Unpaid invoice - letter before action or debt collector?

Unpaid invoice - letter before action or debt collector?

Author
Discussion

cheeky_chops

Original Poster:

1,603 posts

258 months

Tuesday 8th October
quotequote all
Got a £3k invoice outstanding for 3 months. They've had the kit thats not in dispute, there are some issues internally and the branch manager says its "out of her hands" argue

Id like to focus their mgmt and give them a last chance, my accountant says he has a decent debt recovery guy. Google shows there are some online templetes to send a final "letter before action" that seem to look good - eg here https://www.rocketlawyer.com/gb/en/business/manage...

Whats the PH advise with these issues?

Shnozz

28,008 posts

278 months

Tuesday 8th October
quotequote all
Stat demand might prove a simpler route.

https://www.gov.uk/statutory-demands

elise2000

1,555 posts

226 months

Tuesday 8th October
quotequote all
Firstly send a late payment invoice. See gov.uk for rules about this. Also say if no payment of the original invoice is received within 7 days, further action will be taken to recover the debt. Then if they don’t pay, small claims court

theboss

7,122 posts

226 months

Tuesday 8th October
quotequote all
I would go with a pre-claim letter personally, detailing the debt and making a formal demand for immediate payment along with a deadline, and explaining the consequences of them not doing so which may include you adding interest and either issuing a statutory demand or raising proceedings.

Simpo Two

87,066 posts

272 months

Tuesday 8th October
quotequote all
Shnozz said:
Stat demand might prove a simpler route.

https://www.gov.uk/statutory-demands
Question - I've heard that statutory demands an be very effective. If so, why does anyone bother with the court route?

Boringvolvodriver

10,074 posts

50 months

Tuesday 8th October
quotequote all
theboss said:
I would go with a pre-claim letter personally, detailing the debt and making a formal demand for immediate payment along with a deadline, and explaining the consequences of them not doing so which may include you adding interest and either issuing a statutory demand or raising proceedings.
I would concur with this approach. The OP has clearly been having dialogue with the customer and their internal issues are nothing to do with him.

The LBA will hopefully focus their mind

sunbeam alpine

7,079 posts

195 months

Tuesday 8th October
quotequote all
cheeky_chops said:
... They've had the kit thats not in dispute, there are some issues internally...
Just picking this out of your OP. Could you clarify what you mean by the bit in bold?

Sorry if I'm being a bit dense, but IMO it could be interpreted as -

1. You supplied some kit which isn't performing as expected/promised - understandable that they'd want to withhold payment.

2. You supplied some kit and your customers are trying the excuse that their internal procedures are preventing payment - no excuse and I'd go with LBA as a first move.

smile



Bluesgirl

779 posts

98 months

Tuesday 8th October
quotequote all
theboss said:
I would go with a pre-claim letter personally, detailing the debt and making a formal demand for immediate payment along with a deadline, and explaining the consequences of them not doing so which may include you adding interest and either issuing a statutory demand or raising proceedings.
I'd agree with this suggestion, especially regarding interest accruing (and potential legal costs). Sometimes it focusses the mind of the recipient if they realise that the debt is going to increase if they don't do something about it.

cheeky_chops

Original Poster:

1,603 posts

258 months

Tuesday 8th October
quotequote all
sunbeam alpine said:
cheeky_chops said:
... They've had the kit thats not in dispute, there are some issues internally...
Just picking this out of your OP. Could you clarify what you mean by the bit in bold?

Sorry if I'm being a bit dense, but IMO it could be interpreted as -

1. You supplied some kit which isn't performing as expected/promised - understandable that they'd want to withhold payment.

2. You supplied some kit and your customers are trying the excuse that their internal procedures are preventing payment - no excuse and I'd go with LBA as a first move.
No issues with kit - they ordered products from us, the request somehow got sent to their head office too so they procured some/all of the kit too. Convo then goes "can you have it back as the other supplier wont..." I initailly said no as per T+C but i thought it easier to just have kit back in saleable condition so as gesture of good will said ok and gave them 14 days to return some/all and i do a credit note. The other caveat was exact SKU product codes too as the other supplier often has old products - we dont stock these. I put this all in an email and was acknowledged by the manager.

