What's the catch on this FFRR?

What's the catch on this FFRR?

Author
Discussion

shiversaint

Original Poster:

104 posts

47 months

Friday 4th June 2021
quotequote all
Looking to buy a diesel V8 Vogue SE, don't need ULEZ so contemplating some pre 2016 cars. Found this one:

https://www.rangemotor.co.uk/used-cars/land-rover-...

It's a fair bit cheaper than anything else on the market, obviously there are a few scratches on the body work shown in the pictures, same on the interior but none of them are absolutely killer and I can live with them or fix them. Is it therefore just the gold colour and lack of turbine wheels that explain the price? I don't mind it at all but would appreciate input on the impact on resale value.

KungFuPanda

4,449 posts

177 months

Friday 4th June 2021
quotequote all
I think it's priced fairly for what it is. It's a very early L405, in an undesirable colour inside and out.

Garage looks a bit fly by night though. No indication of address, no landline numbers, poor grammar in the descriptions and this is the most expensive car they're selling. The majority are £10k cars.

Carbon Sasquatch

4,922 posts

71 months

Saturday 5th June 2021
quotequote all
62 plate means it must have been one of the first to leave the factory - a fairly low mileage though.

Price wise, seems decent - most of the cheaper ones are the V6 base spec Vogues - so for a V8 SE, seems quite tempting.

CoolHands

19,421 posts

202 months

Saturday 5th June 2021
quotequote all
I know nothing about them but I like the colour and glass roof.

goddo

439 posts

139 months

Saturday 5th June 2021
quotequote all
It's just the colour that does it for me. Not a fan.
It is a Marmite car though.

bigandclever

13,940 posts

245 months

Saturday 5th June 2021
quotequote all
That mobile number is also associated with IMW Cars who have, let’s say, some colourful reviews.

Shirt587

360 posts

142 months

Sunday 6th June 2021
quotequote all
Very very early one - I have an L322 on a 62 plate which was one of the last of those.
Something worth considering is that VE/VF plates are usually Coventry area. JLR registers all their internal fleet vehicles for engineering testing etc on that plate, rather than the historic OE/OY/OW/OX management cars. So potentially you’re looking at one which JLR had as a pre-production build, but you’d only know from registration date and paperwork with the vehicle (which from the reviews, probably is non-existent). If it IS one of those, it should give you comfort that most of the obvious weak points or manufacturing defects in any new vehicle launch will have got hammered out.

popeyewhite

21,289 posts

127 months

Sunday 6th June 2021
quotequote all
shiversaint said:
obviously there are a few scratches on the body work shown in the pictures, same on the interior
Eh? Ad says "excellent bodywork/interior... ." hehe


shiversaint

Original Poster:

104 posts

47 months

Sunday 6th June 2021
quotequote all
Thanks all. The IMW cars thing is enough to put me off alone. Interesting info on the plate, thanks.

camel_landy

5,080 posts

190 months

Sunday 6th June 2021
quotequote all
Shirt587 said:
Very very early one - I have an L322 on a 62 plate which was one of the last of those.
Something worth considering is that VE/VF plates are usually Coventry area. JLR registers all their internal fleet vehicles for engineering testing etc on that plate, rather than the historic OE/OY/OW/OX management cars. So potentially you’re looking at one which JLR had as a pre-production build, but you’d only know from registration date and paperwork with the vehicle (which from the reviews, probably is non-existent). If it IS one of those, it should give you comfort that most of the obvious weak points or manufacturing defects in any new vehicle launch will have got hammered out.
You're thinking of the 'VX' prefix.

Cars for Engineering, R&D, etc... will end up in the crusher, due to the way they're registered with HMRC & type approval issues.

The OE/OY etc. aren't just limited to management cars, as it's where the lease company register the cars. FWIW - The LRE cars are supplied via the same route.

Either way, it's a very early car but one of the advantages of the early cars is they don't have Ad-Blue on the TDV8.

M

Edited by camel_landy on Sunday 6th June 23:29

Sheepshanks

34,917 posts

126 months

Monday 7th June 2021
quotequote all
The URL on Autotrader shows they listed it 17th Feb, It passed MOT 9th Feb, nearly a month late, with not a single advisory. Previous MOT had a bunch of them.

Andeh1

7,199 posts

213 months

Monday 7th June 2021
quotequote all
Shirt587 said:
Very very early one - I have an L322 on a 62 plate which was one of the last of those.
Something worth considering is that VE/VF plates are usually Coventry area. JLR registers all their internal fleet vehicles for engineering testing etc on that plate, rather than the historic OE/OY/OW/OX management cars. So potentially you’re looking at one which JLR had as a pre-production build, but you’d only know from registration date and paperwork with the vehicle (which from the reviews, probably is non-existent). If it IS one of those, it should give you comfort that most of the obvious weak points or manufacturing defects in any new vehicle launch will have got hammered out.
I'd agree with this! Been a while since my days there though...

Andeh1

7,199 posts

213 months

Monday 7th June 2021
quotequote all
camel_landy said:
Shirt587 said:
Very very early one - I have an L322 on a 62 plate which was one of the last of those.
Something worth considering is that VE/VF plates are usually Coventry area. JLR registers all their internal fleet vehicles for engineering testing etc on that plate, rather than the historic OE/OY/OW/OX management cars. So potentially you’re looking at one which JLR had as a pre-production build, but you’d only know from registration date and paperwork with the vehicle (which from the reviews, probably is non-existent). If it IS one of those, it should give you comfort that most of the obvious weak points or manufacturing defects in any new vehicle launch will have got hammered out.
You're thinking of the 'VX' prefix.

Cars for Engineering, R&D, etc... will end up in the crusher, due to the way they're registered with HMRC & type approval issues.

The OE/OY etc. aren't just limited to management cars, as it's where the lease company register the cars. FWIW - The LRE cars are supplied via the same route.

Either way, it's a very early car but one of the advantages of the early cars is they don't have Ad-Blue on the TDV8.

M

Edited by camel_landy on Sunday 6th June 23:29
IIRC not all of them, some late build can be reworked to make saleble again. Then passed on as they approved used. I would hazard a guess this is such a vehicle. This wouldn't ring any alarm bells for me, if I was in the market for one tbh.


The MOT & dealer reputation on the other hand....

camel_landy

5,080 posts

190 months

Monday 7th June 2021
quotequote all
Andeh1 said:
IIRC not all of them, some late build can be reworked to make saleble again. Then passed on as they approved used. I would hazard a guess this is such a vehicle. This wouldn't ring any alarm bells for me, if I was in the market for one tbh.
The only reworked 'late build' cars I'm aware of are essentially press launch vehicles.

In the case of the L405, it was launched Sept 2012, press launch cars were registered Sept/Oct & were on 'VX' plates. I first had my hands on a non-engineering car Oct 2012.

This car was registered Jan 2013 and at that time, almost all build slots were given over to customer cars... It's an early customer car.

M

philcray

854 posts

210 months

Thursday 10th June 2021
quotequote all
Had a look at the advert and also the reviews for "Range Motors" on Autotrader..... will let you make up your own mind if all those glowing 5*'s are genuine...

cjb44

703 posts

125 months

Tuesday 20th July 2021
quotequote all
camel_landy said:
You're thinking of the 'VX' prefix.

Cars for Engineering, R&D, etc... will end up in the crusher, due to the way they're registered with HMRC & type approval issues.

The OE/OY etc. aren't just limited to management cars, as it's where the lease company register the cars. FWIW - The LRE cars are supplied via the same route.

Either way, it's a very early car but one of the advantages of the early cars is they don't have Ad-Blue on the TDV8.

M

Edited by camel_landy on Sunday 6th June 23:29
Interesting point about ad blue on this age of Range Rover, was there a definitive date when they introduced ad blue, or did it vary with the model/engine.

camel_landy

5,080 posts

190 months

Tuesday 20th July 2021
quotequote all
cjb44 said:
Interesting point about ad blue on this age of Range Rover, was there a definitive date when they introduced ad blue, or did it vary with the model/engine.
There will be a specific chassis/VIN at which the cutover happened but I don't know what that is. I would suggest it would have been approx 18mths-2yrs into production as when the TDV8 appeared in the RRSport, it was only available with AdBlue.

M

swisstoni

18,114 posts

286 months

Friday 30th July 2021
quotequote all
I had a 2015 TDV8 that didn’t need adblue.
I didn’t think they ever did?

Anyway I would test drive the car. Any hint of wobble or clonks during low speed turning or wheel wobble at any speed could mean a dodgy transfer box.
Look for signs of oil leaks in the engine, especially near the turbos.

Mine suffered all this and a bit more besides at 30k!

So this car could be a bit of a bargain or an opportunity to spend a lot more than £25k.