Court Enforcement Services
Discussion
Hi all,
We are trying to claim, via the courts (Court Enforcement Services have tried but seem to not get hold of our client), for some money which is owed.
It seems the limited company has no assets.... yet!
Once the CES have tried all methods, can we just wait for the company to get assets and then instruct them to go again.
We are sure the business will at some point have assets, as they appear to be gearing up on socials.
Anyone got any advice on where to go from here?
Thanks
We are trying to claim, via the courts (Court Enforcement Services have tried but seem to not get hold of our client), for some money which is owed.
It seems the limited company has no assets.... yet!
Once the CES have tried all methods, can we just wait for the company to get assets and then instruct them to go again.
We are sure the business will at some point have assets, as they appear to be gearing up on socials.
Anyone got any advice on where to go from here?
Thanks
nunners said:
Once the CES have tried all methods, can we just wait for the company to get assets and then instruct them to go again.
Yes. A CCJ remains in place for six years. So sit on it until they have sufficient assets and then enforce. The risk is that they liquidate the company and start again, rendering the CCJ useless. StevieBee said:
nunners said:
Once the CES have tried all methods, can we just wait for the company to get assets and then instruct them to go again.
Yes. A CCJ remains in place for six years. So sit on it until they have sufficient assets and then enforce. The risk is that they liquidate the company and start again, rendering the CCJ useless. Simpo Two said:
StevieBee said:
nunners said:
Once the CES have tried all methods, can we just wait for the company to get assets and then instruct them to go again.
Yes. A CCJ remains in place for six years. So sit on it until they have sufficient assets and then enforce. The risk is that they liquidate the company and start again, rendering the CCJ useless. If the Directors have provided personal guarantees, Ltd status won't afford them any protection although in such scenarios, the creditors will be banks. And if the Directors have acted illegally there may be some recourse to recover debts from them directly.
Other than that, a Ltd is pretty much 100% bomb-proof. Even HMRC can't pursue Directors for outstanding corporation tax.
Often, the only way to get Directors to settle debts owed by their company is via the services of 'Bermondsey Dave', often found residing at your nearest Flat-Roof pub!
Simpo Two said:
Hmm. How would the the OP know if they had provided personal guarantees?
The only time would be in the case of liquidation where such arrangements would be included within the disclosure documents. In any case, that would only relate to any borrowing they have in place or if they have a large credit limit with a supplier where a PG was required. Many moons ago, in a former life, I was sent on a debt collection course.
The most powerful tool is to apply for a winding-up petition.
Used it several times and in each case we had the money within a week.
https://www.gov.uk/protecting-company-from-compuls...
Very satisfying when a director has said to you ... "just f**ing sue us then"
The most powerful tool is to apply for a winding-up petition.
Used it several times and in each case we had the money within a week.
https://www.gov.uk/protecting-company-from-compuls...
Very satisfying when a director has said to you ... "just f**ing sue us then"
Gassing Station | Business | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff