RE: Range Rover Sport gets body kit

RE: Range Rover Sport gets body kit

Wednesday 29th March 2006

Range Rover Sport gets body kit

Hardly off-roader sports new chin spoiler


none
none

Land Rover has -- er -- beefed up the Range Rover Sport, adding a host of additional equipment and called it the Sport HST. Its design cues were inspired by the Range Stormer concept car, first shown at the Detroit auto show in January 2004. The HST is no faster than the supercharged specification on which it's based but it does look different.

Additional equipment includes: electric sunroof, an electronic active locking rear differential and privacy glass. The interior gets hand polished, lined oak trim.

The exterior design is the work of the same Land Rover team that created the original Range Stormer. It includes new flush-fitting front and rear bumpers and a new larger open-mouth grille. The front lower air intake is deeper and new front fog lamps are mounted in the spoiler.

The lower doors and lower rear boot are body-coloured, making the body sides appear deeper, accentuating the vehicle’s road-hugging qualities. A new tail spoiler is also fitted, and the special rectangular tail-pipes are close to those used on the original Range Stormer concept vehicle.

It gets 20 inch 'Stormer' alloy wheels, chromed aluminium side vents and body-coloured door mirror cappings, unique to this derivative.

"The HST gives the Range Rover Sport an especially impressive stance, hunkered down tight to the road," said Land Rover's design director Geoff Upex. "It's the extreme version of the Range Rover Sport, the design that will be chosen by those who want to stand out from the crowd."

The HST is available in five colours; grey, blue, black, red and silver. Performance figures are the same as the standard Supercharged model.

As a Land Rover, the HST will naturally still have off-road capability – though which of its customers are likely to take it further than the edge of a slightly moist field is debateable. The removable chin spoiler means that approach and departure angles are as good as the standard vehicle, reckoned Land Rover.

"The HST allows a Range Rover Sport customer to drive the closest thing there is to the radical Range Stormer, our first ever concept vehicle and a real milestone for the company," said Land Rover's UK boss John Edwards. "The Range Rover Sport continues to be a major success for Land Rover, with strong order banks in most markets," said Edwards. "It appeals not only to those who want a dynamic 4x4 but also to customers who want comfort and refinement. That's why we call it a Sports Tourer. Customers are coming not just from competitor 4x4s but also from premium saloons. They value the extra all-round command driving and breadth of capability that only a Land Rover can offer."

The Range Rover Sport HST is now on sale from £63,000 on the road.

Author
Discussion

mk1fan

Original Poster:

10,652 posts

232 months

Wednesday 29th March 2006
quotequote all
I like the Sport. I think Land Rover were/are right in adding it to the RR range. BMW showed there was a market for sporty 4x4's, as have Porsche. Now you can have one with the right badge.

Dommo

103 posts

249 months

Wednesday 29th March 2006
quotequote all
I like that, but how long before these "removable spoilers" become "ebayable spoilers"?

Liszt

4,330 posts

277 months

Wednesday 29th March 2006
quotequote all
My 91 Classic had a removable spoiler. I removed it by sheering all the studs it was bolted to while trying to undo the nuts. You also had to remove the undertray as well. It's not removable as in the same way a spare wheel cover is.

Nice you get a rear locker. That is very useful.

Nhudson

4 posts

255 months

Wednesday 29th March 2006
quotequote all
63k thats almost M5 money, different league of vehicle appreciated although for the amount of time the HSE would spend "off road" i'd rather have a screaming v10

henrycrun

2,464 posts

247 months

Wednesday 29th March 2006
quotequote all
Talk about trying to turn an Urban Dirtbox into a silk purse...

Digga

41,341 posts

290 months

Wednesday 29th March 2006
quotequote all
Shame the original car didn't live up to the Range Stormer concept...

I think the whole thing looks a bit weak (this new kit does help) and they should never have sullied the Range Rover brand by calling this the Range Rover Sport - sound like some crappy, end of model limited edition. I thought Range Stormer sounded fantastic. This, and the lack of a split folding tailgate persuaded me not to part with my hard-earned, despite being 8th on my dealers waiting list for the 'Sport, and I swapped the old Rangie for a Discovery 3. (It is, after all, the same chaissis as the 'Sport.)

The prices had crept up since the Stormer was first announced and as has been mentioned, for £65k (which let's face it, this is far too expensive for me to use as a mud plugging, TVR towing mule) having heard the sort of noises the new V10 M5 makes (courtesy of some bloke who keeps hooning down the by-pass outside my office) I don't think the Land Rover would be my choice.

Too little too late Land Rover.

hendry

1,945 posts

289 months

Wednesday 29th March 2006
quotequote all

Perhaps more to the point, why on earth are they dressing up as the sporty model a vehicle which weight 2.8 tonnes, more than a flippin' RR Phantom for Pete's sake! Colin Chapman wouldn't have one.

