environment with no IT staff I'd be inclined to let them auto-update (same with AV). Once you get beyond that, someone should be keeping an eye on MS patches, deciding what's important and sorting out applying them to PCs as needed.
Gassing Station | Computers, Gadgets & Stuff | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff