Griff 500 v WRX

Griff 500 v WRX

Author
Discussion

John from AUS

Original Poster:

1 posts

257 months

Saturday 21st June 2003
quotequote all
I'm close to buying a 98 Griffith 500 that's for sale here in Sydney Australia. I want an interesting car to drive to work every day that will replace my old WRX. Reading the comments that have been posted in responce to others asking about using a Griff as a daily drive, has raised my concerns about the following;
How will the air condition work on 94-degree F days compared to a standard car?
How much more petrol would the Griffith use compared to my WRX, if driven in the same manner?
Will the Griffith generally cost more to maintain compared to a car like my WRX?
Difficult questions to answer, but a ballpark % type answer would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. John.

Ballistic Banana

14,700 posts

274 months

Saturday 21st June 2003
quotequote all
John from AUS said:
How will the air condition work on 94-degree F days compared to a standard car?

Havent got it myself but have heard very indifferent opinions on it, some saying its good some not. So i think you'll have to try the car in question out.

[quote]
How much more petrol would the Griffith use compared to my WRX, if driven in the same manner?
[/quote]
I generally get 240 miles to a tank so about 24mpg but this will be alot lower if in alot traffic or absolutely tanking it.

[quote]
Will the Griffith generally cost more to maintain compared to a car like my WRX?
[quote]
Dont know about the WRX but i would say if u budget around £1-1.5k per annum inc services should be about right.Try looking in the profiles of some griffith?chimaera owners.
[/quote]
[quote]
Difficult questions to answer, but a ballpark % type answer would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. John.[/quote]

Hope some of this is of some help

BB

jigs

1,840 posts

257 months

Saturday 21st June 2003
quotequote all
G'day mate! The following statistics (%) should answer your three queries:-

Griffith vs. WRX
Air Con. 92.75% vs. 100%
Petrol. 109.26% vs. 100%
Maintenance. 91.55% vs. 100%

Hope this helps.

Jigs

PS Did you know that 98.4% of statistics are lies!

PPS Sheila appeal Griffith 10000000000000% vs. WRX 10%.

>> Edited by jigs on Saturday 21st June 23:20

CraigAlsop

1,991 posts

275 months

Saturday 21st June 2003
quotequote all
Well I've got a Chimaera 450 & a P1 (effectively a WRX STi) & have had a normal Impreza turbo ( = WRX for non UK markets for the pre-2000 year shape)

I reckon that the Chimaera uses less petrol on average, but there's not much in it (neither car is exactly frugal, however )
Parts are cheaper for the TVR (at least over here in UK), however many things that need servicing are a lot more labour intensive.
As BB says, budget about 1-1.5K pounds per year & you won't go far wrong.
Aircon - standard TVR aircon ain't gonna be anywhere near as good, due to heatsoak from the engine bay - maybe an aftermarket one may help. Also under-bonnet temperatures can be improved by insulating the manifolds.
You may want to try & contact the TVR folk in Malasia that build(built?) Chimaeras, as I bet they have far better air-con than we have in UK.

onny

327 posts

269 months

Sunday 22nd June 2003
quotequote all
John,

I've just emailed you.

simpo one

87,124 posts

272 months

Sunday 22nd June 2003
quotequote all
Hi John. You can't really analyse TVRs like that because too much practicality will see you in a diesel BMW! TVRs are about fun and delightful impracticality. I think you should test-drive a few, and if you like what you see and think you can live with it on a daily basis, get one. If not, don't.

Simple!

egomeister

6,871 posts

270 months

Sunday 22nd June 2003
quotequote all
Why do you need aircon? With weather like you have in oz it should be top down all the way!

CraigAlsop

1,991 posts

275 months

Sunday 22nd June 2003
quotequote all
egomeister said:
Why do you need aircon? With weather like you have in oz it should be top down all the way!
So you can have top down and aircon on - v pleasant