wange wover

Wednesday 11th February 2004

Range Rover

Robert Farago tries out the luxury SUV. Avoid Abrupt Manoeuvres they say...


Range Rover Evolution is a strange thing.  You start with a single cell animal, wait a couple billion years and end up with Eminem.  By the same token, you start with a rough and ready off-roader, wait thirty-four years, and end up with a luxury car on stilts.  Evolution is not a good thing or a bad thing; it’s just a thing.  But the question remains: is the Range Rover fit enough to survive in an automotive environment teeming with first class competition?

The moment you heave yourself aboard the Range Rover, the British-built SUV asserts its exclusivity.  The RR rejects the usual luxury car sports seat posturing in favour of a driver’s throne, complete with leather arm rest.  The view through the all-but-vertical windscreen reinforces the imperious vibe.  You sit up high, master of all you survey - including about an acre of bonnet stretched out beneath you like the playing fields of Eton. 

Snob Job

Range Rover
Range Rover Sat Nav
It’s hard not to submit to the Rover’s class snobbery.  There’s so damn much of it.  From the elegantly restrained dash to the wonderfully tactile switchgear, the interior caters to your every need like a discrete, fastidious butler.  Heated seat?  Press here sir, in the centre of the climate control button. 

Satellite navigation?  We use the old BMW system.  It’s so much more intuitive than iDrive. 

Cup holder?  Allow me.  I’ll just push this little panel and… there you are.  You see, it adjusts to any size beverage. 

The Range Rover’s cabin is ergonomically perfect eye candy.  It’s no surprise that corporate parent Ford copied the style for its revised F-150 pickup truck.  Like Ford’s best-selling behemoth, the Rover’s interior offers the ultimate luxury: a super-abundance of elbow, leg and shoulder room.  The Range Rover can carry a sham of professional wrestlers, and their bulbous belts, without cramping the grapplers’ style.  

Power House

Of course an off-roader this epic requires a gi-normous engine. The Range Rover’s 32-valve, 4.4-litre V8 cranks out 282hp.  Equally impressive, the powerplant unleashes a torrent of torque: 325ft. lbs. at a leisurely 3600rpms.  Feel that?  You will when you put your foot down.  The engine bellows, the rear end squats and the Range Rover just plumb takes off.  This stately home on wheels whooshes from zero to sixty in nine seconds, cruises comfortably at the ton and responds enthusiastically to most throttle inputs without resorting to kickdown.

 

And here’s where we start to run into trouble.  Do you really want to cane a vehicle that weighs 2,439kg and stands over 6 feet tall?  To their credit, Land Rover has tried every trick in the book to make the beast handle on-road: monocoque construction, adjustable air suspension with terrain sensing software, cornering brake control, dynamic stability control, MacPherson struts with double-pivot lower arms and long-travel variable rate air springs (computer-controlled with cross-link valves) - the works.  The result?  As the visor says, “Avoid abrupt manoeuvres”.

Directional Changes

Range Rover The steering doesn’t help.  The speed-sensitive rack and pinion set-up is lighter than a wino's wallet.  While you can wheel the Rover through the urban jungle with one finger, there’s nowhere near enough steering feel to tell you when the 19" wheels (20" optional) are stressing in the twisties.  With 3.5 turns lock-to-lock, there’s also a lot of slop in the system.  It’s all too easy to over-heave the helm.  High speed driving requires a gentle hand and massive concentration.

If you’re thinking, well, that’s the price you pay for genuine off-road capability and why don’t you just slow the Hell down anyway? I’m cool with that.  But the handling issues bring us back to square one, wondering whether it’s a good idea to build a luxury car that wants to fall over in every corner.  I’m not so sure.  I’ve seen three Range Rovers on flatbeds with the front left pillar squashed down to hip level.  That’s got to hurt.

Besides, real luxury cars are all about wafting.  While the Range Rover is a veritable flying brick, it lacks the reassuring (if limited) driving dynamics of a similarly priced, equally sumptuous, spatially equivalent BMW 745iL or Audi A8L.  Carve through a corner in one of those bad boys, and the machine will gently remind you that you’re driving something titanic that prefers not to be hustled.  Do the same in a Range Rover and the wake-up call is not so gentle.  The sudden arrival of tippy-over trouble makes it difficult to drive a Range Rover in that luxury car auto-pilot psycho-bubble kinda way.

Range Rover

So where does this leave the £45k-plus Range Rover?  The trend at the top end of the SUV market is towards on-road performance.  Given Land Rover’s evolving strengths, I reckon the brand will find the fitness it needs to survive.  The next generation Range Rover is bound to be a real stormer.   

Copyright © Robert Farago 2004

www.thetruthaboutcars.com

Links


Author
Discussion

dans

Original Poster:

1,137 posts

291 months

Wednesday 11th February 2004
quotequote all
Good article - they are just a touch impractical, but also achingly good looking compared to any of their competition.

Have you been leafing through the Rough guide to Mockney prose Mr Farago?

greg_d

6,542 posts

253 months

Wednesday 11th February 2004
quotequote all
Try driving a euro spec one and you will find that it will give the aforementioned luxury cars a run for their money on road.
Robert drove the blancmange spec US version.

beermonster

45 posts

254 months

Wednesday 11th February 2004
quotequote all
Also the Range rover Vogue is standard on 19 inch wheels for both markets with an option for 20 inch all round not 19 inch front and 20 inch rear.....blooming journalists never get it right!!


robert farago

108 posts

277 months

Wednesday 11th February 2004
quotequote all
Oops! 19 and 20's? What was I [not] thinking? New baby in house. Sleep deprived. Change made. Aloha.

toppstuff

13,698 posts

254 months

Wednesday 11th February 2004
quotequote all
But of we accept that few people drive these off road - then the handling bias ( and the appaling on road stability in the event of "abrupt movements" ) makes the car a death trap, surely ??

Is not an X5 safer, faster, moe economical and a lot more honest about what it is designed for ?

Nils Baker

59 posts

271 months

Wednesday 11th February 2004
quotequote all
I have just chopped my M5 in for one and have had one of the old models, they are great cars and not as unstable as our friend makes out, yes if you go nuts you might be able to tip over but you would have to really really try. I bought mine because I hate the image of the X5 and the Rangie is just so much more comfortable and as I do use it off road there is no way an X5/ML/Volvo would cope. Maybe the septic version is a bit squashier.
Still shame it doesn't oversteer like the old Beemer but it does drift in the wet.

neon_fox

386 posts

291 months

Wednesday 11th February 2004
quotequote all
Go out to Berkshire and you'll see plent of honestly muddy RRs (sadly the same thing cannot be said of Chelsea and Kensington).

Remember that there are a lot of rich farmers out there, and the good 'ole RR is their steed of choice, and until the KN nothing else would cut the mustard.

Fox
---

Doug M

1 posts

249 months

Tuesday 24th February 2004
quotequote all
I just Flicked an X5 for a new Rangie. Here in OZ, X5s are abit like bums (everybodys got one.) Ive got to say its the best decision I've made since electing not to see "Cats." After 7000Ks on and off road I find the ride/handling compromise on road, a small price to pay for the Rangies competance overall. Mr Faragos purple prose is rather amusing but it does bring out the defensive owner in me. The Rangie is a very satisfying and involving vehicle to own. The only real criticism I have after 6 months is its deep and gorgeous thirst but hey its only marginally worse than the X5 and significantly better than the Hummer. Ok so I'm clutching at straws now.

craigw

12,248 posts

289 months

Tuesday 24th February 2004
quotequote all
I did the range rover driving course a couple of weeks ago. You would not believe what these cars can do (off road I mean)

Look out for the new disco coming next year, I hear from a source in the know that its going to be a bit special.

ColumN

61 posts

248 months

Tuesday 13th April 2004
quotequote all
I've got a RR and I don't recognise the handling issues this article complains about - are you sure the reviewer was driving the new model? Anyhow, complaining that the RR doesn't handle like a sports saloon is a bit like complaining that your mansion costs a lot to heat. You pays your money...

JSG

2,238 posts

290 months

Friday 16th April 2004
quotequote all
Simple really - a Range Rover is not a sports car so don't expect it to handle like one. The Range Rover is a match for the Beemer and Merc on road and a lot more capable off road.

Many owners do take them off road as well, including me