Which Carb(s)

Author
Discussion

sagalout

Original Poster:

18,916 posts

289 months

Saturday 4th September 2004
quotequote all
Hi all,
Quicky, which is the best carb or carbs set up for a road going 1330.
Twin 1.25's
Twin 1.5's
HIF44 (how do I recognise one of these, I have a single carb on a standard A+ manifold but no markings).
Weber?
All advice sought.
Preference is for one that is reliable, doesn't need constant adjustment (used to old MG's in the 70's) and is available second hand in decent nick.
Thanks all

ccharlie6

773 posts

247 months

Saturday 4th September 2004
quotequote all
i think and im sure ill get corrected, but the hif44 will give you good amounts of power and also won't cause all of the trouble of trying to quick two carbs in balance. twin 1 1/4's are really for the smaller sized engines 970, 1071 etc. i guess another possibility is a weber 40dcoe. but im sure other people have thoughts on this

jeffriesmullet

134 posts

249 months

Saturday 4th September 2004
quotequote all
im gona use a weber40 or 45 on my project 1380

minimax

11,985 posts

263 months

Saturday 4th September 2004
quotequote all
a quick call to the garage who will source my engine confirms that they would recommend twin 1.5"'s

HTH

rougeleo

213 posts

245 months

Saturday 4th September 2004
quotequote all
just had them fitted on my RSP 'S' , it flew back from the ACE Cafe thursday.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

262 months

Saturday 4th September 2004
quotequote all
A single HIF44 on a decent manifold is likely to be every bit as good as twin 1 1/2" SU for a mildly tuned 1330cc engine, without the hassle of balancing them. The standard twin SU manifolds are absoluetly dire in terms of flow. You wouldn't have though it possible to make such a simple design work so badly, but they did it.

The twin SU's would be better for a "period look" though, assuming the rest of the car matches it (no 13" wheels etc!).

A 45DCOE is great for a really flying 1380, as long as you don't mind cutting a big hole in the bulkhead and being deafened by induction noise.

Fatboy

8,089 posts

279 months

Saturday 4th September 2004
quotequote all
jeffriesmullet said:
im gona use a weber40 or 45 on my project 1380

Weber's are cool - I quite fancy a 40 downdraught, so I can have the air filter poking through the bonnet, muscle car style

jeffriesmullet

134 posts

249 months

Sunday 5th September 2004
quotequote all
that would be cool aint they hard to find though

sagalout

Original Poster:

18,916 posts

289 months

Sunday 5th September 2004
quotequote all
As I don't want to cut any holes through bulkhead or bonnet (although that does look musclecar) it looks like 2 x 1.5 or HIF44.
I know thats 1.75" dia but is there a way or recognising it from all the others?
Sorry if that makes me look like a simpleton.
Tony H

Fatboy

8,089 posts

279 months

Sunday 5th September 2004
quotequote all
jeffriesmullet said:
that would be cool aint they hard to find though

Yes, they are pretty scarce - you see them on ebay every so often though...

TVR Slag's Bil

5,281 posts

253 months

Sunday 5th September 2004
quotequote all
HIF44 has a square base with no fuel bowl on the side.

I have twin 1.75 HS6's on my 1293cc motor, and although a bugger to set if initalily they are really sweet now, loads of torque and a noise to die for.

Mine were sorted out by Jon Mowatt in Essex, really knows his stuff.

Cooperman

4,428 posts

257 months

Monday 6th September 2004
quotequote all
I once had twin 1.75" HS6's on a 1330 motor I built for a Mk.2 Cooper 'S'. It had a 544 cam and a Longman head and ran really well.
Mr2Mike is quite right when he says that for a road engine a single HIF44 on a decent manifold is probably as good as twin 1.5" SU's. Twin SU's on a decent manifold would probably give just a small increase, although it would be down to setting-up in all probability.
I always thing carb sizes are a bit of a red-herring, as the big restriction with the 'A'-series heads is the inlet tracts and the basic siamesed design. It also depends on your cam choice. For example, if you are using, say, a 286 Megadyne you need the inlet tracts well opened out and a lot of head modification in the area of the valve guide 'lumps' and around the bend. Then bigger carbs could be used to best advantage at high (say above 5500 rpm)revs to provide bags of top end, but you lose bottom-end.
It's all a trade off really.

haynes

370 posts

249 months

Friday 10th September 2004
quotequote all
The intake, ie filters and stub stacks as well as the manifold can make or break a carb set up. I drop 5bhp from no air filters to k&n pancakes on twin sus. I debated fitting a webber but fitting a maniflow tubular manifold yielded 8 bhp, but this was all at the top end and even with a fast road cam may not see such a dramatic improvement. I also radiused the butterflies, removed half the spindle, cut down the butterfly screws (using locktite instead) and took out the sharp edges around the bridge of the carb.

sagalout

Original Poster:

18,916 posts

289 months

Sunday 26th September 2004
quotequote all
thanks for all your advice
A great help.
Cheers