They do look quite sexy, but seem to do nothing well other than look the part.

skoff

1,387 posts

241 months

Wednesday 29th March 2006
quotequote all
hmm sounds like a lot of money for an agricultural vehicle, even if it is a posh one.. Not my cup o' T

Trevparr

71 posts

236 months

Wednesday 29th March 2006
quotequote all
Looks like a van with windows and bits on it-It has to be one of the ugliest cars on the road and people pay £60 odd thousand for it-Not my Cup of Tea at all!!!-Still we've all got different tastes!!!

hunttheshunt

1,093 posts

247 months

Wednesday 29th March 2006
quotequote all
I don't mind the front, the back is awful, far too busy. I don't see the point of it either.

I thought about buying one when they first came out but the performance is just so so and it's quite tight on space inside. Decided to stick with the X5. It might be getting a little dated as a shape but it's still the best looking SUV IMHO, and with the 4.8 it goes properly too!!

That said, if I had to keep just one car, it would be my wifes Disco 3

4WD

2,289 posts

238 months

Wednesday 29th March 2006
quotequote all
I didn't realise they cost more than 40 to be honest. How could you walk past a new RS4 for that?! Plus you'd have a huge wedge in change.

hendry

1,945 posts

289 months

Wednesday 29th March 2006
quotequote all

If you are going to have one though, this is perhaps the one to have...



www.overfinch.co.uk/?node_id=1.4&article_id=28

"Max Power 500 bhp (370 Kw) @ 5750 rpm
Max Torque 525 lbs/ft (709 Nm) @ 3200 rpm
The Supersport engine package comes complete with a 3 year 60,000 mile (100,000kms) warranty from Overfinch and can be maintained by any Overfinch distributor or Land Rover dealer anywhere in the world."



Philhopkins

17,111 posts

224 months

Wednesday 29th March 2006
quotequote all
That orange is STUNNING!

andy.shent

73 posts

234 months

Wednesday 29th March 2006
quotequote all
Lined oak trim??? Imagine the splinters they would pull out of you after a prang!!! Nurse to doctor, "Have you seen the quality of these splinters"

mrmay

1 posts

224 months

Wednesday 29th March 2006
quotequote all
Well How About You Go & Buy A Normal Super Charged One Then Pop Down To Project Khan? www.projectkahnrangeroversport.com/

They Look Real Billy Whizz!

Mr May....

PhilboSE

4,754 posts

233 months

Wednesday 29th March 2006
quotequote all
mk1fan said:
I like the Sport. I think Land Rover were/are right in adding it to the RR range. BMW showed there was a market for sporty 4x4's, as have Porsche. Now you can have one with the right badge.


I thought I wanted to buy a Sport, until I sat in one. For such a huge and heavy vehicle, Deity only knows what they did with the space. It felt tiny. I'm 6'2" and my head was brushing the roof. The A pillar comes up really close to you. The console around the transmission tunnel is simply vast. Naff all rear legroom, not very big boot and very high load tray made me wonder if it was a Tardis in reverse. Plus, it didn't feel all that sporty and the fuel consumption was epic. My overriding impression was one of claustrophia - something I don't suffer from at all.

I also had a BMW and the Volvo X5 on my shortlist. I generally dislike BMW's after some poor ownership experiences of "flagship" models, and the general image that is associated with them, but I have to say that despite my desires for it to be otherwise, the X5 was, to me, massively the better vehicle. It actually felt like it had the space inside to match the size of the car, and it was much nicer to drive.

The RR Sport definitely adds something to the RR range, but it wasn't my cup of tea. Also, some of the materials inside are pretty cheap and tacky. The green LCD display in the dash is downright NASTY and reminiscent of a Toyota circa 1992.

eliot

11,727 posts

261 months

Wednesday 29th March 2006
quotequote all
Reminds me of Max Headroom:



>> Edited by eliot on Wednesday 29th March 22:15

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

262 months

Wednesday 29th March 2006
quotequote all
Philhopkins said:
That orange is STUNNING!


Get out of the way next time.....

Graham.J

5,420 posts

266 months

Thursday 30th March 2006
quotequote all
Philhopkins said:
That orange is STUNNING!
It looks brighter in real life

FestivAli

1,102 posts

245 months

Thursday 30th March 2006
quotequote all
I think the kit adds nothing - IMHO the Sport is a fantastic looking vehicle as it is - the bodykit just mucks up the lines. If you gonna be proper about it, make the concept - two door, weirdasallgetout bonnet, crushed ice rear lamps and smacking of presence - which you'd want if you were driving a vehicle that arguable falls into the 'most pointless' category.

I like the sport, but the base Disco has a better interior (not the V8 and its horrible plastic wood though) and hence would be my 'Rover of choice.

Ali.