UK demands access to Apple users' encrypted data

UK demands access to Apple users' encrypted data

Author
Discussion

Bistros

Original Poster:

16 posts

12 months

Friday 7th February
quotequote all
Only last night I activated this feature.

This could be the thin end of the wedge with every country wanting access to every user's data stored on the cloud.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c20g288yldko

I don't possess a tinfoil hat - but I'm not entirely sure having every Country's Government having free access to the populations' files is an entirely good idea and is secure from the baddies of the world.

giveitfish

4,141 posts

226 months

Friday 7th February
quotequote all
The gov, police and security services keep asking for this and they could not be more wrong.

It’s dumb, shortsighted thinking by people who are clueless about technology.

Any kind of backdoor at all makes the whole service insecure, it’s been demonstrated time and time and time again that any kind of weakness will be discovered and exploited in very short order.

Dave Hedgehog

14,791 posts

216 months

Friday 7th February
quotequote all
giveitfish said:
The gov, police and security services keep asking for this and they could not be more wrong.

It’s dumb, shortsighted thinking by people who are clueless about technology.

Any kind of backdoor at all makes the whole service insecure, it’s been demonstrated time and time and time again that any kind of weakness will be discovered and exploited in very short order.
they dont care as long as they get to monitor everyone as well

richhead

2,119 posts

23 months

Friday 7th February
quotequote all
Bistros said:
Only last night I activated this feature.

This could be the thin end of the wedge with every country wanting access to every user's data stored on the cloud.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c20g288yldko

I don't possess a tinfoil hat - but I'm not entirely sure having every Country's Government having free access to the populations' files is an entirely good idea and is secure from the baddies of the world.
I do have a tin foil hat, and have never and will never use any cloud back up, i just dont trust it.

Baldchap

8,965 posts

104 months

Friday 7th February
quotequote all
I'm old skool enough to have had off-site W/M/Y tapes and a fire safe with the daily tapes in.

I still do largely the same with important data, albeit with faster storage these days.

bmwmike

7,675 posts

120 months

Friday 7th February
quotequote all
Dave Hedgehog said:
they dont care as long as they get to monitor everyone as well
It'll never happen. It's so ridiculously blinkered that it's pointless, even if apple agreed to it, which they won't.

Evanivitch

23,411 posts

134 months

Friday 7th February
quotequote all
giveitfish said:
The gov, police and security services keep asking for this and they could not be more wrong.

It’s dumb, shortsighted thinking by people who are clueless about technology.

Any kind of backdoor at all makes the whole service insecure, it’s been demonstrated time and time and time again that any kind of weakness will be discovered and exploited in very short order.
Theresa May spent her entire time in government persuing these backdoors into encrypted data and communication. It's such an incredibly stupid idea and yet advisors didn't seem to tell her.

It's not like government depends on AES256...

Bistros

Original Poster:

16 posts

12 months

Saturday 8th February
quotequote all
nuyorican said:
Why are there two threads running on this?
There were no threads when I made the original post.

I’m happy for mine to be merged with another.

Monsterlime

1,306 posts

178 months

Saturday 8th February
quotequote all
I am happy for them to give it out, as long as I can get Keir Starmer's banking details in return (and maybe a few other bits of important information).

I wouldn't do anything nefarious with it, promise. Trust me, bro. /s

camel_landy

5,181 posts

195 months

Saturday 8th February
quotequote all
The joys of dealing with politicians, ignorant of how technology (or even mathematics) works.

Simply by passing legislation, they think the laws of maths & physics will do their bidding. <sigh>

M

eein

1,440 posts

277 months

Saturday 8th February
quotequote all
Bistros said:
This could be the thin end of the wedge with every country wanting access to every user's data stored on the cloud.
They already do. All countries have been asking for access to all providers for 20 years.

Bistros said:
I don't possess a tinfoil hat - but I'm not entirely sure having every Country's Government having free access to the populations' files is an entirely good idea and is secure from the baddies of the world.
The UK are not asking for free access, it's only for specific users and according to all sorts of processes and approvals. The same as they have to do for access to all sorts of other data and things like property.