14 days was up today so called and its still with her team member to sort

sunbeam alpine

7,079 posts

195 months

Tuesday 8th October
quotequote all
cheeky_chops said:
sunbeam alpine said:
cheeky_chops said:
... They've had the kit thats not in dispute, there are some issues internally...
Just picking this out of your OP. Could you clarify what you mean by the bit in bold?

Sorry if I'm being a bit dense, but IMO it could be interpreted as -

1. You supplied some kit which isn't performing as expected/promised - understandable that they'd want to withhold payment.

2. You supplied some kit and your customers are trying the excuse that their internal procedures are preventing payment - no excuse and I'd go with LBA as a first move.
No issues with kit - they ordered products from us, the request somehow got sent to their head office too so they procured some/all of the kit too. Convo then goes "can you have it back as the other supplier wont..." I initailly said no as per T+C but i thought it easier to just have kit back in saleable condition so as gesture of good will said ok and gave them 14 days to return some/all and i do a credit note. The other caveat was exact SKU product codes too as the other supplier often has old products - we dont stock these. I put this all in an email and was acknowledged by the manager.

14 days was up today so called and its still with her team member to sort
Ah, sorry, I'd be pushing to get paid then. Apologies for the confusion! smile

trevalvole

1,270 posts

40 months

Tuesday 8th October
quotequote all
Might be some useful pointers in this recent thread: https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...

BlackTails

836 posts

62 months

Tuesday 8th October
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Shnozz said:
Stat demand might prove a simpler route.

https://www.gov.uk/statutory-demands
Question - I've heard that statutory demands an be very effective. If so, why does anyone bother with the court route?
Stat demands work well if there is no genuine dispute over whether the debt is owed. If there is, you can find that you go down the SD path and then get told to start again with court proceedings. And have a fat bill in Legal’s costs (yours and the other party’s) to pay.

Simpo Two

87,066 posts

272 months

Tuesday 8th October
quotequote all
BlackTails said:
Stat demands work well if there is no genuine dispute over whether the debt is owed. If there is, you can find that you go down the SD path and then get told to start again with court proceedings. And have a fat bill in Legal’s costs (yours and the other party’s) to pay.
Thanks. Though I suppose in practice all debtors will say there's a dispute even if there isn't... Who actually officiates on an SD?

Boringvolvodriver

10,074 posts

50 months

Tuesday 8th October
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
BlackTails said:
Stat demands work well if there is no genuine dispute over whether the debt is owed. If there is, you can find that you go down the SD path and then get told to start again with court proceedings. And have a fat bill in Legal’s costs (yours and the other party’s) to pay.
Thanks. Though I suppose in practice all debtors will say there's a dispute even if there isn't... Who actually officiates on an SD?
Probably the party with the deepest pockets! I have seen cases where a large company will claim a dispute safe in the knowledge that the smaller company that is owed the money won’t be able to afford the costs involved in challenging it.

BlackTails

836 posts

62 months

Tuesday 8th October
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Thanks. Though I suppose in practice all debtors will say there's a dispute even if there isn't... Who actually officiates on an SD?
Some don’t; they just ask for time to pay.

If the SD is served on an individual and the recipient applies to set it aside then either an insolvency judge or a county court district judge (depends where the debtor resides).

If one uses a SD on a company (unusual but sometimes done) then a High Court judge, who decides whether to injunct the would be creditors from presenting a winding up petition.

Basically: a proper court that knows what they are looking for and can smell bullst.

22

2,396 posts

144 months

Tuesday 8th October
quotequote all
BlackTails said:
If one uses a SD on a company (unusual but sometimes done)
A lifetime ago I worked with a local authority to move their debt collection in-house. Back then, stat demands were exclusively used against businesses (there were enough other tools for regular folk).

Here's my letter before claim... very rarely do I need the next step (although we're B2C). Obviously with invoice dates, details and terms.

As the overdue invoice remains unpaid and there have been no further communications from you, my attempts to resolve this matter amicably do not appear to have been possible. It is apparent that court action may be necessary and I write in compliance with the Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct.

From you I am claiming the outstanding invoice, plus will seek to recover additional costs should they be incurred during required processes.

I can confirm that I would be agreeable to any system of Alternative Dispute Resolution in order to avoid the need for this matter to be resolved by the courts. I would invite you to put forward any proposals in this regard.

In closing, I would draw your attention to paragraphs 15 & 16 of the Practice Direction which gives the courts the power to impose sanctions on parties if they fail to comply with the direction including failing to respond to this letter before claim.