It's all just the latest step in the age old debate of privacy versus security. I find it fascinating the balance of trust people have in their own governments versus big tech companies - it seems that governments' biggest failure is at marketing!

Go watch the excellent movie Sneakers and take note of the year it was made!

bmwmike

7,675 posts

120 months

Saturday 8th February
quotequote all
eein said:
The UK are not asking for free access, it's only for specific users and according to all sorts of processes and approvals. The same as they have to do for access to all sorts of other data and things like property.

It's all just the latest step in the age old debate of privacy versus security. I find it fascinating the balance of trust people have in their own governments versus big tech companies - it seems that governments' biggest failure is at marketing!

Go watch the excellent movie Sneakers and take note of the year it was made!
You're missing the point:, The mechanism that would allow this supposedly specific access would require backdoors that undermine the security of all users.

giveitfish

4,141 posts

226 months

Sunday 9th February
quotequote all
Yup, exactly this. Full end-to-end encryption means you no longer have to worry about Apple sys admins rifling through your data and more importantly protects against hackers getting it if they get inside Apples network.

These are not unlikely scenarios - anyone in the industry knows that outside hackers and malicious internal staff are constantly getting access to things they shouldn’t, it’s an ongoing and almost impossible to task to stop them.

giveitfish

4,141 posts

226 months

Sunday 9th February
quotequote all
Oddly, people are either unaware or don’t care. This thread has no traction at all. If it had been about something fundamentally irrelevant like the latest “woke” scare it would have 50 pages.

Compromised IT security will genuinely fk up your life at some point and our government seems determined to ensure we can’t stop that happening.

I guess it’s just too abstract a concept for most people to engage with? It seems remote but every month people lose the contents of their bank accounts and companies is go under due to cyber crime and the truth is hardley anyone is getting arrested for these crimes. Why make it easier for them?

Edited by giveitfish on Sunday 9th February 00:31

768

16,065 posts

108 months

Sunday 9th February
quotequote all
giveitfish said:
Oddly, people are either unaware or don’t care.
I think they're largely unaware, our media is appalling at covering this stuff, and blissfully ignorant if they do come across it. I suspect there may also be an element of Apple being seen as niche and for rich people, so they get carte blanche.

And then there's that this is just one tiny aspect to an already massively authoritarian government.

IJWS15

1,995 posts

97 months

Sunday 9th February
quotequote all
What the government is also unaware of - IF they got this access those they want to monitor would immediately stop using the platform.

grumbledoak

32,055 posts

245 months

Sunday 9th February
quotequote all
IJWS15 said:
What the government is also unaware of - IF they got this access those they want to monitor would immediately stop using the platform.
They know that.

They aren't stupid. It's not accidental. The mass surveillance is what they actually want.

Tindersticks

2,443 posts

12 months

Sunday 9th February
quotequote all
There is not a chance in hell of this happening.

Evanivitch

23,411 posts

134 months

Sunday 9th February
quotequote all
IJWS15 said:
What the government is also unaware of - IF they got this access those they want to monitor would immediately stop using the platform.
You sure?

I mean WhatsApp security concerns have been well known for years now, with even UK MOD switching to Signal. But, at least in my personal and professional experience, WhatsApp is still the default messaging app.

Lucas Ayde

3,823 posts

180 months

Sunday 9th February
quotequote all
Bistros said:
Only last night I activated this feature.

This could be the thin end of the wedge with every country wanting access to every user's data stored on the cloud.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c20g288yldko

I don't possess a tinfoil hat - but I'm not entirely sure having every Country's Government having free access to the populations' files is an entirely good idea and is secure from the baddies of the world.
Rubbish - Kier and his autocracy needs to be able to keep citizens safe and secure from wrongthink. biglaugh You are now on some list.

The UK really is showing up as one of the most draconian states in the West. I guess now that the Americans have woken up a bit and started to become a little bit more freedom-oriented and nationalistic, the crowd of corrupt politicians in Europe (including the UK) have decided to double down on their globalist agenda.