Should I not receive payment of the overdue invoice or a response to this communication I anticipate that court action will be commenced with no further reference to you.

Yours sincerely.

Shnozz

28,008 posts

278 months

Wednesday 9th October
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
BlackTails said:
Stat demands work well if there is no genuine dispute over whether the debt is owed. If there is, you can find that you go down the SD path and then get told to start again with court proceedings. And have a fat bill in Legal’s costs (yours and the other party’s) to pay.
Thanks. Though I suppose in practice all debtors will say there's a dispute even if there isn't... Who actually officiates on an SD?
I think you’d be surprised.

On many occasions invoices aren’t paid due to lethargy or to preserve cash flow rather than any genuine dispute.

On most occasions when I serve a stat demand they go as unanswered as the original invoice. Upon threat of a winding up petitition payment usually follows thereafter.

In a professional capacity I wouldn’t tend to use them on an individual. But B2B on behalf of a client I’d always suggest this as an easy and quick avenue rather than the glacial money claim equivalent.

Stat demands really only work for tardy payers of straight forward invoices and little else, but that’s what this situation appears to be.

I’d certainly prefer it if my clients instructed me to pursue full on court proceedings every time over unpaid little debts - I’d earn far more from them for doing so. However, I like repeat clients!

Simpo Two

87,066 posts

272 months

Wednesday 9th October
quotequote all
Shnozz said:
I’d certainly prefer it if my clients instructed me to pursue full on court proceedings every time over unpaid little debts - I’d earn far more from them for doing so. However, I like repeat clients!
I'm guessing that 'Lifestyle Brand Ambassador is just a cover for 'lawyer' then hehe

My most serious non-payer involved a dispute over photography, so there was an element of subjectivity even though it was clear they were simply trying to get my work for free by making up nonsense. Small Claims > High Court worked very well, but as you say. not fast.

Edited by Simpo Two on Wednesday 9th October 10:20

Cyberprog

2,232 posts

190 months

Monday 14th October
quotequote all
22 said:
A lifetime ago I worked with a local authority to move their debt collection in-house. Back then, stat demands were exclusively used against businesses (there were enough other tools for regular folk).

Here's my letter before claim... very rarely do I need the next step (although we're B2C). Obviously with invoice dates, details and terms.

As the overdue invoice remains unpaid and there have been no further communications from you, my attempts to resolve this matter amicably do not appear to have been possible. It is apparent that court action may be necessary and I write in compliance with the Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct.

From you I am claiming the outstanding invoice, plus will seek to recover additional costs should they be incurred during required processes.

I can confirm that I would be agreeable to any system of Alternative Dispute Resolution in order to avoid the need for this matter to be resolved by the courts. I would invite you to put forward any proposals in this regard.

In closing, I would draw your attention to paragraphs 15 & 16 of the Practice Direction which gives the courts the power to impose sanctions on parties if they fail to comply with the direction including failing to respond to this letter before claim.

Should I not receive payment of the overdue invoice or a response to this communication I anticipate that court action will be commenced with no further reference to you.

Yours sincerely.
I would also bring their attention to the statutory late payment legislation, and remind them that the invoice is now subject to the fixed fee + interest accruing to date.

Hobo

5,866 posts

253 months

Monday 14th October
quotequote all
For a 3k undisputed debt I would suggest the 'Stat Demand' route. Its free to issue, and the company will have 21 days from date of its issue to apply to the court to have it set aside, ie to stop you issuing a winding up petition. It will involve a visit to the court, in front of a judge, for both parties and the judge will decide whether there is an argument to it being set aside or not. They won't consider affordability or such, its simply a legal decision on whether they deem the debt due or not. It is therefore extremely effective.

The other option as others have mentioned is small claims court. I wouldn't suggest this route for an undisputed debt as you would basically be giving the other party months and months to pay. First they get to tick a box saying they want 28 to reply. You then have to try and resolve through mediation, which is useless, and then finally you will be given a date for a hearing. Honestly, its painfully slow these days, and you have to pay for the pleasure up front.

If they have the money to pay, and the debt isn't disputed, its a no brainer to me.... (and has been recently as have issued two to a company I undertook work for recently who decided they didn't want to pay around 10k in total. Needless to say, they lost, and it was quite entertaining to see).